Install
$ agentstack add skill-shikaijieskj-science-skills-science-cover-letter ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Science Cover Letter
Use this skill to make the editor-facing pitch precise, broad, and evidence-grounded.
Default stance
- Do not oversell beyond the manuscript evidence.
- Do not claim priority, novelty, or field transformation unless supplied and defensible.
- Keep the letter short and editor-readable.
- Emphasize why the work matters to a broad Science-family audience.
- Verify current journal requirements for cover letters, suggested reviewers, competing interests,
related manuscripts, and presubmission inquiries.
Open extra files
| File | Open when | |---|---| | [references/letter-structure.md](references/letter-structure.md) | Need cover-letter or presubmission structure | | [references/scope-fit-check.md](references/scope-fit-check.md) | Need broad-interest, novelty, and journal-fit audit |
Intake
Ask for:
- target journal
- title and article type
- one-sentence advance
- strongest evidence
- why the result matters beyond the subfield
- competing interest / related manuscript / prior submission facts if relevant
- suggested or opposed reviewers if required
Workflow
- Build a scope-fit statement before drafting.
- Map the pitch:
problem -> gap -> advance -> evidence -> broad significance -> fit.
- Draft concise letter.
- Audit for unsupported novelty and inflated language.
- Add placeholders for required administrative declarations.
Output format
Scope-fit diagnosis
- [fit strengths]
- [risks]
Draft letter
[letter]
Required facts to verify
- [journal-specific declarations, reviewers, conflicts, related manuscripts]
For Chinese source notes, draft submission-facing English first, then Chinese notes on tone and missing inputs.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: shikaijieskj
- Source: shikaijieskj/science-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.