AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Brain Triage

skill-sandermoon-local-brain-brain-triage · by SanderMoon

Process inbox items systematically — refile to projects, add metadata, or discard. Use when the inbox has items, after a daily briefing reveals pending captures, or when the user says "process my inbox", "triage", or "clean up my dump".

No reviews yet
0 installs
14 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-sandermoon-local-brain-brain-triage

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Brain Triage? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

brain-triage: Inbox Processing

Systematically process items in the inbox (00_dump.md), helping the user decide where each item belongs. This is the "clarify and organize" phase of the GTD loop.

Trigger Phrases

  • "Process my inbox", "Triage my dump"
  • "Clean up my inbox", "Organize my captures"
  • "What's in my inbox?"
  • After a daily briefing shows inbox items

Workflow

Step 1 — Fetch Inbox and Context

Call get_dump_items to retrieve all inbox items.

If the inbox is empty: > "Inbox zero — nothing to process. Nice work."

If items exist, also call get_brain_overview to get the list of existing projects for refile suggestions.

Step 2 — Group and Present

Before processing item-by-item, scan all items and group related ones:

  • Items that mention the same project or topic
  • Items captured close together that form a sequence

Present a summary: > "You have [N] items in your inbox. I see [X] that look related to [project], [Y] that might be new topics. Let's process them."

Step 3 — Process Each Item (or Group)

For each item or group of related items:

  1. Show the item with its ID and content
  2. Suggest an action based on content analysis:
  • Refile to [project] — if it clearly matches an existing project
  • Create new project — if it represents a distinct new effort
  • Convert to note — if it's reference material, not an action
  • Add metadata — if it's a task but needs priority/due date
  • Discard — if it's stale, duplicate, or no longer relevant
  1. Wait for confirmation — never refile without the user agreeing

For batches of related items going to the same project, suggest a batch refile: > "These 4 items all look like they belong in [project]. Refile all of them?"

Step 4 — Execute Actions

Based on user decisions:

  • refile_item — for moves to existing projects (use batch array for multiple items)
  • create_project then refile_item — for new project creation
  • create_project_note — for converting items to notes
  • update_todo — for adding priority or due dates after refile
  • delete_todo — for discarding items (confirm first)

Step 5 — Summary

After processing all items: > "Done! Processed [N] items: [X] refiled, [Y] new projects created, [Z] discarded. Inbox is at [remaining] items."

If inbox is now empty, celebrate briefly.

Tool Sequence

get_dump_items()
get_brain_overview()
  → group and present
  → for each item/group:
    → suggest action
    → await confirmation
    → refile_item() / create_project() / create_project_note() / delete_todo()
  → present summary

Notes

  • Speed over perfection — if the user says "yeah, refile all of those", do it in one batch call
  • When suggesting a project for refile, explain why you think it matches ("this mentions the API, which relates to your backend-v2 project")
  • If an item is ambiguous, offer 2-3 options rather than guessing
  • Keep momentum — do not over-discuss each item. Quick decisions are the goal
  • If the inbox has > 15 items, offer to do a "quick pass" (obvious refiles first) vs. "thorough pass" (every item)
  • Tone: systematic and efficient — like processing email with a good filter

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.