AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Ai Slop Cleaner

skill-rlaope-oh-my-hermes-ai-slop-cleaner · by rlaope

[omh] Hermes AI slop cleaner workflow: behavior-preserving cleanup.

No reviews yet
0 installs
7 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-rlaope-oh-my-hermes-ai-slop-cleaner

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Ai Slop Cleaner? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Ai Slop Cleaner

This is a Hermes-native ai-slop-cleaner workflow skill.

Why This Exists

ai-slop-cleaner exists to keep maintenance work explicit, evidence-backed, and inside the Hermes/executor boundary instead of relying on ad hoc chat narration.

Do Not Use When

  • The request is casual chat, a status-only acknowledgement, or another workflow has stronger routing evidence.
  • The user needs implementation, review, CI, merge, or external publishing evidence that has not been delegated or observed.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: $ai-slop-cleaner remove duplicated router branches and lock behavior with regression tests before refactoring.
  • Expected behavior: Plan cleanup, preserve behavior, delete or simplify code, and prove it with targeted tests.
  • Why: The request is maintenance cleanup with regression risk.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: ai-slop-cleaner: treat casual chat or unaccepted work as if this workflow already produced verified results.
  • Expected behavior: Ask a clarification question or route to a narrower workflow instead of forcing ai-slop-cleaner.
  • Why: The request lacks the required inputs or would overclaim work that Hermes did not observe.

Completion Checklist

  • The selected coding or runtime owner is named before any implementation claim.
  • Prepared handoff, dispatch, execution, verification, review, CI, and merge states are separated.
  • The final status cites observed runtime evidence or keeps the work preparednotobserved.
  • When Hermes is the selected coding owner, use hermes_coding_harness/v1 to keep builder, verifier, reviewer, docs, and PR lanes separate.
  • Report the current harness stage, owner, next action, and missing evidence without claiming PR creation, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge until matching runtime observations exist.

Recovery Notes

  • If the selected executor is unavailable, ask for Codex, Claude Code, Hermes, or another runtime before retrying.
  • If dispatch or result evidence is missing, keep the handoff preparednotobserved and expose the next observable action.

OMH Context Rail

  • This skill is part of OMH's Hermes workflow layer, not a standalone executor.
  • Product context: OMH is a Hermes-native workflow pack: choose skills, shape work, prepare artifacts, show status, and hand off with evidence boundaries.
  • Current lane: Coding handoff (idea-to-deploy, cto-loop, deploy-and-monitor, code-review, build-failure-triage, verification-gate, security-safety-review, ultrawork, +7 more) - coding owners, handoffs, review, CI, and merge evidence.
  • If the user intent belongs to another OMH lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow instead of force-fitting this skill.
  • Cross-skill context: every OMH skill: match lane; generic tool can render or execute.
  • Generic-tool checkpoint: image->img-summary; frontend->frontend/a11y/visual-qa; paper->paper-learning; content->content-operator; media->media-input-operator; file->materials-package; search->web-research; live->live-info-operator; audit->workspace/production/security; failures->build-failure; verify->verification-gate; code->codegraph/onboarding/ultraprocess.
  • Coverage: Every generated workflow skill carries this rail.
  • Normal users talk to Hermes; OMH CLI is infra.
  • Boundary: Prepared OMH routing, cards, handoffs, or artifacts are not observed execution, image generation, delivery, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

Use When

Use for behavior-preserving cleanup with tests before and after edits.

Strong routing signals: ai-slop-cleaner, $ai-slop-cleaner, cleanup, deslop, refactor, risky, behavior-preserving refactor, risk analysis, refactor workflow, legacy refactor, 리팩터링, 리팩토링, 위험 분석, 변경 범위 제한, 회귀 테스트

Catalog Metadata

Category: maintenance Phase: cleanup Hermes role: handoff-guide Quality tier: regression-gated

Quality bar:

  • Lock current behavior with regression checks before non-trivial cleanup.
  • Prefer deletion, reuse, and boundary repair over new abstractions.
  • Rerun verification after cleanup before claiming behavior is preserved.

Handoff policy:

Use Hermes to define cleanup scope and regression checks; route behavior-preserving edits to the selected coding runtime once tests are clear.

Executor readiness:

  • When accepted work mutates code, check executor_readiness/v1 for the selected Codex, Claude Code, Hermes, or oh-my runtime path before first dispatch.
  • If readiness is missing or blocked, ask the user to choose another coding agent, configure PATH, continue in Hermes, or keep a prompt/runtime handoff; retry only after that state changes.
  • A readiness probe is not dispatch, implementation, verification, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

Required inputs:

  • target smell
  • current behavior
  • regression checks

Expected outputs:

  • small cleanup diff
  • before/after verification
  • residual risk

Artifact expectations:

  • cleanup plan and regression evidence for non-trivial work

Safety rules:

  • Lock behavior with tests before risky cleanup.
  • Prefer deletion and existing utilities over new layers.
  • Do not add dependencies for cleanup unless explicitly requested.

Harness Discipline

  • Start from the representative harness registry in oh-my-hermes when the workflow needs coding, research, planning, goal execution, architecture, critique, QA, or documentation lanes.
  • Prefer richer evidence and clearer stop conditions over adding more workflow names.
  • Use specialist lanes only when they change the quality of the answer or verification.

Runtime Evidence

Preferred harness for this skill: coding-handling.

When local shell access or a bot wrapper is available, record metadata-only evidence:

omh runtime record --skill ai-slop-cleaner --harness coding-handling --status started
omh runtime delegate --run  --requested --not-observed --result not_observed

Record observed delegation results when Hermes or the wrapper exposes them. If delegation is unavailable, keep the result explicit as not_available or not_observed.

Hermes Compatibility Contract

  • Preserve the workflow intent, stop conditions, and verification discipline.
  • Use Hermes-native tools, file operations, and subagent/delegation features when available.
  • Do not require runtime tools, role prompts, or overlays that Hermes Agent does not expose.
  • Respect omh_target_topology/v1 when a wrapper reports it: bind state to the current target/thread, adapt only the parts of this workflow that benefit from multiple Hermes agents, and fall back to single-target behavior when active_agent_count is one.
  • When target topology changes from one to many or many to one, give a concise setup-change comment or use the wrapper's apply action before treating the new topology as persistent.
  • When wrapper metadata includes memory_review_card/v1 or handoff_context_pack/v1, treat it as reviewed OMH-local or wrapper-supplied context only. Use conflict-free context summaries to shape plans and handoffs, but do not claim Hermes internal memory was read or changed.
  • When a runtime-specific mechanism appears in imported instructions, translate it to a Hermes-native artifact:
  • goal tools -> .omh/goals/ ledgers, goal_completion_gate/v1, goal_status_card/v1, goal_continuation/v1, or explicit checklists with named next actions,
  • question renderers -> one concise question in the current Hermes interface,
  • native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes,
  • shell bridge commands -> optional bridge mode only.

Execution Rules

  1. Load supporting context with skills_list / skill_view when needed.
  2. State the workflow target, constraints, validation evidence, and stop condition.
  3. Keep progress evidence-backed.
  4. Verify with the smallest relevant test or inspection before claiming completion.
  5. If Hermes cannot provide a required runtime capability, say so and use the fallback above.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.