AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Dotnet Best Practices

skill-practicalswan-agent-skills-dotnet-best-practices · by PracticalSwan

Ensure .NET/C# code follows maintainable, modern best practices. Use when reviewing or improving C# code, solution structure, async patterns, dependency injection, or testability.

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-practicalswan-agent-skills-dotnet-best-practices

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Dotnet Best Practices? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

.NET/C# Best Practices

> Optimized for current .NET SDK-style projects, C# 12+, ASP.NET Core LTS, and current xUnit, NUnit, or MSTest workflows.

Your task is to ensure .NET/C# code in the selected scope or current solution meets the best practices specific to this project. This includes:

  • Leverage native parallel subagent dispatch and 200k+ context windows where available.

Documentation & Structure

  • Create comprehensive XML documentation comments for all public classes, interfaces, methods, and properties
  • Include parameter descriptions and return value descriptions in XML comments
  • Follow the established namespace structure: {Core|Console|App|Service}.{Feature}

Design Patterns & Architecture

  • Use primary constructor syntax for dependency injection (e.g., public class MyClass(IDependency dependency))
  • Implement the Command Handler pattern with generic base classes (e.g., CommandHandler)
  • Use interface segregation with clear naming conventions (prefix interfaces with 'I')
  • Follow the Factory pattern for complex object creation.

Dependency Injection & Services

  • Use constructor dependency injection with null checks via ArgumentNullException
  • Register services with appropriate lifetimes (Singleton, Scoped, Transient)
  • Use Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection patterns
  • Implement service interfaces for testability

Resource Management & Localization

  • Use ResourceManager for localized messages and error strings
  • Separate LogMessages and ErrorMessages resource files
  • Access resources via _resourceManager.GetString("MessageKey")

Async/Await Patterns

  • Use async/await for all I/O operations and long-running tasks
  • Return Task or Task from async methods
  • Use ConfigureAwait(false) where appropriate
  • Handle async exceptions properly

Testing Standards

  • Use MSTest framework with FluentAssertions for assertions
  • Follow AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert)
  • Use Moq for mocking dependencies
  • Test both success and failure scenarios
  • Include null parameter validation tests

Configuration & Settings

  • Use strongly-typed configuration classes with data annotations
  • Implement validation attributes (Required, NotEmptyOrWhitespace)
  • Use IConfiguration binding for settings
  • Support appsettings.json configuration files

Semantic Kernel & AI Integration

  • Use Microsoft.SemanticKernel for AI operations
  • Implement proper kernel configuration and service registration
  • Handle AI model settings (ChatCompletion, Embedding, etc.)
  • Use structured output patterns for reliable AI responses

Error Handling & Logging

  • Use structured logging with Microsoft.Extensions.Logging
  • Include scoped logging with meaningful context
  • Throw specific exceptions with descriptive messages
  • Use try-catch blocks for expected failure scenarios

Performance & Security

  • Use C# 12+ features and .NET 8 optimizations where applicable
  • Implement proper input validation and sanitization
  • Use parameterized queries for database operations
  • Follow secure coding practices for AI/ML operations

Code Quality

  • Ensure SOLID principles compliance
  • Avoid code duplication through base classes and utilities
  • Use meaningful names that reflect domain concepts
  • Keep methods focused and cohesive
  • Implement proper disposal patterns for resources

Anti-Patterns

  • Constructing infrastructure inside business code: It defeats dependency injection and makes testing or observability much harder.
  • Skipping cancellation and logging in I/O paths: Modern .NET services need both operational visibility and cooperative shutdown behavior.
  • Hiding configuration behind magic strings: Options drift across environments when the contract is not explicit.

Verification Protocol

Before claiming "skill applied successfully":

  1. Pass/fail: The Dotnet Best Practices implementation names the target runtime, framework version, and affected files.
  2. Pass/fail: Build, lint, test, or equivalent local validation is run for the changed surface.
  3. Pass/fail: Edge cases for errors, dependency drift, and environment differences are addressed or explicitly out of scope.
  4. Pressure-test scenario: Apply the workflow to a change that passes happy-path tests but fails one boundary condition.
  5. Success metric: Zero untested success claims; every implementation claim maps to a command or artifact.

Before and After Example

// Before
public sealed class WeatherService
{
    public async Task GetAsync()
    {
        using var client = new HttpClient();
        return await client.GetStringAsync("https://api.example.com/weather");
    }
}

// After
public sealed class WeatherService(HttpClient client, ILogger logger)
{
    public async Task GetAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    {
        logger.LogInformation("Fetching weather data");
        return await client.GetStringAsync("weather", cancellationToken);
    }
}

Uses dependency injection, logging, and cancellation instead of constructing infrastructure per call.

Common Pitfalls

  • Constructing infrastructure inside business code: It defeats dependency injection and makes testing or observability much harder.
  • Treating async methods like fire-and-forget work: Exceptions and cancellations disappear unless the call chain is designed for them.
  • Burying configuration in magic strings: Runtime behavior drifts across environments when options are not strongly typed.

Cross-Client Portability

This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI.

  • GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill or plugin path, or wrap the workflow as project instructions if the host does not support portable skill folders directly.
  • Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin or marketplace source.
  • Codex: install or sync the folder into $CODEX_HOME/skills/ and restart Codex after major changes.
  • Gemini CLI: this repository generates a project command named /skills:dotnet-best-practices from this skill. Rebuild commands with python scripts/export-gemini-skill.py dotnet-best-practices and then run /commands reload inside Gemini CLI.

MCP Availability And Fallback

Preferred MCP Server: None required

  • Fallback prompt: "Use the .NET/C# Best Practices skill without MCP. Rely on the local SKILL.md, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding."
  • If the current host does not expose a matching server, use the bundled references, scripts, native toolchain, and manual workflow already described in this skill.
  • Treat direct local verification, rendered output, logs, tests, or screenshots as the fallback evidence path before completion.

Related Skills

  • [csharp-xunit](../csharp-xunit/SKILL.md): Use it when the workflow also needs modern xUnit test design in C#.
  • [code-quality](../code-quality/SKILL.md): Use it when the workflow also needs two-stage review (spec compliance first, then code quality), maintainability, and refactoring guidance.
  • [development-workflow](../development-workflow/SKILL.md): Use it when the workflow also needs planning, quality gates, and delivery tracking.
  • [microsoft-development](../microsoft-development/SKILL.md): Use it when the workflow also needs microsoft development guidance.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.