Install
$ agentstack add skill-shikaijieskj-science-skills-science-figure ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Science Figure
Use this skill before plotting or rewriting legends. A Science-family figure is an evidence argument, not a decorative arrangement.
First move: figure contract
Before editing or making a figure, define:
- core conclusion
- target audience
- panel list and each panel's question
- evidence hierarchy
- source data for each quantitative claim
- likely reviewer risk
- journal and article type, if known
If the user has not supplied data, create a panel plan and legend scaffold rather than fabricating plots.
Open extra files
| File | Open when | |---|---| | [references/figure-contract.md](references/figure-contract.md) | Need to convert results into panel map, evidence hierarchy, or reviewer-risk checks | | [references/legend-and-panel-style.md](references/legend-and-panel-style.md) | Need legend structure, panel titles, typography, color, or abbreviation rules | | [references/qa-checklist.md](references/qa-checklist.md) | Before final delivery or when auditing an existing figure |
Figure workflow
- State the figure's one-sentence conclusion.
- Assign one job per panel:
context, design, validation, main result, mechanism, comparison, generalization, or limitation.
- Order panels by reader logic, not by experiment chronology.
- Remove redundant panels unless they test different risks.
- Map every claim in the legend to a panel, method, statistic, or source-data file.
- Audit visual encoding:
- color means the same thing across panels
- axes and units are explicit
- error bars and sample sizes are defined
- statistical tests are specified where needed
- image panels have scale bars and acquisition context
- Return the figure plan, legend, and unresolved data/source issues.
Science-family design defaults
- Favor dense but legible multi-panel evidence.
- Put the strongest result in the visual position the reader sees early.
- Use muted neutral structure plus a small number of meaningful accent colors.
- Avoid rainbow palettes unless the data are continuous and colorbar-labeled.
- Never use color alone to encode categorical distinctions.
- Legends should explain what was done and what is shown, not claim more than the data support.
Output format
Figure conclusion
[one sentence]
Panel map
| Panel | Job | Evidence | Key visual | Reviewer risk |
Legend draft
[legend]
Source-data / methods checks
- [needed files, statistics, scale bars, n, replicates, software, or "None"]
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: shikaijieskj
- Source: shikaijieskj/science-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.