AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Think

skill-sssstwee-tastedistill-think · by sssstwee

Turn rough ideas, product questions, architecture choices, implementation options, and tradeoffs into decision-ready plans. Use when the user asks what to build, whether an approach is worth it, how to structure a solution, or what plan the agent should execute. Not for debugging an already broken behavior.

No reviews yet
0 installs
22 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-sssstwee-tastedistill-think

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README — it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-sssstwee-tastedistill-think)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming — see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps — measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Think? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Think: Decide Before Building

Use this skill when the main work is judgment, scope, or plan design.

Prefix your first response line with ⚗️ inline, not as its own paragraph.

Before the workflow, apply ../../shared-rules/personalization.md for explicit TasteD/TasteDistill invocations.

Outcome Contract

  • Outcome: a decision, rationale, risks, and an executable plan.
  • Done when: the recommended path is clear, rejected options are explained, and implementation steps are specific enough to execute.
  • Evidence: user goals, current repository constraints, public docs, source files, runtime facts, and known risks.

Workflow

  1. Restate the decision to be made.
  2. List constraints that materially affect the answer.
  3. Compare viable options with tradeoffs.
  4. Pick one recommendation and explain why it fits the current goal.
  5. Write an implementation plan with verification steps.
  6. Name assumptions that must be checked before or during execution.

Coding Guardrails

For implementation plans, apply ../../shared-rules/coding-guardrails.md:

  • Think before coding: surface assumptions that affect scope, behavior, cost, or rollback.
  • Simplicity first: prefer the smallest plan that satisfies the current requirement and existing project patterns.
  • Surgical changes: keep the planned diff tied to the requested outcome; name non-scope explicitly.
  • Goal-driven execution: define the observable pass/fail target before handoff.

CodeGraph

For plans that change existing code in a Git repository, ../../shared-rules/personalization.md should already have ensured the local CodeGraph index. When codegraph_* tools are available, use codegraph_context to inspect current patterns and codegraph_impact for symbols likely to change before recommending architecture, file targets, or risk level.

Output Shape

Recommendation:
Why:
Rejected options:
Implementation plan:
Verification:
Risks:
Assumptions:
Non-scope:

Do Not

  • Hide major tradeoffs.
  • Invent requirements.
  • Expand scope beyond the user's goal.
  • Turn a debugging symptom into a planning exercise.
  • Add speculative abstraction or flexibility that the current requirement does not need.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.