AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Speckit Phasestoissues

skill-pradeepmouli-skillit-speckit-phasestoissues · by pradeepmouli

Convert development phases into individual GitHub issues for better tracking

No reviews yet
0 installs
32 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-pradeepmouli-skillit-speckit-phasestoissues

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-pradeepmouli-skillit-speckit-phasestoissues)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Speckit Phasestoissues? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Speckit Phasestoissues Skill

User Input

$ARGUMENTS

You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).

Outline

1. Load Feature Context

Run the prerequisite check script from repo root and parse the output:

cd "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)" && \
source .specify/scripts/bash/common.sh && \
get_feature_paths

This provides:

  • FEATURE_DIR - Feature directory path
  • FEATURE_SPEC - Specification file (spec.md)
  • IMPL_PLAN - Implementation plan (plan.md)
  • TASKS - Task list (tasks.md)

All paths are absolute.

2. Verify GitHub Repository

Get the Git remote URL:

git config --get remote.origin.url

> [!CAUTION] > ONLY PROCEED TO NEXT STEPS IF THE REMOTE IS A GITHUB URL

Stop immediately if:

  • Remote is not a GitHub URL
  • Remote URL cannot be determined
  • Repository does not match expected pattern

3. Extract Phase Information

Load and parse the specification file ($FEATURE_SPEC / spec.md):

Extract:

  • Phase Title: First H1 heading or feature name from directory
  • Phase Description: Content under "Story" or "Overview" section
  • Acceptance Criteria: Content under "Acceptance Criteria" section
  • Context/Background: Any additional context sections

Parse Tasks from $TASKS (tasks.md):

  • Extract all task lines in format: - [ ] T001: Task description
  • Preserve task IDs and descriptions
  • Note task status (pending vs completed)

Parse Plan (if exists) from $IMPL_PLAN (plan.md):

  • Extract implementation approach
  • Note technical decisions
  • Identify dependencies

4. Build Phase Issue Body

Construct a comprehensive GitHub issue for each phase with this structure:

## Description

[Phase description from spec.md]

## Acceptance Criteria

[Acceptance criteria from spec.md]

## Implementation Plan

[High-level approach from plan.md, if available]

### Key Technical Decisions
- [Decision 1]
- [Decision 2]

### Dependencies
- [Dependency 1]
- [Dependency 2]

## Tasks

See sub-issues for individual task tracking.

## Context

**Branch**: `[branch-name]`
**Feature Directory**: `[feature-dir]`
**Phase**: [phase-number]/[total-phases]
**Created from spec-kit workflow**

---

**Note**: Sub-issues will be created for each task. Use `/speckit.review` to validate implementation against acceptance criteria.

5. Determine Issue Labels

Automatically assign labels based on:

Workflow Type (from branch pattern):

  • bugfix/*bug, bugfix
  • refactor/*refactor, technical-debt
  • hotfix/*hotfix, urgent
  • modify/*enhancement, modification
  • deprecate/*deprecation, breaking-change
  • Standard feature → feature, enhancement

Priority (from spec.md if available):

  • Critical/High → priority: high
  • Medium → priority: medium
  • Low → priority: low

Status:

  • status: planning (if tasks exist but none completed)
  • status: in-progress (if some tasks completed)

6. Create Phase Issues

For each phase, use the GitHub MCP server tool to create the parent issue:

Required:

  • owner: Extract from Git remote URL
  • repo: Extract from Git remote URL
  • title: "Phase N: [Phase title]" from spec.md
  • body: Formatted issue body from step 4
  • labels: Labels from step 5

Capture the issue number for sub-issue creation.

7. Create Sub-Issues for Tasks

For each task within a phase:

  1. Create task issue using GitHub MCP:
  • title: "T001: [Task description]" (preserve task ID)
  • body:

```markdown ## Task Details

[Task description from tasks.md]

## Context

Parent Phase: #[phase-issue-number] Branch: [branch-name] Feature Directory: [feature-dir]

---

Part of larger feature spec-kit workflow. ```

  • labels: Same labels as parent phase issue
  1. Link as sub-issue using mcp_github_github_sub_issue_write:
  • method: "add"
  • owner: From Git remote URL
  • repo: From Git remote URL
  • issue_number: Parent phase issue number
  • sub_issue_id: Task issue ID (not issue number - get from created issue)

Important: GitHub sub-issues require issue IDs, not issue numbers. Extract the id field from the created task issue.

8. Set Sub-Issue Priority

If tasks have natural ordering, use mcp_github_github_sub_issue_write with method "reprioritize" to set task order within the phase

  • labels: Labels from step 5

> [!CAUTION] > UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES EVER CREATE ISSUES IN REPOSITORIES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE REMOTE URL

Example:

Repository: github.com/user/repo
Title: Phase 1: User Authentication
Labels: feature, status: planning
Body: [Full formatted content]

7. Link Issue to Branch

After creating the issue, provide instructions to link it:

# Update spec.md with issue link
echo -e "\n## GitHub Issue\n\n#[issue-number]" >> "$FEATURE_SPEC"

# Or add issue number to commit messages
git commit --amend -m "feat: [phase title] (#[issue-number])"

8. Output Summary

Display result to user:

✅ GitHub Issue Created

Issue: #[number]
Title: [phase title]
URL: https://github.com/[owner]/[repo]/issues/[number]

Tasks Included: [N tasks]
Labels: [label1, label2, ...]

Next Steps:
1. Review issue on GitHub
2. Assign to team members
3. Add to project board/milestone
4. Track progress by checking off tasks
5. Use /speckit.review when ready for validation

Important Notes

  1. One Issue Per Phase: Creates a single issue representing the development phase
  2. Tasks as Checkboxes: All tasks become checkboxes in the issue body
  3. Comprehensive Context: Issue includes spec, acceptance criteria, and plan
  4. Safe by Default: Validates GitHub remote before creating issues
  5. Workflow Aware: Labels reflect the workflow type (bugfix, refactor, etc.)
  6. Trackable: Issue provides full context for team discussion and tracking

Edge Cases

No tasks.md exists:

  • Create issue with story and acceptance criteria only
  • Note in issue body that task breakdown is needed
  • Recommend running /speckit.tasks first

No spec.md exists:

  • Cannot create issue without phase context
  • Recommend running /speckit.plan or creating spec first
  • Display error message with guidance

Multiple features in repo:

  • Uses current feature based on branch/directory context
  • Issue title and content scoped to current feature only

Issue already exists:

  • Check if issue with same title exists (optional)
  • Warn user before creating duplicate
  • Offer to update existing issue instead

No GitHub remote:

  • Stop with clear error message
  • Cannot create issues without GitHub repository
  • Suggest adding GitHub remote or creating issues manually

Context Information

User input: $ARGUMENTS

Create a comprehensive, well-structured GitHub issue that represents the development phase with tasks as actionable checkboxes.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.