Install
$ agentstack add skill-phazonoverload-devadvokit-turn-incident-into-content ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Before doing anything else:
- Check if
~/.devadvokit.mdexists. - If it does, read it silently and use it throughout this skill.
- If it does not, stop and tell the user: "I need your DevRel context before I can run this skill. Please run /setup-devadvokit first."
What NOT to Do
This skill produces content directions — not finished publication drafts. Specifically:
- No polished blog posts — you're creating frameworks for future pieces
- No commit-ready docs PRs — this gives you the structure and says where docs should be updated, not the PR text itself
- No social media threads — use
/repurpose-talkfor that workflow
The goal is extracting the reusable lesson from a specific incident.
Q&A
Ask these questions one at a time. Wait for each answer before asking the next.
- What was the problem? Describe what the user was trying to do and what they ran into. Be specific — the actual error message, the unexpected behavior, what was confusing.
- What did you try? Walk me through your debugging process. What solutions did you attempt? What didn't work? This shows the problem-solving journey.
- What actually worked? What solved it? Be specific — the command, the config change, the conceptual shift, whatever fixed it.
- What would you tell someone hitting this cold? If you were writing a guide for someone encountering this for the first time, what's the one-sentence takeaway they need?
- Who was the user? (Developer, data scientist, DevRel peer, etc. — this affects audience framing)
Output
Produce all of the following once the Q&A is complete.
1. TIL Format
A short-form "Today I Learned" version suitable for a quick post, thread, or newsletter item.
Title: [Working title with "TIL" framing]
Body: 2–3 sentences. Start with what didn't work, then the solution, then the takeaway. Keep it punchy.
Format fit: Micro-post, thread starter, or newsletter TIL section.
2. Full Context Format
A longer framework for a blog post or deep-dive content.
Working title: [Descriptive title, not TIL-style]
The problem: [1-2 paragraphs setting up what happened and why it matters]
The investigation: [What you tried, what didn't work, the debugging journey — 2-3 paragraphs]
The solution: [What actually fixed it — 1-2 paragraphs with code/config examples if applicable]
The transferable lesson: [1 paragraph on what this teaches more broadly]
Audience: [Who would benefit from this, based on both the user and your audience in ~/.devadvokit.md]
3. Format Recommendation
Recommend the best format based on the nature of the problem:
Choose ONE primary recommendation and explain why:
If docs update: > This should be a docs update. The user hit a gap in documentation — this should be fixed at the source. > - Where: [Which docs page/section] > - Why docs: [User was looking for official reference, not a blog post] > - Optional blog: A blog post could also work, but fix the docs first.
If blog post: > This should be a blog post. This was a reasonable problem that required real problem-solving — others will hit it and want the full context. > - Why blog: [It's a debugging journey others will benefit from] > - Angle: [The narrative frame that makes it compelling]
If talk seed: > This could be a talk. There's a conceptual lesson here that extends beyond this specific incident. > - Why talk: [The principle extends to other situations/technologies] > - Talk angle: [How to frame this as a broader lesson]
If small/one-off: > This is a TIL or small post. It's specific enough that it doesn't warrant a full piece — capture it as-is. > - Why small: [It's a specific gotcha, not a broader lesson] > - Fits: Newsletter item, TIL thread, quick post
Content Library Check
Scan the content library in ~/.devadvokit.md. If you've already covered this specific problem:
> "You covered this in [title] ([year]) — consider whether this adds new information or updates the existing piece."
If nothing overlaps, omit this section entirely.
Before presenting any output, read ../../shared/ai-antipatterns.md and silently rewrite any flagged patterns. Do not mention this step to the user.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: phazonoverload
- Source: phazonoverload/devadvokit
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://devadvokit.com
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.