AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Quality Baseline

skill-railly-skills-quality-baseline · by Railly

Baseline a repository before quality work. Use when asked to audit maintainability, reliability, performance, security, test quality, technical debt, or code health across a codebase; to identify and rank gaps before fixing them; or to compare quality state over time. Remain read-only on target source.

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-railly-skills-quality-baseline

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-railly-skills-quality-baseline)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
today

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Quality Baseline? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Quality baseline

Build an evidence ledger, not a generic score. A missing checked-in control is a gap in visible repository evidence, not proof that no organization-level control exists.

1. Freeze repository identity

Record repository path, remote identity, HEAD, branch, working-tree state, stack, package manager, instruction files, CI workflows, and exact verification commands. Preserve unrelated changes.

Complete when: another reader can reproduce the inspected state and commands.

2. Map critical paths and controls

Trace the user-visible and operational paths whose failure would matter. For each path, map:

  • functional contracts and external specifications;
  • test layers and whether they exercise the real boundary;
  • latency, throughput, memory, or size observability;
  • timeout, retry, cancellation, cleanup, recovery, and overload behavior;
  • dependency, secret, trust-boundary, and release controls;
  • supported runtimes, operating systems, renderers, or protocol surfaces.

Use history, churn, and change coupling only as prioritization evidence. A large or frequently edited file is not a defect by itself.

Complete when: every critical path has an evidence-backed control map or an explicit verification gap.

3. Prove or reject findings

For every candidate gap, capture:

  • exact evidence and affected contract;
  • plausible failure and impact;
  • confidence and important unknowns;
  • smallest useful verification;
  • fix effort and regression risk.

Reject code-smell findings that do not connect to a failure, change-safety cost, measurable bottleneck, or violated repository rule. Reject optimization claims without a workload and measurable symptom. Reject "add tests" without naming what the test must detect.

Complete when: every retained finding has a verification story and every investigated rejection has a reason.

4. Rank pilot work

Rank by impact, evidence strength, verification cost, fix risk, and reversibility. Prefer one bounded pilot whose result can be measured. Route:

  • measured bottlenecks to performance-proof;
  • weak regression protection to test-strength;
  • failure-path exposure to resilience-audit;
  • a selected defect to the repository's triage workflow.

Complete when: the top recommendation names the contract, evidence, first experiment, stop condition, and expected proof.

5. Deliver the baseline

Return a quality matrix, critical-path map, ranked findings, rejected findings, verification gaps, and next pilot. Include a machine-readable representation when the user requests a persistent or repeatable baseline. Do not change target source under this skill.

Complete when: the report distinguishes evidence, inference, and unknowns, and contains no synthetic global quality score.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.