Install
$ agentstack add skill-sharpdeveye-maestro-temper ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
MANDATORY PREPARATION
Invoke /agent-workflow — it contains workflow principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no workflow context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-maestro first. Consult the agent-architecture reference in the agent-workflow skill for topology patterns and when multi-agent is justified.
Pull back from over-engineering. The most common mistake isn't building too little — it's building too much.
Over-Engineering Detection
Signs you've over-engineered:
- Multi-agent for a single-agent problem
- Premature optimization before you have performance data
- Abstraction layers with one implementation
- Configuration for things that never change
- Evaluation loops on non-critical outputs
- Framework before features
The Complexity Test
For each component:
- Is this solving a problem we actually have? (not "might have")
- Is this the simplest solution that works?
- Would removing this break anything? (if not, remove it)
- Can someone new understand this in 5 minutes? (if not, simplify)
Tempering Strategies
Collapse Unnecessary Agents
OVER-ENGINEERED: User → Classifier → Router → Specialist → Formatter → Checker (6 components)
TEMPERED: User → Single Agent with good prompt (1 component, same quality)
Remove Premature Abstraction
OVER-ENGINEERED: class AgentOrchestrator with 5 strategy interfaces
TEMPERED: async function runWorkflow(input) — direct, readable
Simplify Configuration
OVER-ENGINEERED: config.yaml (200 lines, 47 params, 3 inheritance levels)
TEMPERED: config.yaml (20 lines, essential params only, sensible defaults)
What NOT to Temper
- Error handling — essential, not overhead
- Logging — saves you when things go wrong
- Input validation — prevents cascading failures
- Core guardrails — safety is non-negotiable
- The golden test set — how you know it still works
Recommended Next Step
After tempering, run /evaluate to confirm quality is preserved, or /diagnose for a full health check.
NEVER:
- Temper without measuring output quality before and after
- Remove error handling in the name of simplicity
- Simplify below the level of correctness
- Remove features users actively rely on
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: sharpdeveye
- Source: sharpdeveye/maestro
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://maestroskills.dev
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.