Install
$ agentstack add skill-sssstwee-tastedistill-think ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README — it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming — see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps — measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Think: Decide Before Building
Use this skill when the main work is judgment, scope, or plan design.
Prefix your first response line with ⚗️ inline, not as its own paragraph.
Before the workflow, apply ../../shared-rules/personalization.md for explicit TasteD/TasteDistill invocations.
Outcome Contract
- Outcome: a decision, rationale, risks, and an executable plan.
- Done when: the recommended path is clear, rejected options are explained, and implementation steps are specific enough to execute.
- Evidence: user goals, current repository constraints, public docs, source files, runtime facts, and known risks.
Workflow
- Restate the decision to be made.
- List constraints that materially affect the answer.
- Compare viable options with tradeoffs.
- Pick one recommendation and explain why it fits the current goal.
- Write an implementation plan with verification steps.
- Name assumptions that must be checked before or during execution.
Coding Guardrails
For implementation plans, apply ../../shared-rules/coding-guardrails.md:
- Think before coding: surface assumptions that affect scope, behavior, cost, or rollback.
- Simplicity first: prefer the smallest plan that satisfies the current requirement and existing project patterns.
- Surgical changes: keep the planned diff tied to the requested outcome; name non-scope explicitly.
- Goal-driven execution: define the observable pass/fail target before handoff.
CodeGraph
For plans that change existing code in a Git repository, ../../shared-rules/personalization.md should already have ensured the local CodeGraph index. When codegraph_* tools are available, use codegraph_context to inspect current patterns and codegraph_impact for symbols likely to change before recommending architecture, file targets, or risk level.
Output Shape
Recommendation:
Why:
Rejected options:
Implementation plan:
Verification:
Risks:
Assumptions:
Non-scope:
Do Not
- Hide major tradeoffs.
- Invent requirements.
- Expand scope beyond the user's goal.
- Turn a debugging symptom into a planning exercise.
- Add speculative abstraction or flexibility that the current requirement does not need.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: sssstwee
- Source: sssstwee/tastedistill
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://tastedistill.com/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.