skill-psyduckler-aeo-skills-aeo-pack-ai-tools · by Install
$ agentstack add skill-psyduckler-aeo-skills-aeo-pack-ai-tools ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
AEO Pack: AI Tools
> Source: github.com/psyduckler/aeo-skills > Part of: AEO Skills Suite (v2 prompt packs) > Schema: prompt-pack-v1
17 ready-to-track prompts for AI-tool visibility. The AI-tool space has its own retrieval patterns — buyers compare against incumbents (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini), worry about hallucination, and care about pricing/privacy more than typical B2B SaaS.
Template variables
| Variable | Required | Example | |---|---|---| | task | yes | content writing, code generation, image editing, customer support, legal research | | competitor | no | ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, GitHub Copilot | | use_case | no | long-form blog posts, unit test generation, legal contract review | | domain | no | legal, medical, finance, education |
How to use this pack
npx skills add psyduckler/aeo-skills --skill aeo-pack-ai-toolsThen fill in variables and merge into your aeo.config.json. Example for a content-writing AI tool competing with ChatGPT:
| Template | Filled | |---|---| | Best AI tools for {{task}} | Best AI tools for content writing | | {{competitor}} alternatives for {{task}} | ChatGPT alternatives for content writing | | Most accurate AI {{task}} tool | Most accurate AI content writing tool | | AI {{task}} tools that don't hallucinate | AI content writing tools that don't hallucinate |
Why these prompts
AI-tool AEO has unique retrieval characteristics:
- Incumbent comparison is dominant. Almost every category-discovery prompt eventually narrows to "X vs ChatGPT" or "X vs Claude". Tracking these directly is essential.
- Hallucination concerns are a category-defining trust signal. Pages addressing accuracy/reliability get higher citation rates for "most accurate" prompts.
- Pricing transparency matters because AI tools vary widely (free, freemium, pay-per-use, subscription). The "free vs paid" comparison is a high-traffic prompt.
- Vertical positioning ("AI for legal", "AI for medical") gets surfaced when domain-specific accuracy/compliance constraints matter.
- Open-source / privacy alternatives are a distinct retrieval cluster — buyers who care about self-hosting or data sovereignty.
Notes
- If your tool is a Gemini-based product, expect Gemini to be measurably more generous about citing pages that mention Gemini directly. Don't game this — but be aware of the recurring retrieval set bias.
- The "doesn't hallucinate" prompts are noisy — citation rates fluctuate as Gemini's framing of hallucination changes. Sample at N=50 here for tighter signal.
- Pair with [aeo-schema](../aeo-schema/) using
ProductorSoftwareApplicationJSON-LD to make your pricing/features machine-readable. - Suggested first-baseline scope: 10 prompts × 20 samples = ~$0.06 estimated cost.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: psyduckler
- Source: psyduckler/aeo-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.