AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Team Infrastructure

skill-saemihemma-lead-producer-oss-team-infrastructure · by saemihemma

Infrastructure team: deployment safety, capacity, observability, platform setup, and data-operational risk in one production-readiness assessment.

No reviews yet
0 installs
14 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-saemihemma-lead-producer-oss-team-infrastructure

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Team Infrastructure? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Infrastructure Team

Purpose

Judge whether a system can be deployed, observed, scaled, and recovered safely in production.

Composition

  • role-devops-engineer: release flow, observability, incident readiness
  • role-railway-deployment: Railway-specific deployment, platform risk
  • role-scalability-engineer: capacity, bottlenecks, load behavior
  • role-security-engineer: security posture, operational exposure
  • role-data-engineer: data reliability, operational data-surface risk
  • Synthesis: conflict handling, acceptance

Use When

  • Auditing production readiness or deployment risk
  • Reviewing infrastructure after incident or before major launch
  • Checking scaling, observability, rollback, platform setup together

Do NOT Use When

  • Feature implementation or product prioritization
  • Code quality with no production-operations angle
  • Architecture design with no deployment concern

Workflow

  1. Map release path, runtime dependencies, recovery path.
  2. Review deployment safety, observability, scale, security, data ops together.
  3. Make cost, risk, operational complexity trade-offs explicit.
  4. Synthesize one production-readiness verdict.

Default Output

INFRASTRUCTURE REVIEW
=====================
Deployment: release/rollback risks
Operations: observability/incident-readiness gaps
Scale/Data: capacity risks, data-operational concerns
Security: operational security blockers
Recommendation: ready / rework / escalate, required fixes

Conflict Resolution

  • DevOps Engineer owns release flow and rollback decisions. Security Engineer can block on operational exposure.
  • Scalability Engineer owns capacity assessment. Railway Deployment Engineer owns platform-specific constraints.
  • Data Engineer owns data-operational risk. When deployment urgency conflicts with security, security wins.

Anti-Drift Rules

  • Do not expand into application architecture under infrastructure review label.
  • Treat rollback failures and observability gaps as release blockers, not follow-ups.
  • Cost analysis is part of the verdict, not a separate nice-to-have.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.