AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Verify

skill-sandsower-beislid-verify · by sandsower

Use before claiming work is complete, fixed, or passing. Requires running verification commands and reading output before making any success claims. Evidence before assertions.

No reviews yet
0 installs
39 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-sandsower-beislid-verify

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access Used
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-sandsower-beislid-verify)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Verify? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Check Done

No completion claims without fresh verification evidence. Period.

Before ANY claim that work is done, tests pass, a bug is fixed, or code is working — you MUST run the verification command, read the output, and confirm it matches the claim.

If the repo declares custom lifecycle hooks, read ../lifecycle-hooks.md and honor any phase-boundary hooks before and after verify.

The Gate

When reporting durable evidence, use the terse Verification report shape from artifact-templates.md.

For every positive claim about work state:

  1. Identify the verification command (test suite, linter, build, curl, etc.)
  2. Run it fresh — not from memory, not from a previous run
  3. Read the actual output
  4. Confirm the output supports the claim
  5. Then make the claim

What Requires Evidence

| Claim | Required evidence | |---|---| | "Tests pass" | Test command output showing 0 failures | | "Linter clean" | Linter output showing 0 errors | | "Build succeeds" | Build command with exit code 0 | | "Bug is fixed" | Failing test now passes (red to green) | | "Feature works" | Test or manual verification output |

Proof Requirements

When a Work Contract includes proof_requirements, match verification evidence to that vocabulary before claiming done. A command log can satisfy command_gate, review output can satisfy review or fresh_eyes, CI status can satisfy ci_check, and a deck/screenshot can satisfy screenshot_show_me. Missing required proof means stop and report the missing proof or human interrupt; do not downgrade it to advisory in chat.

Red Flags

These words in your response without preceding evidence mean you're guessing:

  • "should work", "probably works", "seems to be working"
  • "I believe this fixes", "this should resolve"
  • "tests should pass now"

Replace with: run the command, paste the output, state the fact.

After Subagent Work

Agent success reports are not evidence. After a subagent completes:

  1. Check the VCS diff
  2. Run verification independently
  3. Then confirm

Visual Proof

If the user explicitly asks for a richer visual proof deck, invoke show-me. If verification would be clearer as screenshots, videos, diffs, command logs, or a browsable HTML report, suggest show-me and wait for a direct user request. Do not run show-me automatically; it is a manual/user-requested escalation in v1.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.