— No reviews yet
0 installs
13 views
0.0% view→install
Install
$ agentstack add skill-postpartum-genushyacinthus29-dotnet-skills-dotnet-biome ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Are you the author of Dotnet Biome? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claimAbout
Biome for Frontend Assets in .NET Repositories
Trigger On
- the repo has
biome.json,@biomejs/biome, or the user asks for a faster all-in-one frontend formatter-linter stack - the repo wants one tool for formatting, linting, and import organization across JS, TS, CSS, JSON, GraphQL, or HTML
- the team is comparing Biome against ESLint plus Prettier or wants to simplify the current stack
Do Not Use For
- repos that rely on ESLint plugins or framework-specific rules Biome does not cover yet
- runtime site audits such as headers, accessibility, and SEO; route that to
dotnet-webhint - cases where a dedicated CSS or HTML tool is still the deliberate owner and no migration is requested
Inputs
- the nearest
AGENTS.md package.jsonbiome.jsonorbiome.jsonc- current ownership across ESLint, Prettier, Stylelint, and import ordering
Workflow
- Decide ownership first:
- Biome as the main formatter and linter
- Biome only for formatting
- Biome in coexistence with ESLint for plugin gaps
- Prefer a repo-local pinned install so CI and developer machines use the same version.
- Generate
biome.jsononly after confirming what the repo wants Biome to own. - Add repeatable scripts to
package.json, for example:
biome check .biome check . --write
- Keep file ownership explicit:
- Biome can own formatting, linting, and import sorting
- webhint still owns site-runtime audits
- ESLint may stay for plugin-heavy cases the repo intentionally keeps
- Start migrations with
checkand bounded folders before flipping the whole repo to--write. - Re-run the frontend build and tests after broad formatting or lint-fix passes.
Bootstrap When Missing
- Detect current state:
rg --files -g 'package.json' -g 'biome.json*'rg -n '"@biomejs/biome"|"eslint"|"prettier"|"stylelint"' --glob 'package.json' .
- Prefer a repo-local pinned install:
npm i -D -E @biomejs/biome
- Create config deliberately:
npx @biomejs/biome init
- Add repeatable commands to
AGENTS.mdandpackage.json, then verify with:
npx @biomejs/biome check .npx @biomejs/biome check . --write
- Return
status: configuredif Biome is now wired with explicit ownership, orstatus: improvedif the existing setup was tightened. - Return
status: not_applicablewhen the repo intentionally stays on ESLint-centered ownership and no migration or comparison was requested.
Handle Failures
- Missing-rule parity with specialized ESLint plugins is an ownership problem; keep ESLint for those files until the gap is intentionally closed.
- Overly broad
--writeruns can cause large churn; start with bounded folders or changed files first. - Generated assets or vendored code should be excluded in
biome.jsonbefore trusting the signal. - If developers complain that Biome and ESLint disagree, define file ownership instead of running both broadly on the same surface by accident.
Deliver
- explicit Biome ownership and version pinning
- checked-in config and repeatable
checkcommands - a migration or coexistence plan versus ESLint and other frontend tools
Validate
- the chosen ownership model is documented
- CI and local runs use the same Biome version
- the target globs exclude generated and vendored assets
- downstream build or test flows still pass after
--writeruns
Ralph Loop
- Plan: analyze current state, target outcome, constraints, and risks.
- Execute one step and produce a concrete delta.
- Review the result and capture findings.
- Apply fixes in small batches and rerun checks.
- Update the plan after each iteration.
- Repeat until outcomes are acceptable.
- If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return
status: not_applicablewith a reason.
Required Result Format
status:complete|clean|improved|configured|not_applicable|blockedplan: concise plan and current stepactions_taken: concrete changes madeverification: commands, checks, or review evidenceremaining: unresolved items ornone
Example Requests
- "Replace Prettier and basic linting with Biome in this repo."
- "Add Biome to the frontend under ClientApp."
- "Explain whether we should keep ESLint after adding Biome."
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Postpartum-genushyacinthus29
- Source: Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.