Install
$ agentstack add skill-r007b34r-opencode-obsidian-knowledge-workflow-vault-health-feedback ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
vault-health-feedback
Constraints
- NEVER scan whole vault; sample strategically
- NEVER give more than 3 recommendations
- Check layers in order: workflow -> cognitive -> structural
- NEVER equate structural mess with system failure (check workflow first)
- NEVER repair, move, or restructure without explicit confirmation
Trigger Boundary
Use when: vault feels archival, knowledge not returning, system health diagnosis needed, highest-leverage repair unclear, user says "vault is dead" or "nothing comes back."
Do NOT use for:
- Inbox routing ->
inbox-triage - Recent-note relationships ->
connection-review - Week-level synthesis ->
weekly-synthesis - Direct restructuring before diagnosis
- Promoting material ->
note-promotion
Boundaries
- Owns: workflow health diagnosis, cognitive return assessment, structural friction detection
- Delegates to:
inbox-triage(root cause is inbox backlog),opencode-context-maintenance(root cause is context drift) - Never absorbs: inbox routing, relationship analysis, synthesis, promotion, direct restructuring
Continuations
| Condition | Next skill | |-----------|-----------| | Root cause is inbox backlog | inbox-triage | | Root cause is context drift | opencode-context-maintenance | | Vault paths inaccessible, possible config issue | opencode-context-maintenance | | Vault is deeply archival, needs structural redesign | Escalate to human |
Companion Skill
All vault operations follow obsidian-mcp. Forbidden: obsidian_patch_note, obsidian_append_to_note. Verify every write through readback.
Procedure
Phase 1: Workflow Layer (always check first)
When assessing health metrics, read references/examples.md.
obsidian_list_notes path:"Inbox/"-> inbox freshness (items, age)obsidian_search_notes query:"type: synthesis"-> synthesis frequency- Check for recent triage/review/promotion activity
- Score: active / stale / dead
Phase 2: Cognitive Layer (only if workflow is active or stale)
- Sample 5-10 recent notes for reuse signals (links back, references)
- Check if themes recur across time windows
- Look for notes that were never revisited after creation
- Score: returning value / flat / declining
Phase 3: Structural Layer (only if cognitive layer shows issues)
- Check for orphan zones, hollow clusters, tag noise
- Identify fragmentation patterns
- Score: clean / messy but functional / blocking workflow
Phase 4: Recommend
When formatting diagnosis, read references/templates.md.
1-3 highest-leverage interventions, ranked. Report what NOT to do now.
Health Metrics Thresholds (expand for quantitative reference)
Workflow layer:
- Inbox items >30 days old = stale signal
- Synthesis frequency 40% unlinked notes = structural concern
- Tag entropy >50 tags with 4 with declining cognitive > structural blocking
- Stale workflow > flat cognitive > messy structural
- Active workflow with messy structure = healthy (do not intervene)
Gotchas
Gotcha 1: Starting from structure
What happens: Agent counts orphans and messy folders first Why it is wrong: Structural mess may be irrelevant if workflow is healthy Correct approach: Always check workflow -> cognitive -> structural in order
Gotcha 2: Too many recommendations
What happens: Agent gives 5-7 improvement suggestions Why it is wrong: No execution focus; user is overwhelmed Correct approach: Maximum 3 interventions, ranked by leverage
Gotcha 3: Diagnosis becomes cleanup
What happens: Agent starts moving/renaming/restructuring during diagnosis Why it is wrong: Unauthorized modification; diagnosis should inform, not act Correct approach: Report findings, recommend interventions, wait for confirmation
Validators (CI only, not runtime)
validators/pre-check.sh: Confirms vault is accessible for samplingvalidators/post-check.sh: Verifies cognitive -> structural)- No repair executed without confirmation
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: r007b34r
- Source: r007b34r/opencode-obsidian-knowledge-workflow
- License: Apache-2.0
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.