Git Conventions

Git Conventions

Invocation Boundary

git commit, git push, and gh pr create are invoked only when the human explicitly types /commit-push-pr or /sync (or one of their listed Trigger Phrases). The slash commands themselves are not invoked autonomously — wait for the human trigger. The Version bump: AskUserQuestion in /commit-push-pr is non-skippable; refuse to proceed without an explicit human selection.

See CLAUDE.md Critical Rule 13.

Branch Naming

Pattern: {type}/{short-description}

Types:

• feature/ — New functionality
• fix/ — Bug fixes
• refactor/ — Code restructuring without behavior change
• docs/ — Documentation only
• test/ — Test additions or fixes
• chore/ — Tooling, dependencies, config

Examples:

• feature/auth-flow
• fix/login-timeout
• refactor/extract-merger-module

Keep branch names under 50 characters. Use hyphens, not underscores.

Commit Messages

Follow conventional commits format:

type(scope): short description

Longer explanation if needed. Focus on WHY, not WHAT.
The diff already shows what changed.

Closes #123

Types: feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore, perf, ci

Scope is optional but helpful: feat(auth): add OAuth2 token refresh

Rules:

• Subject line under 72 characters
• Imperative mood ("add" not "added" or "adds")
• No period at the end of the subject line
• Blank line between subject and body
• Body explains motivation, not mechanics
• Never append Co-Authored-By trailers, AI attribution lines, or "Generated with" footers

When to Commit

Commit after each logical unit of work:

• A function is complete and tested
• A refactor is done and tests pass
• A bug is fixed and verified

Don't batch unrelated changes into one commit. Don't commit broken code.

Branching Strategy

feature-branch ──PR──▶ develop ──PR──▶ main (release)

• develop — active development. Contributors fork, branch from develop, and PR back to develop.
• main — production releases. Maintainer-only, merged from develop.
• gh-pages — auto-deployed docs. Maintainer-only.

All feature/bugfix branches are created from and merged back into develop. Never PR directly to main.

PR Workflow

1. Push your branch
2. Create PR with gh pr create --base develop (feature/bugfix branches target develop)
3. When on develop, PR targets main: gh pr create --base main (release merges only)
4. PR title follows same format as commit subject: type(scope): description
5. PR body includes: what changed, why, how to test, anything reviewers should know
6. Request review if the project has reviewers configured
7. Do not add AI-generated footers (e.g., "Generated with Claude Code") to PR descriptions

Squash vs Merge

• Squash when: the branch has many small "wip" commits that don't individually matter
• Merge when: each commit in the branch is a meaningful, atomic change
• Rebase when: you need a linear history and commits are clean

Default preference: squash merge for feature branches, regular merge for release branches.

Worktree Conventions

When using git worktree for parallel work:

• Worktrees go in a sibling directory, not inside the repo
• Naming: {repo}-{branch-name} for the worktree directory
• Always clean up worktrees when done: git worktree remove {path}
• Don't leave stale worktrees — they hold refs and can cause confusion

Agents that use worktree isolation (code-simplifier, test-writer, bug-fixer, etc.) create and clean up their own worktrees automatically.

Shared-State Files

These files are modified ONLY on the develop branch (via /sync), never on feature branches:

• docs/spec/PROGRESS.md — project progress tracker
• docs/spec/SPEC.md — feature specification
• README.md — project documentation
• package.json version field — release versioning

This prevents merge conflicts when running parallel feature branches.

Versioning Policy

Follow semver when the project publishes releases:

| What changed | Bump | Example | |---|---|---| | Bug fix, patch to existing behavior | patch | Fixed edge case in date parser | | New feature, command, or API surface | minor | Added CSV export option | | Breaking change to public API or CLI | major | Renamed config key, removed flag | | Only docs, CI, tests, internal refactor | no bump | Updated README, added test |

Publish from the primary branch (usually main), not from feature or development branches. What is published must always match what is on the release branch.

When to bump: Include the version change in the same PR as the work — no separate "bump version" commits after the fact.

How to publish:

1. Merge the release PR into main
2. Pull locally: git checkout main && git pull
3. Publish using your ecosystem's tool (npm publish, cargo publish, twine upload, etc.)
4. Sync develop: git checkout develop && git merge main && git push origin develop

Rule of thumb: If the change affects what users see, install, or depend on, it needs a version bump. If it only affects the project's internal development workflow, it does not.

Per-PR bump declarations

Every PR targeting develop declares its intended version bump in the PR description:

Version bump: {major|minor|patch|none}

• major — breaking change to public API, CLI, or scaffold contract
• minor — new feature, command, agent, or flag
• patch — bug fix or user-visible behavior change with no new surface
• none — docs, CI, tests, internal refactor (nothing consumers notice)

/sync aggregates declarations from all PRs merged since the last version tag and picks the highest: major > minor > patch > none. If all merged PRs are none, no release is cut — /sync updates shared-state files but does not bump the version or open a PR to main.

This is how release batching works: internal-only work accumulates on develop without triggering publishes, and multiple user-facing PRs group into a single well-documented release.

Edge cases

• Release PRs (develop → main): /sync excludes these from scanning.

They ARE the release, not an input to one. Known limitation: any develop→main PR is excluded regardless of content. Safe in practice because that direction is only used for releases.

• Revert PRs: Declare the same bump level as the PR being reverted.

Reverting a patch is itself a patch. A patch + matching revert in the same release group produces a net-zero user-visible change but still bumps the version — something shipped internally and was un-shipped, which is part of the release's history. Do not cancel them out.

• Missing declarations: Treated as none with a warning that

propagates to the release PR body and CHANGELOG entry. Do not manually backfill old PR bodies — let them flow through as none so under-documentation is visible rather than silent.

• No tags yet (first release): /sync prompts to create a starting

tag (default v0.1.0, customizable, cancelable). The tool does NOT silently invent a tag.

• Hotfix merged directly to main: Bypasses /sync entirely. Requires

manual version management. Known limitation; out of scope.

Optional: GitHub labels (release:major, release:minor, etc.) can replace body-text declarations for maintainers who prefer them. Deferred to a future phase; not scaffolded by default.

Gotchas

• Never force-push to main/master. Force-push to feature branches only when you

own the branch and have communicated with collaborators.

• If a rebase goes wrong, git reflog is your friend. The old state is still there.
• Don't commit generated files (build output, node_modules, .pyc) — check .gitignore.
• When working in worktrees, remember that stashes are shared across the repo.

A stash in one worktree is visible in another.

• Commit messages are documentation. Future you will read them. Write for that person.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: sefaertunc
• Source: sefaertunc/Worclaude
• License: MIT
• Homepage: https://sefaertunc.github.io/Worclaude/

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.