AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Code Review

skill-siviter-xyz-dot-agent-code-review · by siviter-xyz

Code review practices emphasizing technical rigor, evidence-based claims, and verification. Use when receiving code review feedback, completing tasks requiring review, or before making completion claims.

↗ Repository
— No reviews yet
0 installs
11 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-siviter-xyz-dot-agent-code-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-siviter-xyz-dot-agent-code-review)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
○ 4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Code Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Code Review

Guide proper code review practices emphasizing technical rigor, evidence-based claims, and verification over performative responses.

Overview

Code review requires three distinct practices:

  1. Receiving feedback - Technical evaluation over performative agreement
  2. Requesting reviews - Systematic review processes
  3. Verification gates - Evidence before any completion claims

Core Principle

Technical correctness over social comfort. Verify before implementing. Ask before assuming. Evidence before claims.

When to Use

Receiving Feedback

  • Receiving code review comments from any source
  • Feedback seems unclear or technically questionable
  • Multiple review items need prioritization
  • External reviewer lacks full context
  • Suggestion conflicts with existing decisions

Requesting Review

  • Completing tasks in subagent-driven development (after EACH task)
  • Finishing major features or refactors
  • Before merging to main branch
  • Stuck and need fresh perspective
  • After fixing complex bugs

Verification Gates

  • About to claim tests pass, build succeeds, or work is complete
  • Before committing, pushing, or creating PRs
  • Moving to next task
  • Any statement suggesting success/completion

Quick Decision Tree

SITUATION?
│
├─ Received feedback
│  ├─ Unclear items? → STOP, ask for clarification first
│  ├─ From human partner? → Understand, then implement
│  └─ From external reviewer? → Verify technically before implementing
│
├─ Completed work
│  ├─ Major feature/task? → Request systematic review
│  └─ Before merge? → Request systematic review
│
└─ About to claim status
   ├─ Have fresh verification? → State claim WITH evidence
   └─ No fresh verification? → RUN verification command first

CI Verification

Before any completion claim or commit:

  • Run CI checks (types, tests, lint)
  • Prefer single CI command if available
  • Verify all checks pass
  • Do not proceed if checks fail

References

For detailed protocols, see:

  • references/receiving-feedback.md - How to handle code review feedback
  • references/requesting-review.md - Systematic review processes
  • references/verification-gates.md - Evidence before claims protocol

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Write a review

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.

More in Agent Skills