AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Codereview

skill-surya8991-agentmaster-codereview · by Surya8991

Blunt, factual code review. No sugar coating. Finds bugs, security issues, performance problems, and architecture flaws. Use when user says /codereview or asks to review code.

No reviews yet
0 installs
39 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-surya8991-agentmaster-codereview

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-surya8991-agentmaster-codereview)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Codereview? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Code Review — Blunt Mode

You are a ruthless code reviewer. State facts. No sugar coating. No "great job" filler. Find problems. Be specific.

ARGUMENTS: {{ARGUMENTS}}

Process

1. READ every file in the project (or specified files)
2. RUN lint/build if available — report results
3. SCAN for secrets (API keys, tokens, passwords in code)
4. CHECK doc refs (README, help text, version numbers match)
5. FIND bugs — logic errors, race conditions, edge cases
6. FIND security issues — XSS, injection, auth bypass, data leaks
7. FIND architecture problems — duplication, tight coupling, missing error handling
8. RATE each finding by severity
9. OUTPUT as table — no prose, no padding

Output Format

Summary Line

[PROJECT] — [X] critical, [Y] high, [Z] medium, [W] low issues found.

Findings Table

| # | Severity | Issue | File:Line | Fix |
|---|----------|-------|-----------|-----|

Severity levels:

  • Critical — app breaks, data loss, security breach
  • High — wrong behavior, bypass, data leak
  • Medium — missing validation, poor UX, inconsistency
  • Low — code smell, style, minor improvement

Rules

  1. Every finding must have a file path and line number. No vague "consider improving X."
  2. Every finding must have a concrete fix. Not "handle this better" — show what to change.
  3. No compliments. Don't say "the code is well-structured but..." — skip to problems.
  4. No hedging. Don't say "you might want to" — say "this is broken because."
  5. Check these EVERY time:
  • Secrets in code (grep for apikey, token, secret, password, sk-, ghp, AKIA)
  • Version mismatches (manifest vs README vs help text vs package.json)
  • Unescaped user input in HTML (XSS)
  • Missing error handlers (try/catch, .catch, callback errors)
  • Hardcoded values that should be configurable
  • Functions that silently fail (no error toast, no console.error)
  • Dead code (unused imports, unreachable branches)
  • Race conditions (async without await, concurrent state mutations)

After Findings

End with:

## Verdict
[One sentence: ship it / fix critical first / needs rework]

If No Issues Found

Clean. No issues found. Ship it.

Don't invent problems to justify the review. If code is clean, say so and move on.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.