AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Slop Radar

skill-renefichtmueller-slop-radar-superpowers-skill · by renefichtmueller

Detect AI slop patterns in generated text. Use before finalizing any prose, documentation, README, or written content to check for AI buzzwords, structural patterns, and generic filler. Returns a score and actionable replacements.

No reviews yet
0 installs
44 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-renefichtmueller-slop-radar-superpowers-skill

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-renefichtmueller-slop-radar-superpowers-skill)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Slop Radar? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Slop Radar

Scan text for AI-generated writing patterns before finalizing output.

When to Use

  • After generating documentation, READMEs, blog posts, or any prose
  • When reviewing or editing written content
  • Before committing markdown files
  • When user asks to "check for slop", "check quality", or "make it sound human"
  • Automatically after creating any substantial text output (500+ words)

How It Works

  1. Buzzword scan: Check against 245 English and 127 German AI phrases
  2. Structural patterns: Detect em-dash abuse, "Let me" starters, bullet overload, passive voice density, triple-adjective stacking, hedge phrases
  3. Score: 0-100 scale (100 = fully human, 0 = pure AI slop)

Instructions

When triggered, analyze the text (from $ARGUMENTS file path or the most recently generated prose):

Step 1: Identify the text to check

If $ARGUMENTS is a file path, read that file. Otherwise, check the most recently generated text output in the conversation.

Step 2: Run the slop scan

Check the text against these pattern categories:

Buzzwords (deduct 2 points each): "dive deep", "transformative", "journey", "landscape", "leverage", "cutting-edge", "holistic", "empower", "stakeholders", "synergy", "unprecedented", "robust", "streamline", "innovative", "paradigm", "ecosystem", "scalable", "game-changer", "best-in-class", "actionable", "at the end of the day", "in today's fast-paced", "it's worth noting", "moreover", "furthermore", "crucial", "pivotal", "seamless", "comprehensive", "elevate", "foster", "harness", "spearhead", "drive", "unlock", "reimagine", "navigate the complexities", "delve into", "underscore"

Structural Patterns (deduct 3-5 points each):

  • Sentences starting with "Let me..." or "Here's the thing..."
  • Em-dash abuse (more than 1 per 200 words)
  • Triple bullet point lists where a paragraph would work
  • Passive voice density above 30%
  • Paragraphs ending with punchy one-liners
  • "Not X -- it's Y" contrast structures
  • Rhetorical question followed by immediate answer

Bonuses (add points):

  • +5 for natural sentence length variation
  • +5 for concrete numbers, names, or specific examples
  • +3 for conversational tone without being forced

Step 3: Calculate and report score

Score: [X]/100  [RATING]

Rating scale:
  90-100  HUMAN          Clean, natural writing
  70-89   MOSTLY CLEAN   Minor AI signals
  50-69   SUSPICIOUS     Multiple AI patterns
  30-49   LIKELY AI      Strong AI writing signals
  0-29    PURE SLOP      Heavy buzzword and pattern use

Step 4: Show flagged items with replacements

For each flagged buzzword or pattern, suggest a concrete replacement:

| Found | Replacement | |-------|-------------| | "leverage" | "use" | | "cutting-edge" | (name the specific technology) | | "stakeholders" | (name the actual people: "customers", "engineers") | | "it's worth noting that" | (delete -- just state the thing) | | "dive deep into" | "look at" or "examine" | | "transformative" | (describe the actual change) | | "comprehensive" | (be specific about what it covers) | | "seamless" | (describe the actual experience) | | "robust" | (state what makes it reliable) | | "innovative" | (describe what is actually new) |

Step 5: Offer to rewrite

If score is below 70, offer to rewrite the flagged sections with concrete, specific language. Apply these principles:

  • Replace vague adjectives with specific facts
  • Replace buzzwords with plain words
  • Break formulaic structures
  • Add concrete examples where generalities exist
  • Use active voice with named subjects

Example Output

Slop Radar Results
------------------
Score: 42/100  LIKELY AI

Buzzwords (8 found):
  "transformative", "leverage", "cutting-edge", "holistic",
  "stakeholders", "ecosystem", "seamless", "robust"

Patterns (3 found):
  - Let-me starter (line 1)
  - Em-dash overuse (4 in 200 words)
  - Punchy one-liner ending (line 12)

Suggested rewrites provided for 11 items.
Rewrite flagged sections? [y/n]

Integration

For automated checking, slop-radar is available as a CLI tool:

npx slop-radar check     # Full analysis
npx slop-radar score     # Score only
npx slop-radar json      # Machine-readable output

License

MIT

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.