AgentStack
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Think Authentic Dissent

skill-product-on-purpose-thinking-framework-skills-think-authentic-dissent · by product-on-purpose

Checks whether a decision has genuine minority dissent or only smooth surface consensus, identifies who actually holds a contrary view, and plans how to elicit and protect real dissent, flagging clearly where a view is constructed rather than authentically held. Use when consensus feels too easy, or to set up genuine challenge before a high-stakes call.

No reviews yet
0 installs
14 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-product-on-purpose-thinking-framework-skills-think-authentic-dissent

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Think Authentic Dissent? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Authentic Dissent

Genuine minority dissent makes a group reason better: a person who truly holds a contrary view makes the majority search more broadly and consider more options, even when the dissenter is wrong. The catch, established by the same research, is that role-played devil's advocacy does not replicate this - assigned dissent gets discounted as performance. So an AI cannot be the dissent; anything a model argues against a plan is constructed, the weaker kind. This skill therefore does not pretend to be the dissenter. It engineers the conditions for real dissent: it audits whether genuine dissent exists, surfaces who holds it, plans how to elicit and protect it, and flags constructed dissent as constructed. The output is a dissent audit and plan.

When to Use

  • A group decision shows suspiciously smooth consensus and nobody is really pushing back.
  • You can influence how challenge is gathered (who speaks, anonymous input, outside reviewers).
  • Before a high-stakes call where you want genuine, not performed, challenge.

When NOT to Use

  • As a source of dissent itself: the model's contrarian view is constructed, not authentic (use red-team-light for that, which is honest about being constructed).
  • In a purely solo setting with no access to other people - you cannot manufacture authentic dissent.
  • When genuine dissent already exists and is being heard.
  • To "assign a devil's advocate" and consider the job done (the evidence says that does not deliver the benefit).

Instructions

When asked to set up or audit dissent, follow these steps:

  1. Audit the consensus. Is the agreement genuine, or is it smoothness from anchoring, hierarchy, or conformity? Note signs (no one names a downside, the senior view landed first, dissent would be costly).
  2. Locate real dissent. Identify whether anyone actually holds a minority view, and whether it is being voiced, ignored, or suppressed.
  3. Label what is in play. Mark any current "dissent" as authentic (a real holder) or constructed (assigned/role-played/AI). Do not let constructed dissent count as the real thing.
  4. Plan to elicit and protect genuine dissent. Concrete moves: anonymous pre-reads, asking the quietest person first, bringing in an outside reviewer who genuinely disagrees, separating generation from evaluation, protecting the dissenter from cost.
  5. For high stakes, prescribe a real dissenter. Recommend finding a person who actually holds the contrary view, rather than relying on a constructed critique.
  6. Emit the dissent audit and plan per references/TEMPLATE.md.

Output Format

Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md. The deliverable is the audit plus an elicit-and-protect plan, not a constructed counter-argument (that is red-team-light's job).

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

  • [ ] The consensus is assessed for whether it is genuine or smoothed by hierarchy/conformity.
  • [ ] Any dissent currently in play is labeled authentic vs constructed.
  • [ ] The plan gives concrete ways to elicit and protect real dissent.
  • [ ] For high stakes, it prescribes finding a real dissenter, not relying on constructed critique.
  • [ ] The skill does not present the model's own contrarian view as authentic dissent.
  • [ ] The output is the dissent audit/plan artifact, not prose.

Evidence

Tier S. Authentic minority dissent reliably broadens a group's thinking (Nemeth et al. 2001; In Defense of Troublemakers), and the same research shows role-played devil's advocacy does not replicate it. That negative result is load-bearing here: an AI's contrarian output is constructed, so this skill works on the conditions for real dissent rather than claiming to supply it. The evidence is for human groups; it bounds, not just transfers to, AI use. Full grading: evidence/dossier.md.

Examples

See references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed dissent audit and plan.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.