Install
$ agentstack add skill-rohasnagpal-legal-ai-skills-statement-of-defence-drafter ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Statement of Defence Drafter
Purpose
Answer the actual case pleaded with precise admissions, denials, alternative cases, and evidence while preserving threshold objections and presenting any counterclaim as a complete claim in its own right.
Required inputs
Obtain the statement of claim and all exhibits, arbitration agreement, contract set, notice or request, procedural orders, governing law, respondent instructions, contemporaneous documents, payment and performance records, damages material, prior correspondence, and facts supporting any counterclaim or set-off.
Identify filing deadlines, amendment rules, whether jurisdiction has already been contested, the required pleading form, counterclaim fees, and any claim allegation the respondent cannot yet admit or deny after reasonable inquiry.
Method
- Create a response matrix for every numbered allegation: Admit, Deny, Not Admitted, Outside Knowledge, or Requires Qualification. Record the reason, respondent's positive case, supporting source, witness, and missing evidence.
- Address jurisdiction and admissibility first where required. Distinguish consent, scope, party status, tribunal constitution, conditions precedent, limitation, and other objections. Preserve an objection in the manner and time required by current law and rules; do not use a merits defence as an implied waiver without analysis.
- State the respondent's affirmative narrative in a concise chronology. A denial is not a substitute for the respondent's account of what happened.
- Answer each cause of action element by element: duty, performance, breach, attribution, causation, loss, and remedy. Plead contractual limitations, exclusions, waiver, variation, estoppel, force majeure, acceptance, mitigation, contributory conduct, set-off, or other defences only when factually and legally supported.
- Respond to quantum head by head. Test entitlement, causation, measure, proof, formula, inputs, currency, interest, duplication, mitigation, avoided costs, and contractual caps. Provide corrected calculations where possible.
- Plead alternative positions expressly and consistently. Explain their order; do not make accidental admissions by presenting an alternative without qualification.
- Draft each counterclaim separately with jurisdiction, material facts, legal basis, breach, causation, quantum, and relief. Verify notice, limitation, scope, fees, and permission requirements. Keep set-off distinct from counterclaim where the governing framework does.
- Identify document requests, witness evidence, and expert evidence necessary to prove the positive case or test the claim.
- Verify authorities from current primary sources and link every material factual assertion, quotation, and figure to the record.
- Run consistency checks across the defence, earlier correspondence, jurisdictional objections, counterclaim, calculations, and prayers.
Output
Produce:
- Statement of defence, aligned to the claim's numbering where practical.
- Jurisdiction and admissibility section, with reservations precisely stated.
- Counterclaim or set-off section, only if supported and requested.
- Response matrix and defence-evidence matrix.
- Quantum response schedule.
- Open-items list — evidence, instructions, law, procedural permissions, and deadlines.
Guardrails
- Do not use blanket denials where a specific answer can reasonably be given.
- Do not deny authentic documents or undisputed background merely for tactical appearance.
- Do not invent a positive case, counterclaim, payment, notice, authority, or calculation.
- Do not plead inconsistent alternatives without labelling them or obscure an admission with evasive language.
- Do not assume that a jurisdictional objection remains available; verify waiver, timing, and prior submissions.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: rohasnagpal
- Source: rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.