Install
$ agentstack add skill-railly-skills-test-strength ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Test strength
Execution is not protection. A strong test turns red when the guarded behavior is broken and exercises the layer where the claim lives.
1. Name the contract and defect
State the exact invariant, failure family, input classes, and runtime boundary. Identify which existing tests claim to protect it.
Complete when: a reader can describe the smallest wrong implementation the tests must reject.
2. Falsify the protection
In a reversible isolated change, remove the fix, invert the condition, or introduce the smallest representative fault. Run the narrow test first. Restore the source and rerun it green.
Do not accept a red caused by compilation failure, unrelated setup, or a different assertion.
Complete when: the intended assertion fails for the intended reason without the fix and passes after restoration.
3. Probe beyond the example
Choose methods from the contract:
- mutation testing for changed or critical logic;
- property-based generation for invariants and equivalence classes;
- bounded fuzzing at structured untrusted-input boundaries;
- reference-contract comparison for external semantics;
- deterministic seeds and replayable shrunk counterexamples.
Scope campaigns to actionable code. Treat surviving mutants in critical changed logic as leads. Do not chase a universal mutation or coverage percentage.
Complete when: generated failures are reproducible and survivors are killed, justified, or recorded as gaps.
4. Exercise the real boundary
Use integration tests for package, renderer, database, process, protocol, filesystem, or browser boundaries. Verify built, installed, bundled, serialized, or deployed artifacts when the claim depends on them.
Complete when: the test reaches the same layer as the user-visible claim, or the unavailable layer is named as a verification gap.
5. Check determinism and cost
Repeat new tests, control clocks, randomness, ports, and external state, and record runtime. Put fast changed-code checks in the pull-request path and broader mutation or fuzz campaigns in scheduled runs.
Complete when: the test is reproducible, replayable, and placed at a sustainable cadence.
6. Report strength
Report the contract, fix-absent red evidence, restored green evidence, mutation or property results, boundary exercised, remaining survivors, and verification gaps.
Complete when: no claim of protection relies only on coverage or a green suite.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Railly
- Source: Railly/skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.