Install
$ agentstack add skill-steph-dove-klaussy-agents-fastapi-precommit ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Apply exactly these five lenses to the CHANGED lines and their immediate context — nothing else. If no diff is inlined for you, read the staged change with git diff --cached first.
LENS 1 — Silent failures (your primary lens):
- Empty or swallowing catch blocks (caught errors not rethrown, surfaced, or meaningfully handled)
- Catch-and-continue where later code depends on the failed step
- Fallback values that mask failures (return null/[]/default on error with no signal to the caller or user)
- Success reported over partial failure (function returns ok / UI shows success when a sub-step failed)
- Errors logged where nobody looks (console/debug-level) when the user or caller needed to know
- Fire-and-forget promises / missing rejection handlers
- Optional chaining or defaults that convert real bugs into silent no-ops
- Killed/ignored exit codes, suppressed stderr
LENS 2 — Secrets & credentials (always Severity: High):
- API keys, tokens, passwords, private keys, connection strings with credentials, high-entropy literals that look like secrets — in ADDED lines. Placeholder values that are obviously fake (e.g. "YOURAPIKEY", "xxx") are NOT findings.
LENS 3 — Debug leftovers (Severity: Low):
- Added print-debugging (console.log/print/dbg!) that is clearly scaffolding rather than intentional logging per this repo's conventions
- Newly commented-out blocks of code
- Added TODO/FIXME/HACK markers with no ticket reference
LENS 4 — Blatant correctness landmines (Severity: High ONLY — if you are not CERTAIN it is broken, do not report it):
- Unreachable code introduced by the change
- Conditions that are always true/false, inverted comparisons, assignment-in-condition
- Off-by-default boolean confusion (e.g. flag checked with the opposite sense of every other use in the file)
LENS 5 — Excessive comments (Severity: Low):
- Comments on ADDED lines that restate what the code plainly does ("// increment i", "// loop over the items", "// set x to 5"), narrate obvious steps, or just echo the function/variable name.
- Multi-line block comments where a single short line (or no comment) would carry the same information.
- Changelog / narration / "AI-tell" comments ("// Now we handle the case where…", "// This function will…", "// Added to fix the bug").
For each, the fix is: delete it (or condense to a short one-liner). Keep ONLY short comments that explain WHY — non-obvious intent, gotchas, links, or invariants. Do NOT flag: docstrings/JSDoc on public APIs, license/file headers, or genuinely clarifying "why" comments.
Explicitly NOT in scope: naming, formatting, performance, architecture, test coverage, lint-level nits, anything outside the diff. Do not suggest refactors. (Comment hygiene IS in scope — that is lens 5.)
Be precise and skeptical, but only report real issues — a deliberate, well-signposted degradation (comment explains it, user is notified elsewhere) is NOT a finding.
For each finding, give its severity, which lens caught it, the file:line, and the minimal fix in one or two lines. If there are no findings, say so plainly.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: steph-dove
- Source: steph-dove/klaussy-agents
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://klaussy.com
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.