AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Onsite Audit

skill-shalintripathi-organic-os-onsite-audit · by shalintripathi

Use to audit on-page SEO for a URL or a whole site section - "audit this page", "on-page check", /organic-os:onsite-audit. Read-only; needs no credentials for public checks.

No reviews yet
0 installs
1 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-shalintripathi-organic-os-onsite-audit

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Onsite Audit? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

On-page audit (read-only)

  1. Read profile if a brain repo exists (optional - this skill also works bare).
  2. Public checks per URL (WebFetch): title (length, keyword presence),

meta description (present, and flagged when over ~155 chars - Google truncates around there), H1 count, heading structure, canonical, robots meta, image alts, internal links out, JSON-LD present/valid, answer-capsule presence in the first 200 words, server-rendered content check.

  1. Page essentials dimension - runs for each audited page, and site-wide

where a check says so. Every check emits the standard falsifiable signal line (observation | why it matters | "we are wrong if..." | leading indicator) and, where a fix is actionable, feeds onsite-propose. Evidence discipline throughout (see plugin/docs/evidence.md): state what was measured versus what was inferred, and never promise a third-party outcome (rankings, citations) as the result of a fix.

  1. Author entity (E-E-A-T): the author has a visible on-page bio,

sameAs links, and - for AI-attributed content - a named human reviewer note on the page; the author schema node carries description + sameAs. A thin entity -> P2 signal + a gated proposal. The remediation is site-level: the CMS adapter can write the author profile description where capabilities()['author_profile_fields'] is true (the WordPress adapter's update_user writes it over REST), plus the schema settings; any step beyond the adapter's capabilities() ends partially-applied per skills/onsite-apply, with the human step named.

  1. Answer capsule: a 40-60 word standalone answer sits above the

first H2. Missing -> P2 signal + a content-refresh proposal.

  1. In-content images: zero images in a 500+ word explainer -> P3

signal referencing the image-brief path (skills/ce-image writes -image-brief.md). Image findings - this gap and step 2's missing alts - now feed image-fix proposals (the image-fix action type in skills/onsite-propose, executed gated by skills/onsite-apply).

  1. Meta description length: lives in step 2's meta checks (extended

there with the ~155-char flag) - listed here for completeness, never duplicated as a second check.

  1. Social image shape: og:image is square while twitter:card is

summarylargeimage -> P3 signal + proposal (site-level asset); if no landscape asset exists, route via the image-brief fallback above.

  1. Publisher schema shape: the publisher node missing logo/url,

or mixing Person and Organization types -> P3 signal for the entity-schema lane (entity-schema-engineer).

  1. Sitemap membership (site-wide): any published post older than 1

hour absent from the sitemap -> P2 signal ("likely regeneration lag or cache; if the SEO plugin's cache purge needs admin, this ends partially-applied").

  1. Link health and internal-link graph dimension - site-wide, one capped

crawl per run. Own-site rule, stated because it matters: this crawl touches ONLY the profile's own site. ADR-0006's no-scraping decision bans scraping third parties; your own property is yours to crawl, and onsite.linkgraph.crawl enforces it - it never follows an off-host link. Run crawl(base_url, stdlib_fetch, max_pages=100, seed_urls=) (seeding with the sitemap is what lets a page nothing links to enter the graph at all; no sitemap means orphan detection is skipped and noted, never guessed), then analyze(graph). Checks, each in the standard falsifiable signal form:

  1. Broken internal links (analyze()['broken']): a linked target

answering 4xx or unreachable -> P2 signal naming the source page, the target, and the status. From the clearest case, ONE gated fix proposal per run via onsite-propose: rewrite the source link to the correct target, or a redirect where the target moved (the redirect action type in skills/onsite-apply). Links resolving through a 3xx hop (redirect_chains) ride along as evidence in the same signal lane; rewriting the link to the final target is the usual fix.

  1. Orphan pages (analyze()['orphans']): in the sitemap seed but

zero inbound internal links -> P3 signal recommending internal links from the top hubs (analyze()['hubs'] names them). Where an orphan also sits on the latest weekly striking-distance list (skills/hoo-weekly), note the linkage in the signal - the two findings share one fix.

  1. Shallow striking-distance pages: fewer than 2 inbound links AND on

the latest weekly striking-distance list -> P2 signal. This is the highest-leverage internal-link play: the query already sits at position 4-15 and links from the hubs are the one lever fully in our hands. Falsifiability line, verbatim in the signal: "we are wrong if 2+ new hub links do not move the query's position within 28 days."

  1. If CMS credentials exist: pull the post via the CMS adapter (WordPress

today) with get_post + get_rendered_head for the rendered truth; list the SEO meta field values (RankMath fields on WordPress).

  1. Launch technical-seo-auditor for site-level context when auditing > 3 URLs.
  2. Output: per-URL scorecard table + prioritized issue list. File signals for

P0/P1 issues, plus the page-essentials signals from step 3 and the link-health signals from step 4, if a brain repo exists. Propose nothing here; that is onsite-propose's job (the one broken-link fix in step 4 included - the audit only names it).

At each stage boundary, append a one-line progress marker with a UTC timestamp to the run report file before starting the stage - headless runs are watched by tailing that file, not a terminal.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.