Install
$ agentstack add skill-stark-ai-de-agent-skills-cursor-memory-curator ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Cursor Memory Curator
Goal
Audit Cursor durable context as user-owned agent state: expose stale, unsafe, duplicated, ignored, conflicting, or misplaced rules; propose better destinations; and apply cleanup only after a report, backup, and explicit approval.
Keep the subject scoped to Cursor Project Rules, legacy .cursorrules, AGENTS.md, User Rules, Team Rules, and user-maintained Cursor memory-bank artifacts. Do not treat this as a Codex memory curator.
When to use
- The user asks to review, audit, clean up, prune, rewrite, or remove Cursor rules or persistent Cursor context.
- The user mentions
.cursor/rules,.cursorrules, Cursor User Rules, Cursor Team Rules, stale rules, rule conflicts, or Cursor context pollution. - The user asks whether a durable Cursor instruction belongs in a project rule,
AGENTS.md, repo docs, User Rules, Team Rules, a skill, config, or deletion. - The user reports that Cursor keeps forgetting, keeps using stale guidance, or is applying old project instructions.
When not to use
- Do not use for Codex memory cleanup; use a Codex memory skill instead.
- Do not use for ordinary repo documentation cleanup unless Cursor durable context is part of the task.
- Do not use for generic prompt engineering that does not inspect Cursor persistent context.
- Do not modify files when the user only asked for review.
- Do not edit User Rules or Team Rules directly unless Cursor exposes a documented file-backed artifact or the user provides an explicit exported file path and approves edits.
Inputs to inspect
- Current repo root, or the user-provided repo path.
.cursor/rules/**/*.mdcand plain.mdfiles under.cursor/rules.- Legacy
.cursorrules. - Root and nested
AGENTS.mdfiles when relevant to Cursor behavior. - User-provided User Rules or Team Rules exports.
- User-provided Cursor memory-bank paths such as
memory-bank/,docs/memory/, or.cursor/memory-bank/. references/context-surface-anatomy.mdwhen deciding which Cursor surface owns a claim.references/classification-rubric.mdwhen a destination is not obvious.references/conflict-resolution.mdwhen rules conflict.references/safe-editing-procedure.mdbefore modifying context files.assets/review-report-template.mdwhen report shape is unclear.assets/cleanup-plan-template.mdwhen a structured cleanup plan is useful or requested.
Workflow
- Identify the target repo path from the user request or current working directory.
- Inventory Cursor context without dumping contents:
``bash node scripts/inventory-cursor-context.mjs --repo . ``
Add --memory-bank PATH for explicit memory-bank artifacts. Use --json when structured evidence is useful.
- Run the redacted risk scanner when looking for sensitive, stale, broad, ignored, legacy, local, or conflict-prone rules:
``bash node scripts/scan-cursor-context-risks.mjs --repo . --json ``
Exit code 1 means findings were found, not that the scan failed. Summarize counts and highest-signal redacted findings instead of pasting the full payload.
- Parse
.mdcfrontmatter fields that affect Cursor behavior:description,globs, andalwaysApply. - Flag plain
.mdfiles under.cursor/rulesas ignored by Cursor Project Rules metadata and recommend conversion to.mdcor relocation toAGENTS.md. - Treat User Rules and Team Rules as settings evidence or user-provided exports unless a current documented filesystem path is available.
- Read context files in bounded chunks and redact sensitive values.
- Extract one atomic claim per row. Split compound rules before classification.
- Verify disputed claims against only the repo files needed for the dispute. Load
references/conflict-resolution.mdwhen precedence is unclear. - Assign exactly one primary classification per atomic claim:
KEEP,KEEP BUT REWRITE,MOVE TO CURSOR PROJECT RULE,MOVE TO AGENTS.md,MOVE TO REPO DOCS,MOVE TO CURSOR USER RULES,MOVE TO CURSOR TEAM RULES,MOVE TO SKILL,MOVE TO CONFIG,DELETE, orASK USER. - Tag high-risk entries as useful context only:
stale,duplicated,too-broad,too-specific,repo-specific,workflow,config,sensitive,conflicting,ignored,legacy, oruseful. - Add confidence (
high,medium, orlow) and a proposed action to every entry. - Produce the review report before editing. Add a structured cleanup plan when the user wants ID-by-ID approval, the schema is unknown, sensitive cleanup is proposed, or the edit set is large.
- If cleanup is approved, load
references/safe-editing-procedure.md, runnode scripts/backup-cursor-context.mjs --repo ., apply only approved minimal edits by entry ID, re-read changed sections, and show a trimmed diff summary.
Safety rules
- Never silently delete, rewrite, truncate, or move Cursor context files.
- Ask exactly this before content-changing cleanup:
``text Do you want me to apply the safe cleanup now? I will back up the Cursor context files first. ``
- Do not edit unless the user clearly approves that cleanup.
- Back up Cursor context files before approved edits and report the backup path.
- Do not print full secrets, tokens, credentials, customer data, private identifiers, or sensitive personal data.
- If secret-like data is found, redact values in output, identify file and line when possible, recommend removal, and recommend rotation for real credentials.
- If a memory-bank schema is unclear, do not edit the original artifact. Write a sibling
.proposed.mdcleanup plan instead. - Do not edit User Rules or Team Rules from chat-only summaries; give manual action recommendations instead.
- Do not apply repo-specific assumptions globally. Prefer
AGENTS.md, Cursor Project Rules, or repo docs for repo rules. - Do not run broad destructive commands.
References
Read only when needed:
references/context-surface-anatomy.mdfor Cursor Project Rules, legacy rules,AGENTS.md, User Rules, Team Rules, and memory-bank artifacts.references/classification-rubric.mdfor detailed classification rules and rewrite examples.references/conflict-resolution.mdfor precedence rules when Cursor context conflicts with repo evidence.references/example-review-report.mdfor report shape examples.references/safe-editing-procedure.mdbefore modifying context files.assets/review-report-template.mdwhen a concise report template is useful.assets/cleanup-plan-template.mdwhen a structured cleanup plan is needed.
Scripts
Use only when needed. All scripts are non-interactive, use Node.js stdlib only, and accept --help.
node scripts/inventory-cursor-context.mjs [--repo PATH] [--memory-bank PATH] [--json]
node scripts/scan-cursor-context-risks.mjs [--repo PATH] [--memory-bank PATH] [--json] [--max-findings N]
node scripts/backup-cursor-context.mjs [--repo PATH] [--memory-bank PATH]
inventory-cursor-context.mjsis read-only and lists Cursor context files with type, size, modified time, and.mdcfrontmatter metadata.scan-cursor-context-risks.mjsis read-only, redacts matching lines by default, labels risk categories, limits returned findings, and exits1when findings exist.backup-cursor-context.mjscreates a timestamped backup copy under the target repo; it does not edit or delete context files.
Output format
Before edits, lead with this report shape:
# Cursor Memory Review
## Top Decisions
1.
2.
3.
## Summary
- Cursor context files inspected:
- Entries extracted:
- Keep:
- Rewrite:
- Move to Cursor Project Rule:
- Move to AGENTS.md:
- Move to repo docs:
- Move to Cursor User Rules:
- Move to Cursor Team Rules:
- Move to skill:
- Move to config:
- Delete:
- Ask user:
## Highest-Risk Context
| ID | Source | Risk | Recommendation |
| --- | ------ | ---- | -------------- |
## Proposed Cleanup Table
| ID | Current claim | Classification | Risk tags | Confidence | Reason | Proposed action |
| --- | ------------- | -------------- | --------- | ---------- | ------ | --------------- |
## Conflict Notes
| ID | Higher source | Conflict | Recommendation |
| --- | ------------- | -------- | -------------- |
## Manual Cursor Settings Actions
- User Rules:
- Team Rules:
## Optional Cleanup Plan Artifact
- Plan path:
- Plan format: `assets/cleanup-plan-template.md`
## Recommended Next Action
After approved edits, also include backup path, files changed, trimmed diff summary, skipped manual settings actions, and residual risks.
Completion criteria
- Relevant Cursor context files were inventoried, or missing paths were reported.
.mdcfrontmatter was considered for Project Rules.- User Rules and Team Rules were treated as settings evidence or user-provided exports, not silently edited.
- Entries were extracted as atomic claims.
- Each entry has exactly one primary classification.
- Each entry has risk tags, confidence, and a proposed action.
- Conflicts cite the higher-precedence source that makes the rule stale or misplaced.
- A structured cleanup plan is provided when the user wants ID-by-ID approval, the schema is unknown, sensitive cleanup is proposed, or the edit set is large.
- No context edit happened before explicit approval.
- Any approved edit has a backup path and verification diff summary.
Failure modes
- No Cursor files: report that no
.cursor/rules,.cursorrules, or relevantAGENTS.mdfiles were found, then ask whether the user has exported User Rules, Team Rules, or memory-bank artifacts. - User or Team Rules unavailable: provide manual recommendations instead of pretending to edit settings.
- Plain
.mdunder.cursor/rules: flag it as an ignored or metadata-less Project Rule candidate and recommend.mdcconversion orAGENTS.mdrelocation. - Memory-bank schema unknown: write proposed replacements to a sibling
.proposed.mdfile instead of editing the original. - Sensitive data found: redact the value, identify file and line when possible, recommend removal, require backup before edits, and recommend rotation for real credentials.
- Conflicting rules: cite the conflict, prefer current prompt and repo evidence, then classify as rewrite, move, delete, or ask-user.
- Backup failure: do not edit context files.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: stark-ai-de
- Source: stark-ai-de/agent-skills
- License: Apache-2.0
- Homepage: https://stark-ai-de.github.io/agent-skills/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.