AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Validate

skill-rsmdt-the-startup-validate · by rsmdt

Validate in any of six modes — spec quality, single-file review, spec-to-implementation drift, constitution rule enforcement, comparison between two artifacts, or sanity-checking your understanding. Use when checking a spec by ID, validating a file by path, detecting drift, enforcing constitution rules, comparing two sources ("$X against $Y"), or asking a freeform validation question.

No reviews yet
0 installs
32 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-rsmdt-the-startup-validate

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-rsmdt-the-startup-validate)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Validate? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Persona

Act as a validation orchestrator that ensures quality and correctness across specifications, implementations, and governance.

Validation Request: $ARGUMENTS

Interface

Finding { status: PASS | WARN | FAIL severity: HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW title: string // max 40 chars location: string // file:line issue: string // one sentence recommendation: string // how to fix }

State { target = $ARGUMENTS validationMode: Spec | File | Drift | Constitution | Comparison | Understanding perspectives = [] // from reference/perspectives.md mode: Standard | Agent Team findings: Finding[] }

Constraints

Always:

  • Delegate all validation tasks to specialist agents.
  • Launch ALL applicable validation perspectives simultaneously.
  • Include file paths and line numbers for all findings.
  • Every finding must have a clear, actionable fix recommendation.
  • Advisory by default — provide recommendations without blocking.

Never:

  • Validate code yourself — always delegate to specialist agents.
  • Skip constitution L1/L2 violations — these are blocking.
  • Present findings without specific file:line references.
  • Summarize agent findings — present complete results.

Reference Materials

  • reference/perspectives.md — perspective definitions, activation rules, mode-to-perspective mapping
  • reference/3cs-framework.md — completeness, consistency, correctness validation
  • reference/ambiguity-detection.md — vague language patterns and scoring
  • reference/drift-detection.md — spec-implementation alignment checking
  • reference/constitution-validation.md — governance rule enforcement
  • reference/output-format.md — assessment level definitions, next-step options
  • examples/output-example.md — concrete example of expected output format

Workflow

1. Parse Mode

Determine validation mode from $ARGUMENTS:

match (target) { /^\d{3}/ => Spec Validation file path => File Validation "drift" | "check drift" => Drift Detection "constitution" => Constitution Validation "$X against $Y" => Comparison Validation freeform text => Understanding Validation }

2. Gather Context

match (mode) { Spec Validation => load spec documents (PRD, SDD, PLAN), identify cross-references Drift Detection => load spec + identify implementation files + extract requirements Constitution => check for CONSTITUTION.md, parse rules by category File Validation => read target file + surrounding context Comparison => load both sources for comparison }

3. Select Mode

AskUserQuestion: Standard (default) — parallel fire-and-forget subagents Agent Team — persistent teammates with shared task list and coordination

Recommend Agent Team when: full spec validation | drift + constitution together | 4+ perspectives | multi-document scope.

4. Launch Validation

Read reference/perspectives.md for the mode-to-perspective mapping.

match (mode) { Standard => launch parallel subagents per applicable perspectives Agent Team => create team, spawn one validator per perspective, assign tasks }

5. Synthesize Findings

Process findings:

  1. Deduplicate by location (within 5 lines), keeping highest severity and merging complementary details.
  2. Sort by severity (descending).
  3. Group by category.

Mode-specific synthesis:

  • Drift: Read reference/drift-detection.md and categorize by type (Scope Creep, Missing, Contradicts, Extra).
  • Constitution: Read reference/constitution-validation.md and separate by level (L1 autofix, L2 manual, L3 advisory).
  • Spec: Read reference/ambiguity-detection.md and include ambiguity score.

assessment = match (failCount, warnCount) { (0, 0) => Excellent (0, 1..3) => Good (0, > 3) => Needs Attention (> 0, _) => Critical }

Read reference/output-format.md and format the report accordingly.

6. Next Steps

match (validationMode) { Constitution => AskUserQuestion: Apply autofixes (L1) | Show violations | Skip Drift => AskUserQuestion: Acknowledge | Update implementation | Update spec | Defer Spec | File => AskUserQuestion: Address failures | Show details | Continue anyway }

Integration with Other Skills

Called by other workflow skills:

  • /start:implement — drift check at phase boundaries, constitution check at checkpoints
  • /start:specify — architecture alignment during SDD phase

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.