AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Write Conventional Commit

skill-ragnarok22-agent-skills-write-conventional-commit · by ragnarok22

Create Git commit messages that conform to Conventional Commits 1.0.0, including type/scope/description format, optional body, trailer-style footers, and explicit BREAKING CHANGE signaling. Use when users ask to draft commit messages, commit current changes, rewrite a commit message into conventional format, or enforce conventional commit standards in a repo.

No reviews yet
0 installs
17 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-ragnarok22-agent-skills-write-conventional-commit

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Write Conventional Commit? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Write Conventional Commit

Generate and apply Conventional Commits that follow the 1.0.0 specification.

Workflow

Step 1: Inspect commit scope

Run from repository root:

git status --short
git diff --staged --name-only
git diff --name-only

Use staged changes when available. If nothing is staged and the user asked to commit now, stage intentionally relevant files first and state what was staged.

Step 2: Classify intent into commit type

Pick the best type from change intent, not from file extension.

Common types:

  • feat: add a user-facing feature
  • fix: fix a bug
  • refactor: code change without new feature or bug fix
  • perf: improve performance
  • docs: documentation only
  • test: add/update tests
  • build: build/dependency tooling
  • ci: CI/CD configuration
  • chore: maintenance that does not fit above
  • revert: revert a previous commit

If uncertain between feat and fix, prefer:

  • fix when correcting broken behavior
  • feat when adding new behavior

Step 3: Choose optional scope

Scope is optional and should be short and stable.

Prefer one of:

  • top-level package/app (api, billing, auth)
  • subsystem (migrations, deps, release)
  • user-visible surface (checkout, search)

Avoid broad scopes like misc.

Step 4: Detect breaking changes

Mark breaking changes when diff indicates incompatible API/contract behavior.

Signals include:

  • removed/renamed public endpoints, fields, events, CLI flags
  • required inputs changed incompatibly
  • output schema changed incompatibly

When breaking:

  1. Add ! after type or type+scope (feat!: or feat(api)!:)
  2. Add footer: BREAKING CHANGE:

Use both when possible for clarity.

Step 5: Compose message in spec format

Use this structure exactly:

[optional scope][!]: 

[optional body]

[optional footer(s)]

Formatting rules:

  • Header type must be lowercase noun.
  • Put a colon and single space after header prefix.
  • Keep description concise and specific.
  • Put one blank line between header and body.
  • Put one blank line between body and footers.
  • Footer tokens follow git trailer style (Token: value), except references may use Token #value.
  • Use BREAKING CHANGE: as the canonical breaking footer token.

Step 6: Create commit (when requested)

If user wants the commit executed, run non-interactively:

git commit -m "" -m "" -m "" -m ""

Only include -m blocks that are needed.

For multiline body/footer with precise formatting, use:

git commit -F /tmp/commit-msg.txt

Then report:

  • final commit header
  • commit hash
  • whether breaking change was marked

Quality checks

Before finalizing, verify:

  • Header matches [scope][!]: description
  • Type reflects intent correctly
  • Scope is helpful or omitted
  • Breaking changes are explicitly marked when applicable
  • Body explains why when context is not obvious
  • Footers are valid trailers and references are accurate

Output behavior

When user asks only for message suggestions, provide 1 recommended message and up to 2 alternatives.

When user asks to commit directly, proceed with staging/commit commands and then return commit result.

Reference

Read [references/conventional-commits-1.0.0.md](references/conventional-commits-1.0.0.md) for the normative checklist and examples.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.