Install
$ agentstack add skill-rohasnagpal-legal-ai-skills-listing-obligations-checker ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Listing Obligations Checker (India)
Purpose
Convert an event or reporting period into a source-backed obligation map with exact triggers, deadlines, approvals, recipients, content, dependencies, and evidence of compliance.
Required inputs
Obtain:
- the listed entity, security type, recognised exchange or exchanges, market-cap category, and group structure;
- the event, decision, information, rumour, default, transaction, meeting, or reporting period being assessed;
- when the event occurred, when the entity learned of it, who knows, and whether it has changed;
- quantitative and qualitative materiality information, current materiality policy, and prior similar disclosures;
- board, committee, auditor, promoter, subsidiary, lender, regulator, and counterparty involvement; and
- any existing draft disclosure, confidentiality arrangement, trading-window status, leak, media report, or exchange query.
Treat entity classification, security, event facts, and timestamps as blocking. If facts remain fluid, issue a provisional analysis with an update trigger rather than a false final conclusion.
Method
- Retrieve the current official SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations, applicable master circular, amendments, SEBI circulars, exchange circulars and filing instructions. Record amendment and access dates; do not rely on an old consolidated copy.
- Identify adjacent regimes that may apply: insider trading and unpublished price sensitive information, takeover, issue and listing rules, buyback, delisting, debt securities, Companies Act, sector regulation, or exchange-specific requirements.
- Classify the entity and instrument. Determine which chapters, schedules, governance requirements, exemptions, market-cap bands, high-value debt rules, or subsidiary rules apply.
- Classify the event under each potentially applicable provision. Separate deemed material events, policy-tested events, subsidiary events, defaults, litigation, fraud, management changes, agreements, ratings, financial results, meetings, and periodic filings.
- Apply quantitative and qualitative materiality separately. Show the metric, period, source figure, calculation, policy threshold, aggregation, and qualitative rationale. Do not treat a failed numerical threshold as automatically non-material.
- Establish the disclosure clock from the legally relevant event or knowledge time. Show time zone, business or calendar treatment, intervening exchange hours, dependencies, and any reason for delay that itself must be explained.
- Determine required governance and controls: board or committee action, authorised disclosure officer, confidentiality, need-to-know access, structured records, trading-window restriction, pre-clearance, rumour verification, and response to leaks or exchange queries.
- Specify the disclosure package: exchanges, website, shareholders, newspaper, regulator, debenture trustee, depository or other recipient; required content; material attachments; update obligations; and retention period.
- Draft a disclosure only from verified facts. Separate confirmed fact, management estimate, forward-looking statement, confidentiality limitation, and information to follow.
- Create evidence of compliance: filing acknowledgement, timestamp, board record, materiality analysis, website capture, dissemination parity, insider list or access record, and follow-up calendar.
Output
Produce:
- Obligation decision table — source, trigger, applicability, deadline, approval, recipient, and status.
- Materiality analysis with calculations and qualitative factors.
- Disclosure timeline from event through updates and closure.
- Draft exchange disclosure, only if requested.
- Control and evidence checklist — UPSI, trading window, records, website, acknowledgements, and follow-up.
Guardrails
- Do not use remembered regulation numbers, thresholds, or deadlines without checking the current official text.
- Do not suppress or delay disclosure merely because a contract calls information confidential.
- Do not assume board approval is always the event time; identify the actual trigger under each provision.
- Do not describe information as public, immaterial, speculative, or not price sensitive without a recorded factual basis.
- Do not treat filing on one exchange, a press release, or a website post as satisfying every required channel without verification.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: rohasnagpal
- Source: rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.