— No reviews yet
0 installs
9 views
0.0% view→install
Install
$ agentstack add skill-samilozturk-agentlint-code-quality-review ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Are you the author of Code Quality Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claimAbout
Skill: Code Quality Review
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- reviewing a PR or local diff in this repo
- checking strict TypeScript and lint compliance
- validating docs/tests/context alignment for public surface changes
- looking for risky regressions in CLI, MCP, core, or shared packages
Purpose
Apply Agent Lint's repository-specific review standards so changes stay type-safe, testable, documented, and aligned with public behavior.
Scope
Included
- TypeScript correctness
- public-surface drift
- docs/test alignment
- context-artifact maintenance triggers
- package boundary and dependency-flow checks
Excluded
- subjective style nitpicks without repository evidence
- unrelated product strategy decisions
Inputs
diff-summarytouched-filespublic-surface-change: yes/noreview-goal
Step-by-step Execution
- Read the touched files and classify them by package and responsibility.
- Check dependency direction:
shared <- core <- mcpandshared <- core <- cli. - Look for strict-typing violations, missing tests, stale docs, or public-surface drift.
- If CLI commands, MCP tools/resources, or supported clients changed, require docs/test updates in the same change.
- If structure/config/dependency changes occurred, call out context-artifact updates as part of review.
- Return findings ordered by risk: correctness, release/doc drift, maintainability.
Output Contract
Return:
- blocking findings
- non-blocking improvements
- files/docs/tests that must be updated
- exact verification commands
Verification Commands
pnpm run build
pnpm run release-status
pnpm run typecheck
pnpm run lint
pnpm run test
Evidence Format
- finding severity
- affected file(s)
- why it matters in Agent Lint specifically
- recommended fix
- verification command(s)
Safety / DONTs
- Do not suggest
any,@ts-ignore, or band-aid casts. - Do not ignore docs consistency when public surface changes.
- Do not add MCP-side file writes or stateful behavior.
- Do not recommend skipping verification for package or client-facing changes.
Gotchas
- Public-surface changes often require README and docs-consistency test updates together.
- Context maintenance artifacts can drift after structural changes even when runtime code still works.
- A "small" change in
sharedorcorecan affect both published packages. - Repo-specific constraints matter more than generic review advice.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: samilozturk
- Source: samilozturk/agentlint
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@agent-lint/cli
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.