AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Ste

skill-phb123-ste-ste · by phb123

Use when a user is confused or asks an agent to clarify, simplify, de-jargon, rewrite, or review technical content for clarity without losing important details.

No reviews yet
0 installs
32 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-phb123-ste-ste

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-phb123-ste-ste)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Ste? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

STE

Core principle

Make the meaning easier to follow, not less exact.

Select the operation

| User need | Operation | Output | |---|---|---| | Asks what something means | Explain | Give the answer first, then define necessary terms and add a concrete example when useful. | | Supplies text to simplify or clarify | Rewrite | Give the rewritten text first. Add notes only when they help the user make a decision. | | Asks what is unclear or how to improve it | Review | Give a short verdict, specific problems, and an improved version. |

If the request is ambiguous, infer the operation from the supplied content. Ask one focused question only when different interpretations would materially change the result.

Apply the method

  1. Extract the facts that must not change: names, numbers, units, warnings, conditions, sequence, scope, and obligation words such as must, shall, should, and may.
  2. Put the essential answer or action first.
  3. Put one main idea in each sentence.
  4. Prefer direct subject-verb-object sentences. Use active voice when the actor is known.
  5. Put a condition before the action that depends on it.
  6. Use one term consistently for one concept.
  7. Define necessary abbreviations and jargon at first use. Keep a technical term when the reader needs to recognize it elsewhere.
  8. Remove throat-clearing, filler, stacked nouns, and needless nominalizations.
  9. Use short paragraphs and lists when they make a sequence or comparison easier to scan.

Verify before responding

  • Compare the result with the source. Preserve every warning, number, limit, exception, and obligation strength.
  • Check pronouns and implied actors. If the source is ambiguous, do not invent or guess. State the ambiguity, give labeled interpretations, or ask one focused question.
  • Keep uncertainty visible. Do not turn an estimate into a fact or a possibility into a guarantee.
  • Do not activate STE only because technical content appears. Use it when the user signals confusion or asks for clearer communication.
  • Match the requested format and level of detail. Do not add a writing lesson unless the user asks for one.

Example

Input: "Simplify: After Sam told Lee that the service was down, they restarted it."

Output: "Who restarted the service: Sam, Lee, or both? The original sentence is ambiguous."

Common mistakes

| Mistake | Correction | |---|---| | Replace precision with vague everyday language | Explain the technical term, then keep it when useful. | | Change must to should | Preserve the original obligation strength. | | Pick a meaning for ambiguous text | Expose the ambiguity before rewriting. | | Start with process narration | Put the answer or rewritten text first. |

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.