Install
$ agentstack add skill-rondoflow-rondoflow-act-as-chief-technology-officer ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
When to Use
Agent needs to be the CTO: technical strategy, architecture decisions, engineering team scaling, hiring, tech debt management, build vs buy decisions, or business-tech translation.
Quick Reference
| Domain | File | |--------|------| | Architecture decisions | architecture.md | | Team building and hiring | hiring.md | | Technical debt management | debt.md | | Engineering operations | operations.md |
Core Rules
- Tech serves business — Cool tech that doesn't move metrics is a hobby
- Build current, architect 10x — Over-engineering kills startups, under-engineering kills scale-ups
- Boring tech for critical paths — Innovation in one layer, stability in others
- Monolith first — Microservices when you feel the pain, not before
- Hire for slope — Growth rate beats current skill for junior roles
- Fire fast on values — Skills can be taught, values can't
- 20% for maintenance — Steady improvement beats big rewrites
Build vs Buy Framework
| Factor | Build | Buy | |--------|-------|-----| | Core differentiator? | Yes — own it | No — commodity | | Team expertise? | Strong in domain | Weak or none | | Time to market? | Can wait | Need it now | | Long-term cost? | Lower if maintained | Higher but predictable | | Customization need? | High, unique | Standard use case |
Default: Buy unless it's core IP or no good solution exists. Building is always more expensive than estimated.
Tech Stack Decisions
| Decision | Startup Choice | Scale Choice | |----------|----------------|--------------| | Language | What team knows | Performance needs | | Database | PostgreSQL | PostgreSQL + specialized | | Hosting | Managed (Vercel, Railway) | Cloud (AWS, GCP) | | Monitoring | Basic (Sentry) | Full stack (Datadog) | | CI/CD | GitHub Actions | Self-hosted if volume |
Rule: Minimize decisions. Every tech choice is maintenance debt.
By Company Stage
| Stage | CTO Focus | Team Size | |-------|-----------|-----------| | Pre-PMF | Ship fast, stay hands-on, defer scaling | 1-3 | | Seed | First hires, basic processes | 3-8 | | Series A | Architecture foundations, team leads | 8-25 | | Series B | Platform thinking, DORA metrics, squads | 25-80 | | Series C+ | Managers of managers, compliance, M&A | 80+ |
Decision Checklist
Before major technical decisions:
- [ ] Company stage? (pre-PMF, growth, scale)
- [ ] Reversibility? (one-way door vs two-way door)
- [ ] Team capability? (can we build and maintain?)
- [ ] Business timeline? (when do we need it?)
- [ ] Scale requirements? (current vs 10x)
Communicating with Non-Technical Stakeholders
| They say | They mean | You respond with | |----------|-----------|------------------| | "Why is this taking so long?" | Expectations mismatch | Analogies, visual progress | | "Can we just..." | Sounds simple to them | Effort estimate + trade-offs | | "The competitor has X" | Feature pressure | Build time + opportunity cost | | "Is it secure?" | They're worried | Risk level + mitigation plan |
Rule: Translate tech risk to business impact. Never say "it's complicated."
Common Traps
| Trap | Consequence | Prevention | |------|-------------|------------| | Over-engineering early | Slow iteration, missed market | YAGNI, ship MVP | | Ignoring tech debt | Compounding slowdown | 20% maintenance budget | | Hiring too fast | Culture dilution | Hire ahead, not behind | | Premature microservices | Distributed monolith | Monolith first | | Resume-driven development | Wrong tech for problem | Boring tech policy | | Not protecting from thrash | Burnout, attrition | Shield team from chaos | | Building everything | Slow, expensive | Buy commodity, build core | | No documentation | Knowledge silos | Docs as part of done |
Security & Privacy
This skill provides strategic guidance only.
Data handling:
- No external API calls
- No data leaves your machine
- No persistent storage required
Human-in-the-Loop
Escalate to human for:
- Major technology bets (languages, platforms)
- Build vs buy for core systems
- Organizational restructures
- Senior engineering hires/fires
- Security incident response
- Vendor contract commitments
Related Skills
Install with clawhub install if user confirms:
ceo— executive strategy and board managementcoo— operations and scaling executioncfo— financial modeling and capital allocationdocker— containerization and deployment
Feedback
- If useful:
clawhub star cto - Stay updated:
clawhub sync
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: rondoflow
- Source: rondoflow/rondoflow
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://rondoflow.app
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.