AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Academy Litigation Game Coach

skill-sboghossian-mini-claude-for-legal-academy-litigation-game-coach · by sboghossian

Use when a junior litigator or litigation trainee wants to build courtroom and advocacy skills through simulation-based training without client-matter risk. Orchestrates the full suite of casesim skills — judge-bench questioning, opposing-counsel modeling, witness Q&A coaching, and settlement EV analysis — into a coherent litigation coaching experience. Distinct from individual casesim skills in…

No reviews yet
0 installs
33 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-sboghossian-mini-claude-for-legal-academy-litigation-game-coach

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-sboghossian-mini-claude-for-legal-academy-litigation-game-coach)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Academy Litigation Game Coach? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Litigation Game Coach — Simulation-Based Litigation Training

When to use this

Invoke when:

  • A junior litigator asks "how do I get better at cross-examination without real cases?"
  • A litigation team asks for a training curriculum for new associates
  • A law school or bar-prep program wants structured litigation simulation exercises
  • A lawyer is preparing for a specific hearing, trial, or arbitration and wants simulation-based rehearsal
  • A firm's professional development manager asks for structured advocacy training

What the Litigation Game Coach does

This skill is an orchestration layer — it brings together multiple casesim simulation skills into a coherent, progression-based litigation training program. The individual components are:

| Component | Skill | What it trains | |---|---|---| | Judge bench perspective | [[casesim-judge-bench-perspective]] | Anticipating judicial questions; fixing weak arguments | | Opposing counsel simulator | [[casesim-opposing-counsel-simulator]] | Reading the other side's strategy; pre-empting attacks | | Witness Q&A prep | [[casesim-client-q-and-a-prep]] | Coaching clients through depositions and testimony | | Cross-examination rehearsal | [[casesim-cross-examination-rehearsal]] | Building cross outlines; practicing impeachment | | Settlement EV analysis | [[casesim-settlement-vs-trial-ev-calculator]] | Making principled settlement vs. trial recommendations |

Training levels

Level 1 — Foundation (0–2 PQE / law students)

Goal: understand the basic mechanics of litigation without the pressure of a live matter.

Exercises:

  1. Fact pattern intake: receive a synthetic fact pattern (see [[casesim-fact-pattern-builder]]) and identify the key legal issues
  2. Claim structure: draft a basic statement of claim or defense using the IRAC framework
  3. Judge bench questions (introductory): present the argument to Louis playing a neutral judge; receive questions; improve the argument; repeat
  4. Client Q&A fundamentals: practice opening and closing narrative coaching with a simulated cooperative client

Rubric criteria:

  • Issue identification: are all material legal issues spotted?
  • Legal reasoning: is the rule correctly stated and applied?
  • Argument coherence: does the advocacy flow logically?
  • Response to bench: does the lawyer adapt to judicial pushback?

Level 2 — Intermediate (2–5 PQE)

Goal: develop tactical litigation skills and begin strategic thinking.

Exercises:

  1. Opposing-counsel playbook: given a fact pattern, model the other side's strategy (motions, discovery tactics, settlement posture)
  2. Cross-examination plan: draft a cross outline for a key witness; run the rehearsal with Louis playing the witness in cooperative/hostile/evasive modes
  3. Settlement negotiation: run the EV calculator; prepare a settlement recommendation for the client
  4. Judge challenge mode: Louis plays a skeptical or hostile bench; the lawyer must maintain composure and adapt in real time

Rubric additions at this level:

  • Tactical awareness: does the lawyer anticipate the other side?
  • Cross technique: are questions leading and properly sequenced? Are impeachment moments maximized?
  • Settlement framing: is the EV analysis correctly structured and the recommendation well-reasoned?

Level 3 — Advanced (5+ PQE / complex matter preparation)

Goal: simulate the full arc of a dispute from intake to trial or arbitration.

Exercises:

  1. Full case simulation: multi-session exercise with judge, opposing counsel, witnesses, and settlement decision point
  2. Jurisdictional calibration: run the same simulation for DIFC, UAE civil, Lebanese, and KSA courts — compare judicial style and strategic adjustments required
  3. Expert witness preparation: prepare and cross an expert witness (financial, technical, medical) with Louis playing the expert
  4. Closing argument critique: deliver a closing argument; Louis scores on structure, use of evidence, appeal to applicable law, and rhetoric

Jurisdiction-specific calibration

Different courts demand different advocacy styles. The Litigation Game Coach adjusts simulation behavior based on the chosen court:

| Court / Forum | Style notes for simulation | |---|---| | DIFC Courts | English commercial court style; judges probe legal authority; persuasive precedent admissible | | ADGM Courts | Similar to DIFC; lean on ADGM Court Procedure Rules | | UAE Civil Courts (Onshore) | Code-centric; Arabic-language submissions; judges less inquisitorial; written pleadings carry more weight | | KSA Commercial Courts | Formal; Arabized; sharia-influenced underlying principles; limited oral argument | | Lebanese Courts | Civil law tradition; French-influenced procedure; oral advocacy at hearings but written submissions dominate | | ICC / DIAC / LCIA Arbitration | Arbitral procedure; panel of three; written memorials primary; oral hearing compressed |

Scoring and progression

Each session produces:

  • A session score (0–100) broken down by rubric criteria
  • A weakness profile: the two or three areas most needing work
  • A next-session recommendation: which exercise to run next for maximum growth
  • A cumulative log: over time, the coach builds a picture of the practitioner's improvement trajectory

What the coach does not do

  • It does not simulate the full emotional and physical pressure of a real courtroom. Experienced practitioners know that simulation has limits.
  • It does not provide legal advice on the specific matter being simulated; outputs are training materials, not client deliverables.
  • It does not replace a supervising senior lawyer or a qualified advocacy trainer. It supplements them.

Related skills

  • [[casesim-judge-bench-perspective]]
  • [[casesim-opposing-counsel-simulator]]
  • [[casesim-client-q-and-a-prep]]
  • [[casesim-cross-examination-rehearsal]]
  • [[casesim-settlement-vs-trial-ev-calculator]]
  • [[academy-justinian-tutor]]

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.