Scalping

Strategy: Scalp · Momentum Bursts

When to use

A user asks for a scalping strategy, "fast in/out", "5m strategy", "ride the thrust", "buy when volume spikes". Single-pair, tight stops, time-stopped trades.

Honest framing

The reference backtest below was unprofitable (33% WR, −0.34% PnL, Sharpe −5.6) on SOL 5m over April 2026. The strategy executes correctly — it's not broken — it's just a losing parameter set on this window. The 0.6% target / 0.4% stop ratio needs ~41% hit rate to break even before fees, which the entry filter didn't deliver. Do not deploy as-is. Tune the entry threshold and validate before recommending to a user.

This skill exists as a structural template for high-turnover momentum entries. Real edge requires parameter search, regime filtering, or a different signal.

Backtest reference

| Window | SOL/USDC:USDC 5m, 2026-04-01 → 2026-05-01 (30 days) | |---|---| | Trades | 76 | | Win rate | 33% | | Wallet PnL | −0.34% | | Sharpe | −5.6 | | Backtest ID | 01kqypvbmjjhqjn3ae8bgqr9p0 |

Reference implementation

from freqtrade.strategy import IStrategy
from datetime import datetime
import pandas as pd
import talib.abstract as ta

class SolScalpMomentumStrategy(IStrategy):
    minimal_roi = {"0": 0.006}    # 0.6% profit target
    stoploss = -0.004              # 0.4% stop
    trailing_stop = False
    timeframe = "5m"
    process_only_new_candles = True
    startup_candle_count = 100
    can_short = False

    def populate_indicators(self, dataframe: pd.DataFrame, metadata: dict) -> pd.DataFrame:
        # Session VWAP approximation over the last 288 bars (~24h).
        tp = (dataframe["high"] + dataframe["low"] + dataframe["close"]) / 3.0
        pv = tp * dataframe["volume"]
        dataframe["vwap"] = pv.rolling(288).sum() / dataframe["volume"].rolling(288).sum()
        dataframe["rsi"] = ta.RSI(dataframe, timeperiod=14)
        dataframe["vol_avg20"] = dataframe["volume"].rolling(20).mean()
        dataframe["vol_thrust"] = dataframe["volume"] / dataframe["vol_avg20"]
        return dataframe

    def populate_entry_trend(self, dataframe: pd.DataFrame, metadata: dict) -> pd.DataFrame:
        dataframe.loc[
            (dataframe["close"] > dataframe["vwap"])
            & (dataframe["rsi"] > 70)
            & (dataframe["vol_thrust"] > 2.0),
            "enter_long",
        ] = 1
        return dataframe

    def populate_exit_trend(self, dataframe: pd.DataFrame, metadata: dict) -> pd.DataFrame:
        dataframe.loc[(dataframe["rsi"] = 12 * 60:
            return "time_stop_12m"
        return None

Config requirements

{
  "exchange": { "name": "hyperliquid", "pair_whitelist": ["SOL/USDC:USDC"] },
  "stake_currency": "USDC",
  "stake_amount": 100,
  "timeframe": "5m",
  "max_open_trades": 1,
  "stoploss": -0.004,
  "minimal_roi": { "0": 0.006 },
  "trading_mode": "futures",
  "margin_mode": "cross",
  "entry_pricing": { "price_side": "same" },
  "exit_pricing": { "price_side": "same" },
  "pairlists": [{ "method": "StaticPairList" }]
}

Tunable parameters

| Knob | Effect | |---|---| | rsi > 70 | Stricter (> 80) → fewer entries, only the strongest thrusts. | | vol_thrust > 2.0 | Tighter (> 3.0) → only volume blowouts; very rare. | | 0.006 ROI | Wider target → more time in trade, more tail risk. | | 0.004 stop | Tighter stop → more stops out, lower per-trade loss. | | 12 * 60 time stop | Faster timeout → more trades but lower edge per trade. |

Why this loses (and how to fix)

Three structural issues in the reference parameters:

1. No regime filter: enters in chop AND in trend. Chop kills the 0.6% target before it hits.
2. Entry on overbought + thrust: RSI > 70 plus high volume usually marks a local top, not a continuation. Inverting (rsi 2.0) for a fade entry is worth testing.
3. Single pair: Scalping edges thin out on a single asset. Top-30 perp scan with VolumePairList increases hit count, lets the law of large numbers help.

Practical refinements before suggesting to a user:

• Add a higher-timeframe trend filter (1h close > 1h ema_50).
• Use ATR-scaled stops instead of fixed 0.4%.
• Test the inverted (mean-reversion-on-thrust) variant.

Common pitfalls

1. Slippage eats the edge. A 0.6% target on a 5m candle leaves ~3 ticks of room. With Hyperliquid taker fee + slippage, effective edge is closer to 0.4% — barely above the stop. See fees-optimizations.
2. startup_candle_count too low. The 288-bar VWAP needs 288 bars of warmup; default 30 produces NaN VWAP for the first 24h.
3. Single-pair scalping is undercapitalized signal. 76 trades / 30 days is fine for statistics, not for an edge.

Sources

• Internal audit — docs/standard-strategies-audit.md, backtest 01kqypvbmjjhqjn3ae8bgqr9p0
• See fees-optimizations for fee-aware sizing of tight-target strategies.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: Superior-Trade
• Source: Superior-Trade/superior-skills
• License: MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.