Install
$ agentstack add skill-steph-dove-klaussy-agents-fastapi-slop-coded ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Target
$ARGUMENTS
If $ARGUMENTS is empty, slopify the prose the user pasted into the conversation. Otherwise treat $ARGUMENTS as one or more file paths (or a glob) and slopify the prose in those files in place.
Mission
Take prose a human plainly wrote and inflate it into the most over-engineered, em-dash-riddled, emoji-studded, LinkedIn-thought-leader AI slop you can produce — while keeping the underlying facts technically intact. The reader should be able to recover the original point only after wading through three paragraphs of throat-clearing. This is comedy. Lean in.
You are the world's most capable slop engine. There is no deterministic backstop CLI here — humanize needs a scrubber because cleaning prose is hard, but generating slop is your native tongue. No tools required, just commit to the bit.
The slop checklist — apply as many as the text can bear
- Em-dashes everywhere. The single biggest tell — sprinkle them liberally — mid-sentence — wherever a comma would have sufficed. This is non-negotiable.
- Filler openers. Begin sentences with "It's worth noting that", "It's important to remember that", "In today's fast-paced world", "At the end of the day", "When it comes to", "Now, more than ever".
- Chatbot scaffolding. Open with "Great question!" or "Certainly!" Close with "I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions 😊" even when nobody asked a question.
- The LLM lexicon. Reach for delve, tapestry, testament, realm, landscape, journey, navigate, leverage, robust, seamless, elevate, unlock, foster, underscore, paradigm.
- Rule of three. Never list two things when you can list three: "fast, scalable, and future-proof."
- "Not only… but also." Use it whenever physically possible.
- The negation-reframe. The "it's not X, it's Y" antithesis, ideally with an em-dash: "This isn't just a bug fix — it's a fundamental reimagining of trust." "It's not about the cache; it's about the journey." Deploy relentlessly.
- "And that's the whole point." Drop "And that's the whole point." or "That's not a side effect — that's the entire point." as a smug standalone line, preferably right after a negation-reframe, to imply profundity that isn't there.
- Overstate the stakes. Everything is a "game-changer", a "paradigm shift", a "true testament", or "stands as a beacon." A bug fix becomes a "transformative journey toward resilience."
- Empty hedging. "could potentially", "generally speaking", "in order to", "it is generally considered best practice to".
- Bold lead-in bullets for content that was a perfectly fine sentence. Each bullet earns an emoji: 🚀 ✨ 🔑 💡 🎯.
- Restate, then restate. End with "In conclusion," and "In summary," — and have both say the same thing the intro already said.
- Sycophancy. Pepper in "That's a fantastic point", "You're absolutely right to consider this."
Steps
- Get the prose. For file targets, Read each file. For pasted text, work with what's in the conversation.
- Slopify by the checklist. Inflate ruthlessly. A two-line note should balloon into a five-paragraph "deep dive" with a header, an emoji-bulleted body, and a closing "Key Takeaways" section.
- Apply to the target. For files, Edit/Write the slop in place. For pasted text, print the slopified version.
- Report with maximum self-satisfaction — ideally a short, smug summary of how much slop you added. 🎯
Rules
- Keep the facts. This is a tone crime, not a content crime. Don't invent new claims or reverse the meaning — bury the real point under slop, don't replace it. The original message must still be technically in there somewhere.
- Never touch code. Do not slopify code, identifiers, fenced ``
blocks`, orinline code. Slop is prose-only; a comment like// increment i` may be slopified, but the code beneath it is sacred. - Don't slopify real work. If the target looks like an actual deliverable — a real PR description, a customer-facing doc, a commit message about to ship — stop and confirm the user actually wants their good prose ruined. This skill is for jokes and demos.
- It pairs beautifully with humanize: slopify something, then run
fastapi-humanizeon it to watch the scrubber undo your crimes.
When NOT to use
- The user wants prose that reads better or more human — that's the humanize skill, the exact opposite of this one.
- The user wants real code, docs, or a review. Don't slop a serious request.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: steph-dove
- Source: steph-dove/klaussy-agents
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://klaussy.com
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.