Install
$ agentstack add skill-shitianfang-jev-use-jev-use ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Handing off to Jev
Jev answers a typed judgment in ~250 ms at a judgment-model rate ($0.042/Mtok in, $0 out) instead of LLM reasoning. It is a RATE win, not a token win: Jev spends more tokens per decision, not fewer. So the saving is real only when the decision leaves the conversation — which is what the routing below is for. You stay the planner and the writer.
Route each decision: where are the facts × does it block?
| Where the facts are | Nothing is blocked — you can keep working | Blocked — nothing proceeds until this is decided | | --- | --- | --- | | Already in your context | jev_judge, every question about that state batched into ONE call (noul yes/no, choice next action, score quality) | jev_gate on that one action before you run it — and if it is every tool call, wire jev-use hook gate as a PreToolUse hook once and the decision leaves the conversation for good: 24 gated commands, 17.1 s, zero LLM tokens, vs 46.9 s / $0.2366 through a supervisor LLM | | Sitting in a file or tool output | a script pipes the file to jev-use judge — the items never enter your context | same CLI, from the script, then act on the verdicts it prints | | To be written by you (new text, code, options you cannot enumerate) | yours | yours |
Rules that make it pay off
- Route bulk data by reference. When the items sit in a file or in tool
output, have a script pipe them to jev-use judge — data pasted into a jev_judge call travels through your context twice, as tool input and as the verdict block back. Or route only the handful you genuinely cannot settle yourself.
- Batch. Measured: 12 questions about one state in ONE call took 224 ms;
the same 12 one at a time took 2,662 ms. Never one call per item.
- State is everything Jev sees. Put the relevant facts (tool output, file
excerpts, task intent) into state; Jev has no other context.
- Honor escalations. A verdict with
escalate: truehands that question
back to you: writing/open_ended mean it was structurally yours; oversized means the state was too big to judge; unsure means Jev's answer is only a prior (it's still in answer — use it as a hint); unreachable means proceed as if Jev didn't exist.
- Don't route trivia. If you already know the answer, just act; a Jev
call you didn't need is still a call.
Numbers, lanes, variance and caveats: bench/RESULTS.md.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: shitianfang
- Source: shitianfang/jev-use
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://www.npmjs.com/package/jev-use
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.