Install
$ agentstack add skill-stefan-jansen-claude-code-toolkit-sql-optimization ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
SQL Query Optimization Patterns
Comprehensive guide to optimizing SQL queries for performance, including EXPLAIN plan analysis, index design strategies, query rewriting patterns, and N+1 query detection. Works across PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite.
Quick Reference
When to use this skill:
- Slow database queries (>100ms for simple queries, >1s for complex)
- High database CPU usage
- Analyzing EXPLAIN plans
- Designing database indexes
- Debugging N+1 query problems
- Optimizing JOIN operations
- Reducing table scans
Common triggers:
- "This query is too slow"
- "How do I optimize this SQL"
- "What indexes should I add"
- "Explain this EXPLAIN plan"
- "Fix N+1 queries"
- "Database CPU at 100%"
Typical improvements:
- 3 seconds → 50ms (60x faster)
- Full table scan → Index scan
- 1000 queries → 2 queries (N+1 elimination)
Part 1: Understanding EXPLAIN Plans
Reading PostgreSQL EXPLAIN
EXPLAIN ANALYZE
SELECT u.name, p.title
FROM users u
JOIN posts p ON u.id = p.user_id
WHERE u.created_at > '2024-01-01'
ORDER BY p.created_at DESC
LIMIT 10;
Key Metrics to Watch:
- Seq Scan (bad): Full table scan, reads every row
- Index Scan (good): Uses index, reads only needed rows
- Cost: Estimated computational cost (lower is better)
- Actual time: Real execution time in milliseconds
- Rows: Number of rows processed at each step
Bad EXPLAIN Example
Seq Scan on users u (cost=0.00..1234.00 rows=1000 width=50)
(actual time=0.123..45.678 rows=950 loops=1)
Filter: (created_at > '2024-01-01'::date)
Rows Removed by Filter: 50000
Planning Time: 0.234 ms
Execution Time: 3456.789 ms
Problems:
- Seq Scan: Reading entire table (50,950 rows)
- Rows Removed by Filter: Filtering after reading (wasteful)
- Execution Time: 3.5 seconds (way too slow)
Good EXPLAIN Example (After Index)
Index Scan using users_created_at_idx on users u
(cost=0.29..123.45 rows=950 width=50)
(actual time=0.012..3.456 rows=950 loops=1)
Index Cond: (created_at > '2024-01-01'::date)
Planning Time: 0.123 ms
Execution Time: 4.567 ms
Improvements:
- Index Scan: Using index (only reads needed rows)
- Index Cond: Filtering during index scan (efficient)
- Execution Time: 4.5ms (750x faster!)
Part 2: Index Design Strategies
When to Add an Index
✅ Add index when:
- Column frequently in WHERE clauses
- Column frequently in JOIN conditions
- Column frequently in ORDER BY
- Query does Seq Scan on large table (>10K rows)
- Query execution time >100ms
❌ Don't add index when:
- Table has '2024-01-01'
-- ❌ Doesn't use index (skips first column) WHERE status = 'pending' WHERE created_at > '2024-01-01'
### Partial Indexes (Filtered)
**Index only subset of rows** (smaller, faster):
```sql
-- Only index active users
CREATE INDEX idx_users_active_email
ON users(email)
WHERE status = 'active';
-- Query that uses partial index
SELECT * FROM users
WHERE email = 'user@example.com'
AND status = 'active'; -- Must include filter condition!
Benefits:
- Smaller index (faster scans, less storage)
- Only indexes rows you actually query
- Great for status fields with skewed distribution
Covering Indexes (INCLUDE)
Include columns in index to avoid table access:
-- Postgres: INCLUDE clause
CREATE INDEX idx_users_email_covering
ON users(email)
INCLUDE (name, created_at);
-- Query doesn't need to access table (all data in index)
SELECT name, created_at FROM users WHERE email = 'user@example.com';
Benefit: Index-Only Scan (even faster than Index Scan)
Part 3: Query Rewriting Patterns
Problem 1: SELECT * (Fetching Unnecessary Data)
❌ Bad (fetches all columns):
SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = 123;
✅ Good (fetches only needed columns):
SELECT id, name, email FROM users WHERE id = 123;
Impact:
- Smaller result set
- Less memory usage
- Faster network transfer
- Can use covering indexes
Problem 2: N+1 Queries
❌ Bad (1 query for posts + N queries for users):
# 1 query
posts = db.execute("SELECT * FROM posts LIMIT 10")
# N queries (10 separate queries!)
for post in posts:
user = db.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", post.user_id)
print(f"{user.name}: {post.title}")
✅ Good (2 queries total):
# 1 query for posts
posts = db.execute("SELECT * FROM posts LIMIT 10")
# 1 query for all users
user_ids = [p.user_id for p in posts]
users = db.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id IN (?)", user_ids)
users_by_id = {u.id: u for u in users}
# No additional queries
for post in posts:
user = users_by_id[post.user_id]
print(f"{user.name}: {post.title}")
Even Better (1 query with JOIN):
SELECT u.name, p.title
FROM posts p
JOIN users u ON p.user_id = u.id
LIMIT 10;
Problem 3: Implicit Type Conversion
❌ Bad (index not used due to implicit conversion):
-- user_id is INTEGER, but '123' is string
SELECT * FROM posts WHERE user_id = '123'; -- Seq Scan!
✅ Good (explicit type, index used):
SELECT * FROM posts WHERE user_id = 123; -- Index Scan
Problem 4: Function Calls in WHERE Clause
❌ Bad (can't use index):
-- Function prevents index usage
SELECT * FROM users WHERE LOWER(email) = 'user@example.com';
✅ Good (use functional index):
-- Create index on function result
CREATE INDEX idx_users_lower_email ON users(LOWER(email));
-- Now query can use index
SELECT * FROM users WHERE LOWER(email) = 'user@example.com';
✅ Even Better (store lowercase, regular index):
-- Store email in lowercase
CREATE INDEX idx_users_email ON users(email);
-- Query with lowercase value
SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = LOWER('user@example.com');
Problem 5: OR Conditions
❌ Bad (often does Seq Scan):
SELECT * FROM users
WHERE email = 'user@example.com'
OR username = 'johndoe';
✅ Good (use UNION, allows index usage):
SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = 'user@example.com'
UNION
SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = 'johndoe';
Problem 6: NOT IN with Subquery
❌ Bad (very slow, especially with large subquery):
SELECT * FROM users
WHERE id NOT IN (SELECT user_id FROM blocked_users);
✅ Good (use LEFT JOIN with NULL check):
SELECT u.*
FROM users u
LEFT JOIN blocked_users b ON u.id = b.user_id
WHERE b.user_id IS NULL;
Part 4: JOIN Optimization
JOIN Order Matters
Database optimizes join order, but you can help:
Small table first, large table second:
-- Good: Join small table (categories: 10 rows) to large table (products: 10M rows)
SELECT p.*
FROM categories c
JOIN products p ON c.id = p.category_id
WHERE c.name = 'Electronics';
Avoid Cartesian Products
❌ Bad (produces rows1 × rows2 × rows3):
SELECT *
FROM users, posts, comments; -- 100 × 10000 × 50000 = 50 billion rows!
✅ Good (proper JOIN conditions):
SELECT *
FROM users u
JOIN posts p ON u.id = p.user_id
JOIN comments c ON p.id = c.post_id;
EXISTS vs IN for Subqueries
Scenario: Find users who have at least one post
❌ Slower (IN loads all post IDs):
SELECT * FROM users
WHERE id IN (SELECT user_id FROM posts);
✅ Faster (EXISTS stops at first match):
SELECT * FROM users u
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM posts p WHERE p.user_id = u.id);
JOIN vs Subquery
Use JOIN when you need data from both tables:
SELECT u.name, p.title
FROM users u
JOIN posts p ON u.id = p.user_id;
Use Subquery when you only need filtering:
SELECT * FROM users
WHERE id IN (SELECT DISTINCT user_id FROM posts);
Part 5: Aggregation Optimization
COUNT(*) Optimization
Problem: COUNT(*) on large tables is slow
❌ Slow (counts all rows):
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders; -- Full table scan on 10M rows
✅ Faster (approximate count from statistics):
-- PostgreSQL: Use statistics (fast but approximate)
SELECT reltuples::bigint AS estimate
FROM pg_class
WHERE relname = 'orders';
✅ Also Good (exact count with index):
-- If you have an index, COUNT can use index-only scan
CREATE INDEX idx_orders_id ON orders(id);
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders; -- Index-only scan
GROUP BY Optimization
❌ Bad (groups after fetching all data):
SELECT user_id, COUNT(*)
FROM posts
GROUP BY user_id;
✅ Good (index helps grouping):
-- Create index on grouped column
CREATE INDEX idx_posts_user_id ON posts(user_id);
SELECT user_id, COUNT(*)
FROM posts
GROUP BY user_id; -- Can use index for grouping
HAVING vs WHERE
❌ Bad (filters after grouping):
SELECT user_id, COUNT(*) as post_count
FROM posts
GROUP BY user_id
HAVING user_id > 1000; -- Filters after grouping all users
✅ Good (filters before grouping):
SELECT user_id, COUNT(*) as post_count
FROM posts
WHERE user_id > 1000 -- Filters before grouping (can use index)
GROUP BY user_id;
Part 6: Pagination Optimization
OFFSET is Slow for Large Offsets
❌ Bad (OFFSET scans all skipped rows):
-- Page 1000 (skips 50,000 rows, then returns 50)
SELECT * FROM posts
ORDER BY created_at DESC
LIMIT 50 OFFSET 50000; -- Scans 50,050 rows!
✅ Good (keyset pagination with WHERE):
-- Save last seen ID from previous page
SELECT * FROM posts
WHERE created_at 0
ORDER BY seq_tup_read DESC
LIMIT 25;
Find Unused Indexes (PostgreSQL)
-- Indexes that are never used
SELECT
schemaname,
tablename,
indexname,
idx_scan,
pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size(indexrelid)) AS size
FROM pg_stat_user_indexes
WHERE idx_scan = 0
AND indexrelname NOT LIKE '%_pkey' -- Exclude primary keys
ORDER BY pg_relation_size(indexrelid) DESC;
Check Index Bloat
-- Postgres: Check for bloated indexes
SELECT
schemaname,
tablename,
indexname,
pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size(indexrelid)) AS size
FROM pg_stat_user_indexes
ORDER BY pg_relation_size(indexrelid) DESC;
-- Rebuild bloated indexes
REINDEX INDEX index_name;
Part 9: Common Patterns by Use Case
Pattern 1: Recent Records with Pagination
-- Create composite index
CREATE INDEX idx_posts_created_user ON posts(created_at DESC, user_id);
-- Query uses index efficiently
SELECT * FROM posts
WHERE user_id = 123
ORDER BY created_at DESC
LIMIT 20;
Pattern 2: Search Across Multiple Columns
-- Create GIN index for full-text search (Postgres)
CREATE INDEX idx_posts_search ON posts
USING gin(to_tsvector('english', title || ' ' || content));
-- Fast full-text search
SELECT * FROM posts
WHERE to_tsvector('english', title || ' ' || content) @@
to_tsquery('english', 'database & optimization');
Pattern 3: Range Queries
-- Create index on range column
CREATE INDEX idx_orders_created_at ON orders(created_at);
-- Query uses index
SELECT * FROM orders
WHERE created_at BETWEEN '2024-01-01' AND '2024-01-31'
ORDER BY created_at;
Pattern 4: Distinct Values with Filter
-- Create composite index
CREATE INDEX idx_posts_category_user ON posts(category_id, user_id);
-- Query uses index
SELECT DISTINCT category_id
FROM posts
WHERE user_id = 123;
Part 10: Quick Optimization Checklist
Diagnosis:
- [ ] Run EXPLAIN ANALYZE on slow queries
- [ ] Check for Seq Scan on tables >10K rows
- [ ] Look for missing indexes
- [ ] Identify N+1 query patterns
- [ ] Check query execution time (aim for <100ms)
Index Strategy:
- [ ] Index columns in WHERE clauses
- [ ] Index columns in JOIN conditions
- [ ] Index columns in ORDER BY
- [ ] Use composite indexes for multi-column queries
- [ ] Consider partial indexes for filtered queries
- [ ] Remove unused indexes
Query Rewriting:
- [ ] Select only needed columns (not SELECT *)
- [ ] Use JOIN instead of N+1 queries
- [ ] Use proper types (avoid implicit conversion)
- [ ] Avoid functions in WHERE (use functional indexes)
- [ ] Use UNION instead of OR for multiple conditions
- [ ] Use EXISTS instead of IN for large subqueries
Pagination:
- [ ] Use keyset pagination (not OFFSET) for large datasets
- [ ] Include stable sort column (id) in pagination
- [ ] Index pagination columns
Monitoring:
- [ ] Enable query logging for slow queries
- [ ] Monitor index usage
- [ ] Check for index bloat
- [ ] Regularly VACUUM ANALYZE (Postgres)
Resources
PostgreSQL:
- EXPLAIN docs: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-explain.html
- Index types: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/indexes-types.html
- Performance tips: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Performance_Optimization
MySQL:
- EXPLAIN output: https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/explain-output.html
- Optimization: https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/optimization.html
Tools:
- pgAdmin (Postgres GUI)
- MySQL Workbench
- DBeaver (multi-database)
- explain.depesz.com (Postgres EXPLAIN visualizer)
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: stefan-jansen
- Source: stefan-jansen/claude-code-toolkit
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://www.applied-ai.com/open-source/claude-code-toolkit/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.