Install
$ agentstack add skill-rongarede-claude-skills-research-research-analyst ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Research Analyst
Systematic research analysis skill that forms hypotheses, evaluates evidence, and produces structured analytical assessments.
Trigger Words
/research-analyst- "analyze this topic"
- "evaluate the evidence"
- "what does the research say about"
- "feasibility analysis"
- "systematic analysis"
Quick Start
- Define the research question and analytical scope
- Form initial hypotheses or analytical framework
- Gather and evaluate evidence (quality, relevance, recency)
- Synthesize findings into structured analysis
- Produce actionable recommendations with confidence levels
Core Workflow
Research Analyst Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Define research question and scope
- [ ] Step 2: Establish analytical framework
- [ ] Step 3: Evidence gathering and evaluation
- [ ] Step 4: Cross-reference and validate findings
- [ ] Step 5: Synthesize analysis with confidence ratings
- [ ] Step 6: Produce recommendations
Step 1: Define Research Question
- Clarify the specific question or problem to analyze
- Identify constraints: time, domain, depth
- Determine the decision this analysis will inform
- Identify key stakeholders and their information needs
Step 2: Analytical Framework
Choose and apply one or more frameworks:
| Framework | Best For | |-----------|----------| | SWOT | Strategic positioning, competitive analysis | | PESTEL | Macro-environment, policy impact | | Porter's Five Forces | Industry/market dynamics | | Root Cause Analysis | Problem diagnosis | | Cost-Benefit | Investment/decision justification | | Comparative Matrix | Technology/tool evaluation | | Literature Synthesis | Academic/research topics |
Step 3: Evidence Gathering
For each piece of evidence, record:
| # | Source | Type | Quality | Relevance | Key Finding |
|---|--------|------|---------|-----------|-------------|
| 1 | [source] | [primary/secondary/tertiary] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [finding] |
Quality Assessment Criteria:
- High: Peer-reviewed, primary data, recent ( 5 years), unverified claims
Step 4: Cross-Reference and Validate
- Triangulate findings across multiple sources
- Identify contradictions and resolve them
- Note gaps in available evidence
- Flag assumptions that cannot be verified
Step 5: Synthesis
Structure the analysis as:
## Analysis Summary
### Key Findings
1. [Finding with confidence level: HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
2. [Finding with confidence level]
### Evidence Strength
- Strong evidence supports: [claims]
- Moderate evidence suggests: [claims]
- Weak/insufficient evidence for: [claims]
### Contradictions and Uncertainties
- [Area of disagreement and possible explanations]
### Limitations
- [Scope limitations, data gaps, methodology constraints]
Step 6: Recommendations
## Recommendations
| Priority | Recommendation | Confidence | Evidence Basis | Risk if Ignored |
|----------|---------------|------------|----------------|-----------------|
| P1 | [action] | HIGH | [refs] | [risk] |
| P2 | [action] | MEDIUM | [refs] | [risk] |
Output Format
Always produce a structured document with:
- Executive Summary (2-3 sentences)
- Research Question (explicit statement)
- Methodology (frameworks used, sources consulted)
- Findings (organized by theme or hypothesis)
- Analysis (synthesis with confidence levels)
- Recommendations (prioritized, actionable)
- Appendix (evidence table, source list)
Integration with Other Skills
- Use
deep-researchfor initial evidence collection - Use
deep-thinkfor complex reasoning about ambiguous findings - Use
tech-scoutfor technology-specific evaluations - Feed results to
brainstormfor solution ideation
Anti-Patterns
- Do NOT present opinions as findings
- Do NOT cherry-pick evidence to support a predetermined conclusion
- Do NOT ignore contradictory evidence
- Do NOT conflate correlation with causation
- Do NOT make recommendations without stating confidence level
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: rongarede
- Source: rongarede/claude-skills-research
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.