Install
$ agentstack add skill-social-media-skills-skills-data-and-original-research ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
data-and-original-research
The original-data content type — find a question inside a data void, run a sound method, analyse it honestly, voice the one finding that travels, and engineer it for citation. A study people have to cite; the format writers turn it into cuts, WoopSocial publishes, and recurring studies map into the content-calendar.
The POV: own a number and the internet has to come to you
Most content is undifferentiated — ~94% of published pages earn zero external links (per Backlinko). Original data is the rare exception: publications link to stories, not products, and a data finding is a story. It's also the #1 GEO asset — adding statistics is among the strongest levers for AI-answer visibility (per the Princeton/KDD GEO study), and original data is statistics nobody else owns. Brands skip it because it's harder than a listicle — which is exactly the moat. The catch: a study is worth nothing the moment one number is wrong. Rigor isn't pedantry; it's the entire value. So the skill is knowing what to study, how to get real data, and how to make the finding impossible not to cite — never inventing it.
Read these first
- brand-profile — the proprietary data/angle you actually own.
- audience-research — the question your audience (and journalists/AI) would cite.
The framework: PROVE
(Depth: references/the-prove-framework.md.)
- P — Pick a question inside a data void: a claim worth proving where good data doesn't exist and people
would cite the answer; advantage order = proprietary data > recurring niche survey > public-dataset analysis.
- R — Run a sound method: define population, sample frame, target n, recruitment, and neutral (non-leading)
questions before collecting; the agent designs, the human/tool fields it.
- O — Observe honestly: real data only; never invent or AI-synthesize data points; no p-hacking or
cherry-picking; disclose n, dates, method, limitations; small n = directional, not "most people."
- V — Voice the one finding that travels: the surprising-but-defensible headline stat (X% of Y do Z),
supported and never inflated (38% ≠ "nearly half"); one hero number, 2–3 supporting.
- E — Engineer for citation, then distribute: report page with visible methodology + date + "Last Updated"
stamp + charts + a copy-paste stat box with attribution link; atomize into cuts → the format writers; pitch journalists; seed across publications (the citation multiplier); WoopSocial publishes.
The reality (verify-quarterly)
Data-led content is the backbone of digital PR (~94.8% name it their primary tactic; original data ~+41% media coverage — per BuzzStream); data studies attract ~3.2× more links than opinion/how-to (per Backlinko via Searchlab). For AI search: adding statistics can lift AI-answer visibility ~30–41% (Princeton/KDD GEO study, cited — attribute); brand mentions can correlate with AI visibility more than raw links (Ahrefs ~75k-brand analysis); distributing across many publications multiplies citations; ~50% of AI-cited content is survey > public dataset > experiment), designed before collection (population, sample frame, n, neutral questions), analysed honestly (no p-hacking, no cherry-picking, limitations disclosed, small n framed as directional), with one surprising-but-defensible headline stat that's supported and never inflated; engineered for citation (visible methodology + date + "Last Updated" stamp + charts + copy-paste stat box with attribution link), atomized into cuts routed to the right format writers, pitched/distributed across publications, and published via WoopSocial; measured on referring domains/mentions/AI-citations/referral traffic/saves rather than likes; YMYL, privacy/consent, and conflict-of-interest handled; nothing fabricated; and correctly distinguished from educational-content-and-how-to, analytics-and-reporting, competitor-analysis, and trend-jacking.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: social-media-skills
- Source: social-media-skills/skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://social-media-skills.com
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.