AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Well Architected Review

skill-ricmmartins-azure-sre-agent-skills-01-well-architected-review · by ricmmartins

Run a Well-Architected Framework (WAF) review against Azure resources in scope. Use when asked about best practices, architecture review, WAF assessment, or pillar compliance (Reliability, Security, Cost, Operational Excellence, Performance Efficiency).

No reviews yet
0 installs
17 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-ricmmartins-azure-sre-agent-skills-01-well-architected-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-ricmmartins-azure-sre-agent-skills-01-well-architected-review)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
17d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Well Architected Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Well-Architected Review

Purpose

Perform a structured assessment of Azure resources against the five pillars of the Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework. Produce a scored report with prioritized recommendations.

When to use this skill

  • User asks "are we following best practices?"
  • User asks for a WAF or Well-Architected review
  • User wants to assess architecture quality before a launch or audit
  • Periodic (quarterly) architecture health check

Pillars and checks

1. Reliability

Run the following checks and report findings:

  1. Availability design: Check if critical workloads use availability zones or availability sets

``bash az vm list --query "[].{name:name, zones:zones, availabilitySet:availabilitySet.id}" -o table az appservice plan list --query "[].{name:name, zoneRedundant:zoneRedundant, sku:sku.name}" -o table ``

  1. Backup coverage: Verify Recovery Services vaults and backup policies exist for VMs, databases, and file shares

``bash az backup vault list -o table ` Then for each vault: `bash az backup item list --vault-name --resource-group --backup-management-type AzureIaasVM -o table ``

  1. Disaster recovery: Check for paired regions, ASR replication, or geo-redundant storage
  2. Health probes: Verify App Service health checks, load balancer probes, and Container Apps health endpoints
  3. Auto-healing: Check if App Service auto-heal rules or AKS pod disruption budgets are configured

2. Security

  1. Identity: Check for managed identities vs. stored credentials

``bash az webapp identity show --name --resource-group az ad app list --query "[].{name:displayName, passwordCredentials:passwordCredentials}" -o table ``

  1. Network isolation: Check for private endpoints, NSGs, and service endpoints

``bash az network private-endpoint list -o table az network nsg list -o table ``

  1. Encryption: Verify encryption at rest (storage, databases) and in transit (TLS)
  2. Key management: Check Key Vault usage and key/secret expiration dates

``bash az keyvault list -o table az keyvault secret list --vault-name --query "[].{name:name, expires:attributes.expires}" -o table ``

  1. Defender for Cloud: Check Secure Score and outstanding recommendations

3. Cost Optimization

  1. Rightsizing: Identify underutilized VMs (CPU -o table

```

  1. Deployment practices: Check for deployment slots, blue-green, or canary configurations
  2. Automation: Check for runbooks, Logic Apps, or scheduled tasks for routine operations

5. Performance Efficiency

  1. Autoscaling: Verify autoscale rules exist for App Service plans, VMSS, and Container Apps

``bash az monitor autoscale list --resource-group -o table ` Note: az monitor autoscale list requires --resource-group. Iterate over relevant resource groups, or use Azure Resource Graph: `bash az graph query -q "resources | where type == 'microsoft.insights/autoscalesettings'" -o table ``

  1. Caching: Check for Redis Cache or CDN usage on high-traffic workloads
  2. Database performance: Check DTU/vCore utilization, index recommendations
  3. Content delivery: Verify static assets use CDN or Front Door
  4. Connection pooling: Check for connection string patterns suggesting missing pooling

Scoring model

For each check, assign one of:

  • Pass — follows best practice
  • ⚠️ Needs attention — partially implemented or at risk
  • Fail — not implemented, risk exposure

Expected output

Report header (mandatory — use this exact format)

Well-Architected Review Report

| Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Subscription | (name + ID) | | Assessment Date | YYYY-MM-DD | | Overall Score | XX% |

Summary

A table with pillar scores:

| Pillar | Pass | Needs Attention | Fail | Score | |--------|------|----------------|------|-------| | Reliability | X | Y | Z | X/(X+Y+Z) % | | Security | ... | ... | ... | ... | | Cost Optimization | ... | ... | ... | ... | | Operational Excellence | ... | ... | ... | ... | | Performance Efficiency | ... | ... | ... | ... | | Overall | | | | avg % |

Detailed findings

For each pillar, list every check with:

  • Status (pass/attention/fail)
  • Evidence (command output or observation)
  • Recommendation (specific action to take)
  • Priority (Critical / High / Medium / Low)
  • Reference link to WAF documentation

Top 5 recommendations

Ordered by impact, with estimated effort (hours/days) for each.

Remediation guidance

For each ❌ or ⚠️ finding, include in the output:

  1. The specific az CLI command to remediate (suggest only — do not execute)
  2. Use GetAzCliHelp to validate the command syntax before suggesting
  3. The official Microsoft Learn documentation link for the remediation

References

  • WAF Overview: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/
  • Reliability: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/reliability/
  • Security: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/security/
  • Cost Optimization: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/cost-optimization/
  • Operational Excellence: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/operational-excellence/
  • Performance Efficiency: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/performance-efficiency/

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.