AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Research Analyst

skill-rongarede-claude-skills-research-research-analyst · by rongarede

|

No reviews yet
0 installs
7 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-rongarede-claude-skills-research-research-analyst

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Research Analyst? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Research Analyst

Systematic research analysis skill that forms hypotheses, evaluates evidence, and produces structured analytical assessments.

Trigger Words

  • /research-analyst
  • "analyze this topic"
  • "evaluate the evidence"
  • "what does the research say about"
  • "feasibility analysis"
  • "systematic analysis"

Quick Start

  1. Define the research question and analytical scope
  2. Form initial hypotheses or analytical framework
  3. Gather and evaluate evidence (quality, relevance, recency)
  4. Synthesize findings into structured analysis
  5. Produce actionable recommendations with confidence levels

Core Workflow

Research Analyst Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Define research question and scope
- [ ] Step 2: Establish analytical framework
- [ ] Step 3: Evidence gathering and evaluation
- [ ] Step 4: Cross-reference and validate findings
- [ ] Step 5: Synthesize analysis with confidence ratings
- [ ] Step 6: Produce recommendations

Step 1: Define Research Question

  • Clarify the specific question or problem to analyze
  • Identify constraints: time, domain, depth
  • Determine the decision this analysis will inform
  • Identify key stakeholders and their information needs

Step 2: Analytical Framework

Choose and apply one or more frameworks:

| Framework | Best For | |-----------|----------| | SWOT | Strategic positioning, competitive analysis | | PESTEL | Macro-environment, policy impact | | Porter's Five Forces | Industry/market dynamics | | Root Cause Analysis | Problem diagnosis | | Cost-Benefit | Investment/decision justification | | Comparative Matrix | Technology/tool evaluation | | Literature Synthesis | Academic/research topics |

Step 3: Evidence Gathering

For each piece of evidence, record:

| # | Source | Type | Quality | Relevance | Key Finding |
|---|--------|------|---------|-----------|-------------|
| 1 | [source] | [primary/secondary/tertiary] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [finding] |

Quality Assessment Criteria:

  • High: Peer-reviewed, primary data, recent ( 5 years), unverified claims

Step 4: Cross-Reference and Validate

  • Triangulate findings across multiple sources
  • Identify contradictions and resolve them
  • Note gaps in available evidence
  • Flag assumptions that cannot be verified

Step 5: Synthesis

Structure the analysis as:

## Analysis Summary

### Key Findings
1. [Finding with confidence level: HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
2. [Finding with confidence level]

### Evidence Strength
- Strong evidence supports: [claims]
- Moderate evidence suggests: [claims]
- Weak/insufficient evidence for: [claims]

### Contradictions and Uncertainties
- [Area of disagreement and possible explanations]

### Limitations
- [Scope limitations, data gaps, methodology constraints]

Step 6: Recommendations

## Recommendations

| Priority | Recommendation | Confidence | Evidence Basis | Risk if Ignored |
|----------|---------------|------------|----------------|-----------------|
| P1 | [action] | HIGH | [refs] | [risk] |
| P2 | [action] | MEDIUM | [refs] | [risk] |

Output Format

Always produce a structured document with:

  1. Executive Summary (2-3 sentences)
  2. Research Question (explicit statement)
  3. Methodology (frameworks used, sources consulted)
  4. Findings (organized by theme or hypothesis)
  5. Analysis (synthesis with confidence levels)
  6. Recommendations (prioritized, actionable)
  7. Appendix (evidence table, source list)

Integration with Other Skills

  • Use deep-research for initial evidence collection
  • Use deep-think for complex reasoning about ambiguous findings
  • Use tech-scout for technology-specific evaluations
  • Feed results to brainstorm for solution ideation

Anti-Patterns

  • Do NOT present opinions as findings
  • Do NOT cherry-pick evidence to support a predetermined conclusion
  • Do NOT ignore contradictory evidence
  • Do NOT conflate correlation with causation
  • Do NOT make recommendations without stating confidence level

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.