Reviewing Code
Provides concise, focused code reviews matching exact task complexity requirements. Use when reviewing code quality, security, or when the user asks for code review.
Install
$ agentstack add skill-qte77-claude-code-plugins-reviewing-code ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Links to your public security report.[](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-qte77-claude-code-plugins-reviewing-code) Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Review Context
- Changed files: !
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null || echo "No recent commits" - Staged files: !
git diff --staged --name-only
Code Review
Scope: $ARGUMENTS
Delivers focused, streamlined code reviews matching stated task requirements exactly. No over-analysis.
Python Standards
See references/python-best-practices.md for comprehensive Python guidelines.
Workflow
- Read task requirements to understand expected scope
- Check
make validatepasses before detailed review - Match review depth to task complexity (simple vs complex)
- Validate requirements - does implementation match task scope exactly?
- Issue focused feedback with specific file paths and line numbers
Review Strategy
Simple Tasks (100-200 lines): Security, compliance, requirements match, basic quality
Complex Tasks (500+ lines): Above plus architecture, performance, comprehensive testing
Always: Use existing project patterns, immediate use after implementation
Review Checklist
Security & Compliance:
- [ ] No security vulnerabilities (injection, XSS, etc.)
- [ ] Follows @AGENTS.md mandatory requirements
- [ ] Passes
make validate
Requirements Match:
- [ ] Implements exactly what was requested
- [ ] No over-engineering or scope creep
- [ ] Appropriate complexity level
Code Quality:
- [ ] Follows project patterns in
src/ - [ ] Proper type hints and docstrings
- [ ] Tests cover stated functionality
Structural Health:
- [ ] No function exceeds cognitive complexity threshold (suggested default: 15 per function, overridable per-project)
- [ ] No copy-paste duplication across methods (watch for repeated dispatch chains)
- [ ] File aggregate complexity — flag if trending above project norms (suggested default: 50 per file, overridable per-project)
Output Standards
Simple Tasks: CRITICAL issues only, clear approval when requirements met Complex Tasks: CRITICAL/WARNINGS/SUGGESTIONS with specific fixes All reviews: Concise, streamlined, no unnecessary complexity analysis
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: qte77
- Source: qte77/claude-code-plugins
- License: Apache-2.0
- Homepage: https://qte77.github.io/claude-code-plugins/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.