AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Science Figure

skill-shikaijieskj-science-skills-science-figure · by shikaijieskj

Plan, design, audit, or revise Science/AAAS-family scientific figures, multi-panel layouts, figure legends, graphical result stories, source-data mapping, and publication-ready visual outputs. Use when the user asks for a Science-style figure, figure plan, panel order, legend rewrite, graphical abstract-like evidence layout, microscopy/omics/robotics/clinical/materials figure audit, or journal-re…

No reviews yet
0 installs
11 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-shikaijieskj-science-skills-science-figure

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-shikaijieskj-science-skills-science-figure)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Science Figure? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Science Figure

Use this skill before plotting or rewriting legends. A Science-family figure is an evidence argument, not a decorative arrangement.

First move: figure contract

Before editing or making a figure, define:

  • core conclusion
  • target audience
  • panel list and each panel's question
  • evidence hierarchy
  • source data for each quantitative claim
  • likely reviewer risk
  • journal and article type, if known

If the user has not supplied data, create a panel plan and legend scaffold rather than fabricating plots.

Open extra files

| File | Open when | |---|---| | [references/figure-contract.md](references/figure-contract.md) | Need to convert results into panel map, evidence hierarchy, or reviewer-risk checks | | [references/legend-and-panel-style.md](references/legend-and-panel-style.md) | Need legend structure, panel titles, typography, color, or abbreviation rules | | [references/qa-checklist.md](references/qa-checklist.md) | Before final delivery or when auditing an existing figure |

Figure workflow

  1. State the figure's one-sentence conclusion.
  2. Assign one job per panel:

context, design, validation, main result, mechanism, comparison, generalization, or limitation.

  1. Order panels by reader logic, not by experiment chronology.
  2. Remove redundant panels unless they test different risks.
  3. Map every claim in the legend to a panel, method, statistic, or source-data file.
  4. Audit visual encoding:
  • color means the same thing across panels
  • axes and units are explicit
  • error bars and sample sizes are defined
  • statistical tests are specified where needed
  • image panels have scale bars and acquisition context
  1. Return the figure plan, legend, and unresolved data/source issues.

Science-family design defaults

  • Favor dense but legible multi-panel evidence.
  • Put the strongest result in the visual position the reader sees early.
  • Use muted neutral structure plus a small number of meaningful accent colors.
  • Avoid rainbow palettes unless the data are continuous and colorbar-labeled.
  • Never use color alone to encode categorical distinctions.
  • Legends should explain what was done and what is shown, not claim more than the data support.

Output format

Figure conclusion
[one sentence]

Panel map
| Panel | Job | Evidence | Key visual | Reviewer risk |

Legend draft
[legend]

Source-data / methods checks
- [needed files, statistics, scale bars, n, replicates, software, or "None"]

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.