Install
$ agentstack add skill-rongarede-claude-skills-orchestration-exploration ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Exploration(CTO 质疑模式)
触发方式
- 用户说「/exploration」或「挑战这个方案」
- root 在发现 subagent 即将开始大规模实现时主动触发
核心理念
在编码前,以 CTO 视角质疑方案的合理性。写代码是最后一步,不是第一步。
质疑清单
1. 问题定义
- 我们真的需要解决这个问题吗?
- 这个问题的根因是什么?我们在治标还是治本?
- 不做会怎样?影响有多大?
2. 方案挑战
- 有没有更简单的方案?(YAGNI)
- 这个方案的最大风险是什么?
- 如果 6 个月后回来看,这个方案会让我们后悔吗?
- 有没有现成的工具/库能解决?
3. 成本评估
- 实现成本 vs 维护成本?
- 认知复杂度增加了多少?
- 对现有系统的侵入性有多大?
4. 替代方案
- 列出至少 2 个替代方案
- 每个方案的 trade-off 是什么?
- 为什么选择当前方案而非替代?
输出格式
## Exploration Report
### 问题
[一句话描述问题]
### 方案评估
- 当前方案:[描述] — 风险:[主要风险]
- 替代方案 A:[描述] — trade-off:[得失]
- 替代方案 B:[描述] — trade-off:[得失]
### 决策
[选择哪个方案,一句话理由]
### 行动
- [ ] [具体步骤 1]
- [ ] [具体步骤 2]
使用场景
| 场景 | 是否触发 | |------|---------| | 新建项目/模块 | 必须触发 | | 引入新框架/大型依赖 | 必须触发 | | 重构 > 100 行代码 | 建议触发 | | 简单 bug 修复 | 不需要 | | 文档更新 | 不需要 |
与 brainstorming skill 的关系
- brainstorming = 探索可能性、发散思维
- exploration = 质疑方案、收敛决策
- 推荐流程:brainstorming → exploration → 实施
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: rongarede
- Source: rongarede/claude-skills-orchestration
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.