Install
$ agentstack add skill-proffesor-for-testing-agentic-qe-api-testing-patterns ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
API Testing Patterns
When testing APIs or designing API test strategy:
- IDENTIFY testing level: contract, integration, or component
- TEST the contract, not implementation (consumer perspective)
- VALIDATE auth, input, errors, idempotency, concurrency
- AUTOMATE in CI/CD with schema validation
- MONITOR production APIs for contract drift
Quick Pattern Selection:
- Microservices → Consumer-driven contracts (Pact)
- REST APIs → CRUD + pagination + filtering tests
- GraphQL → Query validation + complexity limits
- External deps → Mock with component testing
- Performance → Load test critical endpoints
Critical Success Factors:
- APIs are contracts - test from consumer perspective
- Always test error scenarios, not just happy paths
- Version your API tests to prevent breaking changes
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- Testing REST or GraphQL APIs
- Validating microservice contracts
- Designing API test strategies
- Preventing breaking API changes
Testing Levels
| Level | Purpose | Dependencies | Speed | |-------|---------|--------------|-------| | Contract | Provider-consumer agreement | None | Fast | | Component | API in isolation | Mocked | Fast | | Integration | Real dependencies | Database, services | Slower |
Critical Test Scenarios
| Scenario | Must Test | Example | |----------|----------|---------| | Auth | 401/403 handling | Expired token, wrong user | | Input | 400 validation | Missing fields, wrong types | | Errors | 500 graceful handling | DB down, timeout | | Idempotency | Duplicate prevention | Same idempotency key | | Concurrency | Race conditions | Parallel checkout |
Tools
- Contract: Pact, Spring Cloud Contract
- REST: Supertest, REST-assured, Playwright
- Load: k6, Artillery, JMeter
Agent Coordination
qe-api-contract-validator: Validate contracts, detect breaking changesqe-test-generator: Generate tests from OpenAPI specqe-performance-tester: Load test endpointsqe-security-scanner: API security testing
Contract Testing
Pattern: Consumer-Driven Contracts
// Consumer defines expectations
const contract = {
request: { method: 'POST', path: '/orders', body: { productId: 'abc', quantity: 2 } },
response: { status: 201, body: { orderId: 'string', total: 'number' } }
};
// Provider must fulfill
test('order API meets contract', async () => {
const response = await api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: 2 });
expect(response.status).toBe(201);
expect(response.body).toMatchSchema({
orderId: expect.any(String),
total: expect.any(Number)
});
});
When: Microservices, distributed systems, third-party integrations
Critical Test Patterns
Authentication & Authorization
describe('Auth', () => {
it('rejects without token', async () => {
expect((await api.get('/orders')).status).toBe(401);
});
it('rejects expired token', async () => {
const expired = generateExpiredToken();
expect((await api.get('/orders', { headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${expired}` } })).status).toBe(401);
});
it('blocks cross-user access', async () => {
const userAToken = generateToken({ userId: 'A' });
expect((await api.get('/orders/user-B-order', { headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userAToken}` } })).status).toBe(403);
});
});
Input Validation
describe('Validation', () => {
it('validates required fields', async () => {
const response = await api.post('/orders', { quantity: 2 }); // Missing productId
expect(response.status).toBe(400);
expect(response.body.errors).toContain('productId is required');
});
it('validates types', async () => {
expect((await api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: 'two' })).status).toBe(400);
});
it('validates ranges', async () => {
expect((await api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: -5 })).status).toBe(400);
});
});
Idempotency
it('prevents duplicates with idempotency key', async () => {
const key = 'unique-123';
const data = { productId: 'abc', quantity: 2 };
const r1 = await api.post('/orders', data, { headers: { 'Idempotency-Key': key } });
const r2 = await api.post('/orders', data, { headers: { 'Idempotency-Key': key } });
expect(r1.body.orderId).toBe(r2.body.orderId); // Same order
});
Concurrency
it('handles race condition on inventory', async () => {
const promises = Array(10).fill().map(() =>
api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: 1 })
);
const responses = await Promise.all(promises);
const successful = responses.filter(r => r.status === 201);
const inventory = await db.inventory.findById('abc');
expect(inventory.quantity).toBe(initialQuantity - successful.length);
});
REST CRUD Pattern
describe('Product CRUD', () => {
let productId;
it('CREATE', async () => {
const r = await api.post('/products', { name: 'Widget', price: 10 });
expect(r.status).toBe(201);
productId = r.body.id;
});
it('READ', async () => {
const r = await api.get(`/products/${productId}`);
expect(r.body.name).toBe('Widget');
});
it('UPDATE', async () => {
const r = await api.put(`/products/${productId}`, { price: 12 });
expect(r.body.price).toBe(12);
});
it('DELETE', async () => {
expect((await api.delete(`/products/${productId}`)).status).toBe(204);
expect((await api.get(`/products/${productId}`)).status).toBe(404);
});
});
Best Practices
✅ Do This
- Test from consumer perspective
- Use schema validation (not exact values)
- Test error scenarios extensively
- Version API tests
- Automate in CI/CD
❌ Avoid This
- Testing implementation, not contract
- Ignoring HTTP semantics (status codes)
- No negative testing
- Asserting on field order or extra fields
- Slow tests (mock external services)
Agent-Assisted API Testing
// Validate contracts
await Task("Contract Validation", {
spec: 'openapi.yaml',
endpoint: '/orders',
checkBreakingChanges: true
}, "qe-api-contract-validator");
// Generate tests from spec
await Task("Generate API Tests", {
spec: 'openapi.yaml',
coverage: 'comprehensive',
include: ['happy-paths', 'input-validation', 'auth-scenarios', 'error-handling']
}, "qe-test-generator");
// Load test
await Task("API Load Test", {
endpoint: '/orders',
rps: 1000,
duration: '5min'
}, "qe-performance-tester");
// Security scan
await Task("API Security Scan", {
spec: 'openapi.yaml',
checks: ['sql-injection', 'xss', 'broken-auth', 'rate-limiting']
}, "qe-security-scanner");
Agent Coordination Hints
Memory Namespace
aqe/api-testing/
├── contracts/* - API contract definitions
├── generated-tests/* - Generated test suites
├── validation/* - Contract validation results
└── performance/* - Load test results
Fleet Coordination
const apiFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'contract-testing',
agents: ['qe-api-contract-validator', 'qe-test-generator', 'qe-test-executor'],
topology: 'mesh'
});
await apiFleet.execute({
services: [
{ name: 'orders-api', consumers: ['checkout-ui', 'admin-api'] },
{ name: 'payment-api', consumers: ['orders-api'] }
]
});
Related Skills
- [agentic-quality-engineering](../agentic-quality-engineering/) - API testing with agents
- [tdd-london-chicago](../tdd-london-chicago/) - London school for API testing
- [performance-testing](../performance-testing/) - API load testing
- [security-testing](../security-testing/) - API security validation
- [contract-testing](../contract-testing/) - Consumer-driven contracts deep dive
Remember
API testing = verifying contracts and behavior, not implementation. Focus on what matters to consumers: correct responses, proper error handling, acceptable performance.
With Agents: Agents automate contract validation, generate comprehensive test suites from specs, and monitor production APIs for drift. Use agents to maintain API quality at scale.
Gotchas
- Agent generates tests against documented API, not actual API — always validate against running service first
- Auth tokens expire between test runs — use fixtures with long-lived tokens or refresh before each suite
- Rate limiting in CI causes intermittent failures — add retry with exponential backoff for 429 responses
- GraphQL introspection may be disabled in production — test against staging schema, not production endpoint
- Idempotency tests need unique request IDs per run — hardcoded IDs cause false passes on retry
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: proffesor-for-testing
- Source: proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://agentic-qe.dev/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.