AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Aeo Multi Prompt Strategy

skill-psyduckler-aeo-skills-aeo-multi-prompt-strategy · by psyduckler

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
9 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-psyduckler-aeo-skills-aeo-multi-prompt-strategy

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Aeo Multi Prompt Strategy? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

AEO Multi-Prompt Strategy

> Source: github.com/psyduckler/aeo-skills > Part of: AEO Skills Suite

Find authority hub pages that enter the recurring retrieval set for multiple query patterns — win many prompts with one page.

Background

Influence over AI answers compounds through repeated inclusion in the recurring retrieval set. But the most powerful form of authority isn't being cited for one prompt — it's being cited for many. When a single page enters the candidate set for 5 different prompts, it becomes an authority hub: the model has learned to retrieve it across diverse query patterns.

This matters because Gemini generates varied, specific search queries — the "long long tail" of its search behavior means each prompt generates different queries, yet the same authoritative pages keep surfacing. Authority hubs exploit this: they're comprehensive enough to match multiple query patterns, creating expanding entry points across the retrieval landscape.

In Gemini's search-first architecture, every prompt fires fresh web searches. A page that appears in the results for prompts A, B, and C is seen by the model three times as often as a page that only appears for prompt A. This repeated visibility across different retrieval contexts is what builds durable authority — not in the model's weights, but in the model's consistent retrieval behavior.

The strategic question this skill answers: should you build one comprehensive hub page, or many focused pages? The data tells you which approach the model's retrieval behavior actually rewards.

Defaults

  • Model: gemini-3-flash-preview — the same model powering Google AI Overviews
  • Samples: 20 runs per prompt — captures cross-prompt citation patterns

Requirements

  • Gemini API key (free from aistudio.google.com) — set as GEMINI_API_KEY env var
  • Python 3.9+
  • No pip dependencies (stdlib only)

Usage

# Basic — analyze 3 related prompts
GEMINI_API_KEY="$GEMINI_API_KEY" python3 scripts/strategize.py \
    "best content optimization tools" \
    "how to optimize content for SEO" \
    "content optimization software comparison"

# With domain analysis
GEMINI_API_KEY="$GEMINI_API_KEY" python3 scripts/strategize.py \
    "best content optimization tools" \
    "how to optimize content for SEO" \
    "content optimization software comparison" \
    --domain acme.com

# Load prompts from file
GEMINI_API_KEY="$GEMINI_API_KEY" python3 scripts/strategize.py --prompts-file my-prompts.txt --domain acme.com

# JSON output
GEMINI_API_KEY="$GEMINI_API_KEY" python3 scripts/strategize.py \
    "best CRM for startups" "CRM software comparison" "what CRM should I use" \
    --output json

Run from the skill directory. Resolve scripts/strategize.py relative to this SKILL.md.

Options

| Option | Default | Description | |--------|---------|-------------| | prompts | (positional) | Two or more prompts (3+ recommended) | | --prompts-file | (none) | File with one prompt per line (combined with positional) | | --domain | (none) | Domain to analyze (e.g., example.com) | | --runs | 20 | Runs per prompt | | --model | gemini-3-flash-preview | Gemini model to use | | --concurrency | 5 | Max parallel API calls (keep ≤5) | | --output | text | Output format: text or json |

Output

Text Output

Multi-Prompt Strategy
Model: gemini-3-flash-preview | Runs per prompt: 20
Prompts analyzed: 3

PER-PROMPT TOP DOMAINS:
======================================================================

  "best content optimization tools" (20 runs):
    85% — acme.com
    70% — surferseo.com
    55% — semrush.com

  "how to optimize content for SEO" (20 runs):
    75% — acme.com
    65% — searchenginejournal.com
    50% — moz.com

  "content optimization software comparison" (20 runs):
    80% — g2.com
    70% — acme.com
    55% — surferseo.com

AUTHORITY HUB PAGES (cited for 2+ prompts):
======================================================================

  🏆 https://acme.com/blog/content-optimization-guide
     Title: The Complete Guide to Content Optimization
     Hub score: 100% (3/3 prompts)
     Avg citation rate: 77%
     Per prompt:
       85% — "best content optimization tools"
       75% — "how to optimize content for SEO"
       70% — "content optimization software comparison"

  🏆 https://surferseo.com/blog/content-optimization/
     Hub score: 67% (2/3 prompts)
     Avg citation rate: 63%
     ...

AUTHORITY HUB DOMAINS (present for 2+ prompts):
======================================================================
  100% — acme.com (3/3 prompts, avg 77%)
   67% — surferseo.com (2/3 prompts, avg 63%)
   67% — semrush.com (2/3 prompts, avg 45%)

SINGLE-PROMPT WINNERS (high rate, but only one prompt):
======================================================================
  80% — g2.com: https://g2.com/categories/content-optimization
         Only wins: "content optimization software comparison"

DOMAIN STRATEGY: acme.com
======================================================================
  Authority hub pages (1):
    🏆 https://acme.com/blog/content-optimization-guide
       3/3 prompts, avg 77%
  Single-prompt winners: None
  Not cited for (0 prompts)

  RECOMMENDATIONS:
    1. Your best hub page is cited for 3/3 prompts. Strengthen this
       page to maintain its authority hub status.

JSON Output

Structured JSON with authority_hubs, domain_hubs, single_prompt_winners, cross-prompt citation matrix, and domain_analysis.

How It Works

  1. Runs each prompt 20 times against Gemini with Google Search grounding
  2. For each prompt, extracts all cited URLs and domains with their citation rates
  3. Cross-references: which URLs/domains appear across multiple prompts
  4. Identifies authority hubs — individual URLs cited for 2+ different prompts
  5. Calculates hub scores: what percentage of prompts cite each URL/domain
  6. Identifies single-prompt winners — pages that dominate one prompt but don't appear elsewhere
  7. If --domain provided: shows which of your pages are hubs, singles, or absent — and recommends strategy

Strategy Concepts

| Concept | Meaning | |---------|---------| | Authority Hub | A single URL cited for multiple prompts — the model retrieves it across diverse queries | | Hub Score | Percentage of analyzed prompts that cite a URL (higher = more authoritative) | | Single-Prompt Winner | Cited strongly for one prompt but not others — focused but not a hub | | Domain Hub | A domain that appears across multiple prompts (may use different URLs per prompt) |

Tips

  • Use related prompts — pick 3-5 prompts that are topically related but phrased differently. This reveals whether the model sees them as the same topic (citing the same pages) or different (citing different pages).
  • Hub pages are more efficient — one comprehensive page that wins 5 prompts is better than 5 separate pages that each win one. Authority hubs get more total retrieval exposure.
  • Don't force it — if prompts are genuinely different topics, separate pages are correct. Hub strategy works for prompts that share a topical core.
  • Build toward hub status — if you have single-prompt winners, consider expanding those pages to cover adjacent prompts. The entity extractor can show you what entities to add.
  • Pair with aeo-source-authority-profiler to understand the on-page profile of existing authority hubs
  • Pair with aeo-cannibalization-detector to check if your multiple pages are competing (cannibalization) or complementary (different prompts)
  • Pair with aeo-content-free to create or expand hub pages that target multiple prompts

References

Notes

  • Gemini API key stored in macOS Keychain under google-api-key
  • Minimum 2 prompts required; 3+ recommended for meaningful cross-prompt analysis
  • Prompts file supports comments (#) and blank lines
  • Retries API calls up to 5 times with exponential backoff
  • API cost scales with prompt count: N prompts × 20 runs = N×20 API calls

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.