AgentStack
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Orchestrate

skill-skillberry-ai-cap-evolve-orchestrate · by skillberry-ai

Drive the entire cap-evolve pipeline end to end, autonomously. Use when the user wants the whole optimization run with minimal hand-holding. Sequences intake → implement-and-check → baseline → the chosen algorithm loop → finalize → report, enforces the cap-evolve-check hard gate before spending budget, decides when to stop (budget/stall), and surfaces the honest test number at the end. Reads cape…

No reviews yet
0 installs
16 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-skillberry-ai-cap-evolve-orchestrate

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Orchestrate? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

orchestrate — the whole pipeline, end to end

orchestrate is the autonomous driver: it runs every phase in order and enforces the guardrails so a full optimization run needs little supervision. It does not add new logic — it sequences the phase skills and refuses to let the run skip a safety check. Its value is that the honesty discipline (ask-if-missing, hard gate, val-only acceptance, sealed test) is applied automatically rather than relying on the operator to remember each one.

Inputs / outputs (manifest tokens)

  • needs: project — resolved from capevolve.yaml (which capability / optimizer /

algorithm / budget).

  • provides: report — the end-to-end result: baseline → best val → sealed

test, with the winner named.

The sequence (and the guardrail at each step)

  1. intake — collect inputs, scaffold the project, **ask for any missing NEEDED

input** (never fabricate one).

  1. implement-and-check — implement the adapter; cap-evolve check must be green

(HARD GATE — do not advance until {"ok": true}).

  1. baseline — freeze the split (once, seeded), score the seed on val, check

headroom (stop early if the seed already saturates val).

  1. \ — run the loop named in capevolve.yaml (default all-at-once):

propose → evaluate(val) → diagnose → gate → accept/reject, until budget/stall. Acceptance is always on val, by significance (Δ > k·SE).

  1. finalize — score the best candidate on the sealed test split, once.
  2. report — baseline vs test; name the winner; surface pass^k and uncertainty.

The wiring is validated structurally: each step's needs must be satisfied by an upstream provides in the manifest, so a misordered or incompatible pipeline is caught before it runs.

How to run

python scripts/run.py --spec .capevolve/project/capevolve.yaml            # print the plan
python scripts/run.py --spec .capevolve/project/capevolve.yaml --execute  # run it (cap-evolve run)

Without --execute it prints the ordered plan (sequence, components, gate mode, budget) for inspection — run this first to confirm the pipeline before spending anything. Or, host-agnostic, follow RUN.md step by step; or cap-evolve run --spec.

Stopping rules

Stop when any holds:

  • budget exhaustedmax_iterations, max_metric_calls, or max_usd hit.
  • stall — N consecutive rejects (the search has plateaued; more tries just

burn budget chasing noise the gate will keep rejecting).

  • no headroom — the baseline already saturates val.

Whatever the stop reason, always finish with finalize + report so the honest, sealed-test number is recorded. An optimization run with no finalize has no result.

What good vs bad looks like

  • Good: the plan inspected before --execute; every guardrail enforced

automatically; the run ends with a sealed-test number and a named winner, even when the answer is "no significant gain".

  • Bad: advancing past a red cap-evolve check; gating on train; finalizing more

than one candidate; declaring success on val without ever scoring test.

References

  • references/concepts.md — the phase sequence as a needs/provides DAG, where

each honesty guardrail lives, and the stop rules, with sources.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.