AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Cost Benefit

skill-skyf0xx-better-thinking-cost-benefit · by skyf0xx

>

— No reviews yet
0 installs
38 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-skyf0xx-better-thinking-cost-benefit

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-skyf0xx-better-thinking-cost-benefit)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● 2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Cost Benefit? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Cost-Benefit

Tally the full costs and benefits of an action — including opportunity cost, hidden costs, and to-whom-they-accrue — before judging it worthwhile.

Why

Untrained tallies count visible, near-term, own-side effects and systematically miss opportunity cost, ongoing maintenance burden, and externalities — which flatters taking action over not taking it, every time.

Use when / Don't use when

  • Use when: justifying or challenging any investment of money, time, or attention.
  • Don't use when: stakes are genuinely trivial, or the decision is so dominated by a single factor that a full ledger adds nothing.

Inputs → Outputs

  • Inputs: a proposed action.
  • Outputs: a ledger of costs and benefits with timing, bearer, and confidence per entry, plus a net judgment flagging the dominant uncertainties.

Principles

  • The opportunity cost — the best foregone alternative — is a real cost, and it's almost always missing from the first draft of any ledger.
  • Count ongoing costs (maintenance, attention, added complexity), not just the upfront acquisition cost.
  • Note who bears each cost specifically — a net-positive action can still be a transfer of cost onto someone who was never consulted.
  • Sunk costs are not costs, and shouldn't appear in the ledger at all.

Procedure

  1. State the action and the actual comparison baseline — usually the best alternative use of the same resources, not simply "do nothing."
  2. List benefits with their timing and confidence.
  3. List costs: direct, ongoing, attention/complexity, and risk-bearing.
  4. Add the opportunity cost explicitly as its own line item.
  5. Mark who bears each entry, and flag any asymmetries — benefits accruing to one party, costs to another.
  6. Net it out, and state which one or two uncertain entries actually dominate the conclusion — that's the residual uncertainty worth resolving further.

Common mistakes

  • Using "do nothing" as the baseline when a live, better alternative actually exists.
  • Ignoring the long tail of maintenance costs that follow an initial investment.
  • Counting sunk costs as if they belonged in the ledger.
  • Treating hard-to-quantify entries as if they were zero, rather than estimating them explicitly.

Examples

  • Whether to build an internal tool versus buying or doing without.
  • Whether a recurring meeting series earns back its collective hours across attendees.
  • Whether a regulation's compliance burden is proportionate to the protection it provides; whether to adopt a new dependency.

Related

  • [[expected-value]] — the probabilistic version, used when entries are genuinely uncertain rather than point estimates.
  • [[second-order-scan]] — often surfaces the hidden entries this ledger would otherwise miss.
  • [[prioritization-triage]] — the natural next step once several cost-benefit ledgers need to be compared against each other.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.