Install
$ agentstack add skill-picsart-gen-ai-skills-enterprise-brand-governor ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Enterprise Brand Governor
Policy-as-code for AI-generated imagery. Every prompt is pre-validated against brand.md, every output is post-checked, violations escalate to a human approver, and every decision is logged. Built for regulated industries and any enterprise where an off-brand asset in production is a material risk.
When to Use
- Multiple teams (marketing, product, sales, agency partners) generating on the same brand system
- Regulated industries (pharma, finance, alcohol, kids) where imagery has legal constraints
- Brand-safety SLA — zero tolerance for competitor logos, restricted props, or off-palette output reaching production
- Agency handoff — external vendor generating on your brand, you need a gate you control
- Pre-production review cycle needs automation; humans only review escalations
Do not use for: quick exploration / mood-board work (gating slows ideation), or accounts without a written brand system yet (build brand.md first).
Prerequisites
Before rolling the governor across teams:
- Brand system location — path / repo / URL for
brand.md. Who owns it? What's the change-control process? - Policy strictness — reject (halt), flag (log + allow), or tier by asset destination (production = reject, internal = flag)?
- Approval chain — who reviews flagged items? What's the SLA for escalation turnaround (1h, 24h, 3 business days)?
- Logging destination — local
~/.gen-ai/audit/, S3 bucket, or ship to SIEM (Splunk, Datadog)? - Compliance constraints — GDPR / HIPAA / COPPA / financial-services rules that must be encoded in
brand.md? - Rollback plan — if the governor blocks a legitimate launch, who has override authority and how is that logged?
How to Run
The governor runs at three checkpoints: prompt, generation, output.
- Author
brand.md— palette, typography, allowed/denied props, imagery style, voice, regulated-category rules. Versioned in git. Commit SHA is the policy ID. - Pre-flight (prompt lint) —
gen-ai validateagainst the prompt before spending credits. Catches banned terms, disallowed concepts, missing required elements (e.g., disclaimer placement). - Brand-context generation — every
gen-ai generateandgen-ai batch runprompt includes the relevantbrand.mdconstraints. Review violations during QA. - Post-flight (output check) — for critical assets, a second-pass model (
gemini-3-pro-imageor vision check) verifies the output matches policy. Palette sampling, logo presence detection, prop allow-list. - Escalation — any
violationstatus routes to the approver queue. Humans review, approve or reject, decision is logged against the audit ID. - Audit export — daily / weekly export of all decisions to the configured SIEM or compliance archive.
Quick Reference
The governor adds policy metadata to every job record.
{
"defaults": {
"model": "flux-2-pro"
},
"metadata": {
"policy_id": "brand.md@sha:a4f1c9",
"policy_version": "2.3.0",
"policy_mode": "reject",
"approver": "brand-governance@company.com",
"escalation_channel": "#brand-review",
"audit_id": "GOV-2026-04-CAMPAIGN-LAUNCH",
"compliance_tags": ["GDPR", "US-FTC-native-ad"],
"data_residency": "eu-west-1"
},
"jobs": [
{
"id": "launch-hero-001",
"prompt": "Production launch hero. Editorial hero, team of four diverse professionals collaborating, modern office, natural light, brand palette. Apply brand.md constraints and require legal review before publishing."
}
]
}
Record policy decisions in the downstream audit ledger: approved, flagged, or rejected with the reason.
Quick Reference
| Sub-task | Model | Notes | |----------|-------|-------| | Prompt compliance check | gpt-image-1.5 / text reasoner | Cheap pre-flight before image spend | | Primary generation (brand-safe) | flux-2-pro | Strong prompt adherence, commercial-safe | | Primary generation (product accuracy) | flux-kontext-pro | Edit-mode when subject must be preserved | | Post-generation vision audit | gemini-3-pro-image | Strong scene understanding for policy checks | | Upscale approved outputs only | topaz-upscale-image | Never upscale before approval — wastes credits |
Confirm commercial-use status per provider with gen-ai models info . Pharma and financial services should maintain a short allow-list of pre-cleared models.
Procedure
- Treat
brand.mdas code. Versioned, reviewed, signed. The file's commit SHA is the policy ID in every audit record. - Always pin the model version. Policy interpretation changes when models change. Pair with
enterprise-pinned-registry. - Pre-flight before spend.
gen-ai validatecatches 80% of violations for $0. - Human-in-the-loop on rejects. A reject is a business decision, not a tool decision. Route to the approver.
- Default to reject, not flag. Flag mode is for drafts only; production must reject.
- Log everything. Every prompt, every decision, every override. No silent approvals.
- Rotate the audit log. Daily JSONL, shipped off the dev machine. Local logs disappear; SIEM doesn't.
- Test the governor with adversarial prompts. Red-team your own policy quarterly — does it actually catch competitor logos, prohibited claims?
- Document the override path. There will be legitimate exceptions. Make the override visible, logged, and time-boxed.
Pitfalls
brand.mdtoo vague — "use the brand palette" is not enforceable. Hex codes, prop allow-lists, explicit denies.- No override path — legitimate exceptions get bypassed outside the system, breaking the audit. Build the override in.
- Logs only local — dev machines die. Ship to SIEM or a durable archive from day one.
- Flag-mode in production — "we'll review later" never happens. Default reject.
- Unaudited model swaps — someone swaps
flux-2-profor a new model mid-campaign and policy interpretation changes. Pin. - Missing post-check on hero assets — prompt passed, output didn't. For production heroes, always run the vision audit.
Verification
Run gen-ai whoami to confirm authentication, then re-run the failed command with --debug.
Commands
# Pre-flight validate a prompt before spending credits
gen-ai validate --model flux-2-pro --file prompt.json
# Gated single generation
gen-ai generate --model flux-2-pro --prompt "$PROMPT" \
--save-to-drive --drive-folder "Gated-Output"
# Gated batch with retry on transient failures only (not violations)
gen-ai batch run campaign.json \
--concurrency 4 --output ./runs/campaign-2026-04
# Flag mode — for internal / draft contexts
gen-ai batch run drafts.json \
--output ./runs/drafts-2026-04
Cost & time
Governance overhead is tiny relative to generation. Pre-flight + post-check adds ~10–15% to credit cost on critical assets, ~0% on non-critical.
| Scenario | Governance overhead | |----------|--------------------| | Single gated generate | +0 credits (policy passed in-call) | | Single gen + vision audit | +1–2 credits | | Batch of 100, pre-flight only | +~5 credits (text reasoner) | | Batch of 1,000, full pipeline | +~50 credits + 1 approver hour | | Quarterly red-team audit | ~1 engineer-day + ~200 credits |
Violations rejected = credits saved. A single blocked off-brand production asset typically saves multiples of the governor's overhead.
See also
- [enterprise-pinned-registry](../enterprise-pinned-registry/SKILL.md) — pin model versions so policy interpretation stays stable
- [product-photo-studio](../product-photo-studio/SKILL.md) — brand-gated catalog pipeline (reshoot mode)
- [enterprise-press-batch](../enterprise-press-batch/SKILL.md) — brand-gated PR pipeline with embargo handling
- [gen-ai-use](../gen-ai-use/SKILL.md) — CLI reference
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: PicsArt
- Source: PicsArt/gen-ai-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.