Install
$ agentstack add skill-railly-skills-record-a-case ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Record a case
Treat the case as an evidence ledger. Preserve what happened before extracting a method. Promotion is a separate process.
Canonical write root
Before writing, resolve the canonical Railly/skills checkout through RAILLY_SKILLS_REPO, ~/Programming/railly/skills, or ~/railly-skills. The canonical resolver is scripts/resolve-source-root.mjs. Never write a case, eval, or log into the current repo's .agents/skills, .claude/skills, another installed skill copy, or the target repository. If the source root is unavailable, return the draft and report the blocked write.
1. Bound one case
Name the maintenance unit: one issue, PR, incident, review, disproven claim, or coherent batch with one transferable lesson. Split unrelated outcomes even when they occurred in the same session.
Complete when: every included outcome shares one mechanism and one transferable lesson.
2. Build the ledger
Inventory evidence before prose. Collect durable retrieval handles:
- repository, commit, branch, issue, and PR
- Issue Contract path, final state, and acceptance IDs when one exists
- exact command and behavior-specific output
- regression test and its fix-absent result
- restored green command
- built, installed, deployed, or serialized artifact check
- review and maintainer decision
Classify every material claim as retrievable evidence, unreviewed report, inference, or unknown. Recheck drift-prone state such as PR status, branch head, merge, and release. Session summaries supply leads.
Complete when: every material claim has a class and every drift-prone state has a dated check or is explicitly unknown.
3. Assign independent statuses
Record technical validation, human review, maintainer acceptance, and delivery independently.
For an agent-generated or synthetic backfill, default to:
Status: observed
Validation: unvalidated
Human review: pending
Maintainer acceptance: pending
Delivery: local
Advance each field only from evidence for that field. Branch existence, test behavior, human review, maintainer acceptance, and delivery remain separate facts.
Complete when: each status cites supporting evidence or retains its conservative default.
4. Extract the lesson
Describe the observed condition, red signal, method, outcome, and limits using the ledger's claim classes. State when the fix covers a failure family or mechanism proxy rather than the reporter's exact environment.
Choose the smallest provisional destination:
skill methodreference ruleexemplardeterministic checkbehavior evalcoverage gapno change
Complete when: the lesson states its evidence boundary and exactly one smallest destination is selected.
5. Pass the confidentiality gate
For a public case, retain public repositories and the author's public work. Sanitize secrets, customer data, private review text, internal chat, local paths, neighboring-project identity, and unapproved employer context. Ambiguous provenance routes the case to an approved private destination or a public coverage-gap record.
Complete when: every source is authorized for the chosen visibility and the public draft contains no private retrieval handle or identity.
6. Materialize the case
Read [the case schema and allowed values](references/template.md), then write to cases// under the canonical source root. Use another destination only when the user explicitly names it and it is not an installed skill copy. Follow the canonical corpus naming and validation rules. Without write authority, return the complete draft in the response.
Set human-review status only from explicit human feedback or retrievable review evidence. Present new agent-authored records as pending review.
When the case closes a live mission, update its canonical Issue Contract to Status: closed and record the case path and final delivery state. Do not fill missing proof retrospectively.
Complete when: the artifact passes the destination's validator, all schema fields are resolved, the live contract points to the case when applicable, and a reader can reconstruct the work from retrieval handles without trusting the narrative.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Railly
- Source: Railly/skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.