Install
$ agentstack add skill-skyf0xx-better-thinking-cost-benefit ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Cost-Benefit
Tally the full costs and benefits of an action — including opportunity cost, hidden costs, and to-whom-they-accrue — before judging it worthwhile.
Why
Untrained tallies count visible, near-term, own-side effects and systematically miss opportunity cost, ongoing maintenance burden, and externalities — which flatters taking action over not taking it, every time.
Use when / Don't use when
- Use when: justifying or challenging any investment of money, time, or attention.
- Don't use when: stakes are genuinely trivial, or the decision is so dominated by a single factor that a full ledger adds nothing.
Inputs → Outputs
- Inputs: a proposed action.
- Outputs: a ledger of costs and benefits with timing, bearer, and confidence per entry, plus a net judgment flagging the dominant uncertainties.
Principles
- The opportunity cost — the best foregone alternative — is a real cost, and it's almost always missing from the first draft of any ledger.
- Count ongoing costs (maintenance, attention, added complexity), not just the upfront acquisition cost.
- Note who bears each cost specifically — a net-positive action can still be a transfer of cost onto someone who was never consulted.
- Sunk costs are not costs, and shouldn't appear in the ledger at all.
Procedure
- State the action and the actual comparison baseline — usually the best alternative use of the same resources, not simply "do nothing."
- List benefits with their timing and confidence.
- List costs: direct, ongoing, attention/complexity, and risk-bearing.
- Add the opportunity cost explicitly as its own line item.
- Mark who bears each entry, and flag any asymmetries — benefits accruing to one party, costs to another.
- Net it out, and state which one or two uncertain entries actually dominate the conclusion — that's the residual uncertainty worth resolving further.
Common mistakes
- Using "do nothing" as the baseline when a live, better alternative actually exists.
- Ignoring the long tail of maintenance costs that follow an initial investment.
- Counting sunk costs as if they belonged in the ledger.
- Treating hard-to-quantify entries as if they were zero, rather than estimating them explicitly.
Examples
- Whether to build an internal tool versus buying or doing without.
- Whether a recurring meeting series earns back its collective hours across attendees.
- Whether a regulation's compliance burden is proportionate to the protection it provides; whether to adopt a new dependency.
Related
- [[expected-value]] — the probabilistic version, used when entries are genuinely uncertain rather than point estimates.
- [[second-order-scan]] — often surfaces the hidden entries this ledger would otherwise miss.
- [[prioritization-triage]] — the natural next step once several cost-benefit ledgers need to be compared against each other.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: skyf0xx
- Source: skyf0xx/better-thinking
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://zenbin.org/p/better-thinking
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.