— No reviews yet
0 installs
8 views
0.0% view→install
Install
$ agentstack add skill-shieldnet-360-secure-vibe-api-security ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ● Network access Used
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Are you the author of Api Security? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claimAbout
API Security
Apply OWASP API Top 10 patterns to authentication, authorization, and input validation
ALWAYS
- Require authentication on every non-public endpoint. Default to authenticated; opt out for genuinely public routes by explicit annotation.
- Apply authorization at the object level — confirm the authenticated subject actually has access to the requested resource ID, not just that they're logged in (defeats the OWASP API1 BOLA / IDOR class).
- Bind object-level authz to the gateway-authenticated principal, never to an actor id echoed in the request: a check that a request-supplied
senderId/ownerId/actedByis a valid member validates the claimed actor, not the caller (looks like authz, isn't). - On
/{scopeId}/.../{subjectId}routes, authorize the relationship — confirm the subject belongs to that scope; a caller-vs-scope check alone does not authorize the subject (multi-key BOLA). - Authorize each subject on streaming responses (SSE/chunked/WebSocket): the
200is committed before the handler runs, so an empty/filtered stream — not a4xx— is the deny signal; an unauthorized subject gets zero events. - Validate all request inputs against an explicit schema (JSON Schema, Pydantic, Zod, validator/v10 struct tags). Reject early; never propagate untrusted input deeper.
- Enforce rate limits at the route level for authentication endpoints, password reset, and any expensive operation.
- Use short-lived access tokens (≤ 1 hour) with refresh tokens, not long-lived bearer tokens.
- Return generic error messages externally (
invalid credentials) and log specifics internally — avoid leaking which of username/password was wrong. - Include
Cache-Control: no-storeon responses containing personal or sensitive data.
NEVER
- Use sequential integer IDs in URLs for resources accessible across tenants. Use UUIDs or unguessable opaque IDs.
- Trust
Authorizationheaders without verifying the signature and expiration. - Accept
nonealgorithm JWTs. Pin the expected algorithm at verification time. - Mass-assign request bodies directly to ORM models (
User(**request.json)) — this enables privilege escalation when the model has admin fields the user shouldn't control. - Act on a subject/owner id asserted by an upstream producer (queue/topic/webhook) without authenticating the channel and re-validating the asserted subject — a spoofed producer otherwise drives forged cross-tenant effects.
- Key a rate-limit / lockout counter on a client-controllable header (leftmost
X-Forwarded-For,X-Real-IP,Forwarded) — rotating it yields a fresh bucket per request and defeats the limit. Derive the client IP from the trusted-proxy hop count (or key on the authenticated user), and fail closed on limiter error. - Disable CSRF protection on state-changing endpoints used by browsers.
- Return stack traces or framework error pages to the client in production.
- Use
HTTP GETfor any state-changing operation — GET should be safe and idempotent. - Rely on network position (IP allowlist, VPN, private subnet, "internal only", a WAF/edge rule) as the only control on a sensitive endpoint. Reachability is not authentication: the moment there's an SSRF, a compromised internal host, a tenant on the network, or a boundary change, an unauthenticated "internal" endpoint (
permission_classes = [AllowAny], noRequireAuth) is wide open. Enforce auth/authz at the service itself, behind any network control. - Place security controls (auth, field-stripping, CSRF, rate-limit, input validation) only at a gateway / BFF / proxy while the backend service is also directly reachable. An attacker calls the service directly and bypasses every proxy-layer control — controls must live at the service that owns the data. (A common variant: the gateway checks that a JWT is present but the service never checks the caller's role or object-level ownership — the service reads the subject id from the body/path/query and trusts it.)
- Gate a write / create endpoint on authentication only when the created resource is rendered to all users or tenants (a global gallery, shared catalog, public template list). Authentication is not authorization: enforce a function-level role / privilege check on any write that publishes into a shared or global namespace (OWASP API5 — Broken Function Level Authorization). A low-privilege user posting into a globally-visible store is a delivery vector for stored-XSS / malicious-link chains.
KNOWN FALSE POSITIVES
- Public marketing-site endpoints serving anonymous traffic legitimately have no auth and no rate limits beyond the load balancer.
- Sequential IDs in paths are fine for genuinely public, non-tenant-scoped resources (e.g. blog post slugs, public product catalog items).
- Health-check endpoints (
/healthz,/ready) intentionally bypass auth. - A network control (mTLS service mesh, NetworkPolicy, private ingress) is fine as defense-in-depth — the anti-pattern is only when it's the sole control and the service itself authenticates nothing.
- Mutual-TLS / SPIFFE workload identity between services is authentication (a cryptographic caller identity), not mere network position — mTLS-authenticated service-to-service calls are fine even on a private network.
- A write into the caller's own private / tenant-scoped namespace needs only authentication + object-level ownership — function-level role gating applies specifically to writes whose result becomes visible beyond the creator.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: ShieldNet-360
- Source: ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.