Install
$ agentstack add skill-qretaio-skills-trash-tv ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Prestige Trash Analysis
Analyst Mode: TV/Movie Prestige vs. Trash Evaluation
Iron Law
Prestige Trash is defined by the COMBINATION of high production values (prestige) AND highly contrived, melodramatic storytelling (trash). A show can be good or bad on its own merits, but Prestige Trash is something specifically designed to feel important while delivering soapy gratification. NEVER confuse quality with prestige trashiness.
Workflow Checklist
Always follow this sequence:
- ⚠️ REQUIRED: One-paragraph verdict
- What is this project trying to be?
- What is it actually delivering?
- Is it highly bingeable or addictive? Why?
- ⚠️ REQUIRED: Prestige polish checklist (0-2 each, max 8)
- A-list cast / "serious actor" signaling
- Expensive look (cinematography, exotic locations, lush sets/costumes)
- Self-serious tone / important-messaging posture
- Premium backing / Awards-bait packaging
- ⚠️ REQUIRED: Trash engine checklist (0-2 each, max 12)
- Plot runs on twists/reveals/cliffhangers over character logic
- Melodrama dialed to 11 (betrayals, secret pasts, scandals)
- Motivations flimsy or change to serve next episode's plot
- Mystery-box storytelling or plot falls apart on scrutiny
- Heavy reliance on coincidence or contrivance
- "Meaning" asserted via heavy-handed monologues
- ⚠️ REQUIRED: Enjoyment vs. quality ratings (1-10 each)
- Addictiveness / Bingeability
- Coherence
- Depth
- ⚠️ REQUIRED: Decision rule application
- Prestige Trash: Prestige ≥ 5 AND Trash ≥ 6, especially if Addictiveness ≥ 7
- Prestige (not trash): Prestige ≥ 5 AND Trash ≤ 4
- Trash (not prestige): Prestige ≤ 4 AND Trash ≥ 6
- Mixed: Otherwise
- ⚠️ REQUIRED: Evidence section (3 specific moments)
- Moment 1: Scene/episode that highlights prestige/trash dynamic
- Moment 2: Another pivotal moment supporting your analysis
- Moment 3: Final decisive example
- ⚠️ REQUIRED: Final one-liner for sharing
- "[Title] is pure [classification] because it combines [polish/aesthetics] with [trash engine/soapy plot], and it is [bingeable/not] despite [key flaw]."
Prestige Trash Classification
| Criteria | Prestige | Trash | Classification | | ----------- | -------- | ----- | -------------------- | | High polish | 5-8 | 0-4 | Prestige (not trash) | | High trash | 0-4 | 6-12 | Trash (not prestige) | | Both high | 5-8 | 6-12 | PRESTIGE TRASH | | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed |
What to Look For
Prestige Signifiers
- Award-winning actors taking roles
- Cinematic quality cinematography
- Exotic international locations
- Period-specific sets and costumes
- Auteur director involvement
- Critical festival pedigree
- Marketing campaigns emphasizing "important themes"
Trash Signifiers
- Plot contrivances (car crashes, amnesia, secret twins)
- Melodramatic dialogue ("I can't breathe without you!")
- Sudden motivation shifts for shock value
- Unearned cliffhangers
- Heavy-handed metaphor/monologue
- "But wait, there's more!" season endings
- Entertainment masquerading as profundity
Common Missteps to Avoid
❌ Confusing critical acclaim with Prestige Trash ❌ Ignoring the bingeability factor ❌ Overvaluing one checklist item ❌ Missing the tension between polish and trash ❌ Vague examples without specific scenes/episodes
Output Format
Follow exactly:
- Title and format header
- One-paragraph verdict (4-6 sentences)
- Checklist scores with justifications
- Enjoyment ratings with reasoning
- Decision rule applied
- Three cited moments with explanations
- Final one-liner (shareable summary)
Notes
- Prestige Trash exists on a spectrum; many great shows have trash elements
- Some shows succeed precisely by balancing prestige and trash
- The classification is about the show's strategy and effect, not pure quality
- Bingeability is key: if it's boring but self-serious, it's not Prestige Trash
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: qretaio
- Source: qretaio/skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://qreta.io/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.