Install
$ agentstack add skill-pradeepmouli-skillit-speckit-phasestoissues ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Speckit Phasestoissues Skill
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Outline
1. Load Feature Context
Run the prerequisite check script from repo root and parse the output:
cd "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)" && \
source .specify/scripts/bash/common.sh && \
get_feature_paths
This provides:
FEATURE_DIR- Feature directory pathFEATURE_SPEC- Specification file (spec.md)IMPL_PLAN- Implementation plan (plan.md)TASKS- Task list (tasks.md)
All paths are absolute.
2. Verify GitHub Repository
Get the Git remote URL:
git config --get remote.origin.url
> [!CAUTION] > ONLY PROCEED TO NEXT STEPS IF THE REMOTE IS A GITHUB URL
Stop immediately if:
- Remote is not a GitHub URL
- Remote URL cannot be determined
- Repository does not match expected pattern
3. Extract Phase Information
Load and parse the specification file ($FEATURE_SPEC / spec.md):
Extract:
- Phase Title: First H1 heading or feature name from directory
- Phase Description: Content under "Story" or "Overview" section
- Acceptance Criteria: Content under "Acceptance Criteria" section
- Context/Background: Any additional context sections
Parse Tasks from $TASKS (tasks.md):
- Extract all task lines in format:
- [ ] T001: Task description - Preserve task IDs and descriptions
- Note task status (pending vs completed)
Parse Plan (if exists) from $IMPL_PLAN (plan.md):
- Extract implementation approach
- Note technical decisions
- Identify dependencies
4. Build Phase Issue Body
Construct a comprehensive GitHub issue for each phase with this structure:
## Description
[Phase description from spec.md]
## Acceptance Criteria
[Acceptance criteria from spec.md]
## Implementation Plan
[High-level approach from plan.md, if available]
### Key Technical Decisions
- [Decision 1]
- [Decision 2]
### Dependencies
- [Dependency 1]
- [Dependency 2]
## Tasks
See sub-issues for individual task tracking.
## Context
**Branch**: `[branch-name]`
**Feature Directory**: `[feature-dir]`
**Phase**: [phase-number]/[total-phases]
**Created from spec-kit workflow**
---
**Note**: Sub-issues will be created for each task. Use `/speckit.review` to validate implementation against acceptance criteria.
5. Determine Issue Labels
Automatically assign labels based on:
Workflow Type (from branch pattern):
bugfix/*→bug,bugfixrefactor/*→refactor,technical-debthotfix/*→hotfix,urgentmodify/*→enhancement,modificationdeprecate/*→deprecation,breaking-change- Standard feature →
feature,enhancement
Priority (from spec.md if available):
- Critical/High →
priority: high - Medium →
priority: medium - Low →
priority: low
Status:
status: planning(if tasks exist but none completed)status: in-progress(if some tasks completed)
6. Create Phase Issues
For each phase, use the GitHub MCP server tool to create the parent issue:
Required:
owner: Extract from Git remote URLrepo: Extract from Git remote URLtitle: "Phase N: [Phase title]" from spec.mdbody: Formatted issue body from step 4labels: Labels from step 5
Capture the issue number for sub-issue creation.
7. Create Sub-Issues for Tasks
For each task within a phase:
- Create task issue using GitHub MCP:
title: "T001: [Task description]" (preserve task ID)body:
```markdown ## Task Details
[Task description from tasks.md]
## Context
Parent Phase: #[phase-issue-number] Branch: [branch-name] Feature Directory: [feature-dir]
---
Part of larger feature spec-kit workflow. ```
labels: Same labels as parent phase issue
- Link as sub-issue using
mcp_github_github_sub_issue_write:
method: "add"owner: From Git remote URLrepo: From Git remote URLissue_number: Parent phase issue numbersub_issue_id: Task issue ID (not issue number - get from created issue)
Important: GitHub sub-issues require issue IDs, not issue numbers. Extract the id field from the created task issue.
8. Set Sub-Issue Priority
If tasks have natural ordering, use mcp_github_github_sub_issue_write with method "reprioritize" to set task order within the phase
labels: Labels from step 5
> [!CAUTION] > UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES EVER CREATE ISSUES IN REPOSITORIES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE REMOTE URL
Example:
Repository: github.com/user/repo
Title: Phase 1: User Authentication
Labels: feature, status: planning
Body: [Full formatted content]
7. Link Issue to Branch
After creating the issue, provide instructions to link it:
# Update spec.md with issue link
echo -e "\n## GitHub Issue\n\n#[issue-number]" >> "$FEATURE_SPEC"
# Or add issue number to commit messages
git commit --amend -m "feat: [phase title] (#[issue-number])"
8. Output Summary
Display result to user:
✅ GitHub Issue Created
Issue: #[number]
Title: [phase title]
URL: https://github.com/[owner]/[repo]/issues/[number]
Tasks Included: [N tasks]
Labels: [label1, label2, ...]
Next Steps:
1. Review issue on GitHub
2. Assign to team members
3. Add to project board/milestone
4. Track progress by checking off tasks
5. Use /speckit.review when ready for validation
Important Notes
- One Issue Per Phase: Creates a single issue representing the development phase
- Tasks as Checkboxes: All tasks become checkboxes in the issue body
- Comprehensive Context: Issue includes spec, acceptance criteria, and plan
- Safe by Default: Validates GitHub remote before creating issues
- Workflow Aware: Labels reflect the workflow type (bugfix, refactor, etc.)
- Trackable: Issue provides full context for team discussion and tracking
Edge Cases
No tasks.md exists:
- Create issue with story and acceptance criteria only
- Note in issue body that task breakdown is needed
- Recommend running
/speckit.tasksfirst
No spec.md exists:
- Cannot create issue without phase context
- Recommend running
/speckit.planor creating spec first - Display error message with guidance
Multiple features in repo:
- Uses current feature based on branch/directory context
- Issue title and content scoped to current feature only
Issue already exists:
- Check if issue with same title exists (optional)
- Warn user before creating duplicate
- Offer to update existing issue instead
No GitHub remote:
- Stop with clear error message
- Cannot create issues without GitHub repository
- Suggest adding GitHub remote or creating issues manually
Context Information
User input: $ARGUMENTS
Create a comprehensive, well-structured GitHub issue that represents the development phase with tasks as actionable checkboxes.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: pradeepmouli
- Source: pradeepmouli/skillit
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://pradeepmouli.github.io/skillit/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.