AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Market Competitors

skill-rediumvex-ai-marketing-claude-market-competitors · by rediumvex

Competitor intelligence scan covering positioning, pricing, messaging, social proof, and historical evolution via Wayback Machine. Invoke whenever the user says "competitors", "competitive analysis", "how do we stack up", "alternatives to", or runs `/market competitors <url>`. Produces COMPETITOR-ANALYSIS.md with a side-by-side matrix and specific differentiation plays.

No reviews yet
0 installs
50 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-rediumvex-ai-marketing-claude-market-competitors

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-rediumvex-ai-marketing-claude-market-competitors)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
5mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Market Competitors? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Market Competitors — Competitive Intelligence

Identify 3–5 relevant competitors, analyze their public-facing marketing, and tell the client where to attack and where to defend.

Step 1 — Identify competitors

Sources in order:

  1. Ask the user if they already have a list.
  2. Run scripts/analyze_page.py on the client's homepage for vocabulary.
  3. Use WebSearch for: " vs", " alternatives", "best ", " tools".
  4. Pick the top 3–5 competitors that are actually competing for the same user, not just in the same category.

State your selection and why before running the analysis.

Step 2 — Scan each competitor

Run python3 scripts/competitor_scanner.py on each (or use analyze_page.py if the scanner errors). For each competitor capture:

| Field | Source | |---|---| | Hero headline | H1 or first large text | | Subhead / value prop | Paragraph under H1 | | Primary CTA text | Most prominent button | | Pricing (if visible) | Pricing page | | Social proof | Logos, counts, reviews, testimonials | | Positioning archetype | See below | | Content cadence (if blog) | Last 3 post dates | | Tech/tracking stack | Scripts detected |

Step 3 — Historical evolution (Wayback Machine)

For the client and each competitor, fetch:

https://web.archive.org/web/2023*/
https://web.archive.org/web/2024*/

Compare the 2023 hero to the 2025 hero. Has their positioning shifted? Did they pivot? This is often where you spot pricing changes, audience pivots, or abandoned features. (Skip gracefully if the Wayback Machine fails.)

Step 4 — Positioning matrix

Plot every competitor plus the client on a 2×2 (pick the two most relevant axes for the category):

  • SaaS: Simplicity ↔ Power × Price
  • E-com: Premium ↔ Value × Niche ↔ Mass
  • Agency: Specialist ↔ Generalist × Boutique ↔ Enterprise
  • Creator: Entertainment ↔ Education × Broad ↔ Niche

Step 5 — Comparison matrix

| | Client | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C | |---|---|---|---|---| | One-liner | | | | | | Target audience | | | | | | Price anchor | | | | | | Primary CTA | | | | | | Social proof | | | | | | Key differentiator | | | | | | Weakness | | | | |

Step 6 — White space analysis

Answer these explicitly:

  1. What does every competitor claim? (table stakes — the client must match these)
  2. What does no competitor own? (white space — the client should claim this)
  3. Where is the client's current position ambiguous or overlapping? (risk)
  4. Which competitor is most vulnerable, and why? (attack opportunity)

Step 7 — Differentiation plays

Give 3–5 concrete plays. Each play has: the claim, the evidence needed to back it, and the channel to land it in.

Example: > Claim: "Set up in 90 seconds — the fastest onboarding in category." > Evidence needed: Timed onboarding video, signed testimonials, comparison table. > Channel: Hero H1, G2 category page, paid search ads targeting competitor brand terms.

Output: COMPETITOR-ANALYSIS.md

# Competitive Analysis — [Client]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Competitors analyzed:** [A, B, C, ...]

## Market Snapshot
[2-3 sentences: category health, dominant positioning, where the client sits.]

## Positioning Matrix
[ASCII or described 2x2 with competitor placement]

## Comparison Matrix
[Full table]

## Competitor Deep Dives
### [Competitor A]
- URL, positioning, pricing, audience
- Strengths
- Weaknesses
- Historical shift (Wayback): [brief note or "no significant change"]

... repeat for each ...

## White Space
1. **Unclaimed:** [opportunity]
2. **Overclaimed:** [where everyone sounds the same]
3. **Vulnerable competitor:** [who and why]

## Differentiation Plays
1. **[Play]** — evidence needed, channel, expected outcome
...

## Recommendations
### This week
### This quarter

Quality Bar

  • Never invent competitor pricing, headcount, or revenue. If you can't verify it, don't cite it.
  • Quote actual headlines and CTAs so the client can audit your work.
  • Avoid the "they're strong in X, weak in Y" generic framing — name the specific page, page element, or campaign.
  • If the client is clearly stronger than all competitors, say so and focus on how to widen the lead.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.